Sign up to create alerts for Instruments,
Economic Events and content by followed authors
Free Sign Up Already have an account? Sign In
Quotes
All Instrument Types
- All Instrument Types
- Indices
- Equities
- ETFs
- Funds
- Commodities
- Currencies
- Crypto
- Bonds
- Certificates
Please try another search
Extended Sale! Save on premium data with Claim 60% OFF
'Clean' investment funds less vulnerable to climate shocks, says EU watchdog
Published Mar 17, 2021 06:05AM ET
Updated Mar 17, 2021 06:26AM ET
© Reuters.
By Huw Jones
LONDON (Reuters) - Funds that invest in 'brown' or polluting companies would be hit far harder than environmentally-friendly 'green' funds in a climate-related market shock, the European Union's securities watchdog said on Wednesday in its first study of its kind.
The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) published what it described as a first attempt to assess vulnerabilities to climate-related financial risks using data from 23,965 EU-based funds worth 10.7 trillion euros ($12.7 trillion).
"Within the European financial sector, investment funds are more exposed to climate-sensitive economic sectors than banks, insurers and pension funds. However, few investment fund climate-related financial risk assessments have been conducted," ESMA said in its latest summary of market risks.
Brown funds spread investments over a large number of the same companies, while green funds 'herd' less, with each one investing in a different selection of companies, ESMA said.
"This suggests greater concentration risks existing across funds whose portfolios contain more polluting assets," ESMA said.
A preliminary climate risk scenario exercise confirmed this, showing that most brown funds' losses ranged from 8% to 19% of affected assets, while losses in green funds ranged from 3% to 7%, ESMA said.
Brown funds also contributed more to total system-wide losses because they are more interconnected.
"Consequently, this asset valuation exercise can be seen either as a warning sign or as an indicator of opportunities for investment funds to anticipate future trends," ESMA said.
"This also relates to discussions around Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) ratings for investment funds, and the need for greater fund transparency on exposure to climate-sensitive sectors."
($1 = 0.8396 euros)
Related Articles
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
Report this comment
I feel that this comment is:
Comment flagged
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.