Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Environmental groups ask P&G investors to vote against CEO as board chair

Stock Markets Sep 19, 2022 08:21PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. The logo for Procter & Gamble Co. is displayed on a screen on the floor of the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) in New York, U.S., June 27, 2018. REUTERS/Brendan McDermid
 
CVX
-0.45%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
MON
0.00%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
PG
+0.06%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
BAYRY
-0.14%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Jessica DiNapoli

NEW YORK (Reuters) -Environmental groups are asking Procter & Gamble (NYSE:PG) Co investors to vote against re-electing its chief executive as board chair, and also opposing two other directors at the annual meeting next month, according to a filing that claims the company uses too much virgin wood pulp in its paper products.

Environmental nonprofits including the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) have targeted the maker of Bounty paper towels and Charmin toilet paper over the last few years, and are also calling on the consumer products company to clean up how it sources palm oil from tropical rainforests.

NRDC, Friends of the Earth and the Rainforest Action Network now want investors to vote against CEO Jon Moeller as chairman of the board, according to the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filing. They also oppose corporate directors Angela Braly, chair of the governance and public responsibility committee and Patricia Woertz, a member of that committee.

Investors are set to vote on the re-election of P&G's corporate directors at its annual meeting on Oct. 11. In the filing, the environmental groups request replacing Moeller with an independent chair, a structure some investors prefer.

"P&G's actions have been insufficient to mitigate deforestation," the filing said, adding that the company's "leadership team lacks the skills, perspectives and experiences" to deal with the environmental risks it faces.

A P&G spokeswoman said that the company's directors all received more than 90% support from investors last year. She added that P&G has issued reports summarizing its efforts, which include disclosing more data and eliminating sourcing from certain forests.

The environmentalists have been prodding P&G to make changes on forestry for several years.

"These proposals are more powerful because they get more support," said Nell Minow, vice chair of corporate governance consultancy ValueEdge Advisors, adding that recent regulatory changes make it easier for activist investors to nominate their own directors.

"There's a significant next step and that is going to turn the heat up on these conversations," Minow said.

The Cincinnati-based company said in an update in July that it has created and is testing two new Charmin products, one made with plant-based fiber and another with bamboo, efforts supported by environmentalists.

The consumer products conglomerate has also vowed that by 2030 it will exclusively purchase wood pulp that meets certain criteria.

A majority of investors two years ago backed a resolution by Green Century Capital Management Inc calling on P&G to issue a report on how it could beef up efforts to eliminate deforestation and degradation in its supply chain.

"Two years later, they've done basically nothing," said Jennifer Skene, a policy manager at NRDC.

Last year, NRDC also urged investors to vote against Braly, and she received significantly fewer votes than other directors did for her re-nomination to the board according to a securities filing.

NRDC has support of two shareholders who are descendants of the founders of P&G, Christopher Matthews of New York and Justine Epstein of the San Francisco Bay Area in California. Matthews and Epstein told Reuters they had asked Moeller for a meeting this month but as of Monday they had yet to hear back.

P&G is "laser-focused on shareholder values and the value of the company from an asset perspective," Matthews said.

"The investment community sees it lagging behind on sustainability," he said.

Braly's role as chair of the governance and public responsibility committee, which oversees environmental concerns including forestry, "have not succeeded in mitigating" risks in P&G's forest sourcing, the environmental groups said.

Woertz's role on the same committee is "questionable," the groups said, because she worked at oil-and-gas explorer Chevron Corp (NYSE:CVX) for nearly 30 years, the non-profits said.

Braly did not immediately return a request for comment. Woertz could not immediately be reached.

The environmental groups said Moeller's work with Monsanto (NYSE:MON), owned by Bayer (OTC:BAYRY), "does not align with prioritizing corporate responsibility or scientific integrity." Bayer agreed in 2020 to pay billions of dollars to settle lawsuits by people who claimed they were harmed by its weed killer Roundup, and is defending itself against thousands of lawsuits by Roundup users.

Moeller left the board of Monsanto in 2018, the P&G spokeswoman said.

Environmental groups ask P&G investors to vote against CEO as board chair
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email