Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Brewer AB InBev says New Delhi ban to adversely hurt its business in the city

Published 09/05/2019, 06:40 AM
Updated 09/05/2019, 06:46 AM
Brewer AB InBev says New Delhi ban to adversely hurt its business in the city

By Aditya Kalra

NEW DELHI (Reuters) - Anheuser-Busch InBev (BR:ABI) will face a "substantial adverse impact" on its business in New Delhi and is already incurring losses due a ban on its beer sales in the city amid allegations of tax evasion, it said in a court filing seen by Reuters.

The ban could be a major setback for AB InBev, which is also battling a separate antitrust probe in India linked to alleged beer price fixing by SABMiller (LON:SAB), which it acquired in 2016 for around $100 billion, and other firms, industry executives say.

Local authorities in July barred AB InBev, the world's largest brewer, from selling all its beer brands in New Delhi for three years on allegations of evading local taxes. AB InBev has denied the allegations.

An Indian court on Tuesday rejected a request from the brewer to put the ban on hold, saying it must first complete the appeals process before the state authorities.

Describing the ban as "irrational and perverse", the company said it would "face substantial adverse impact on its business operations and livelihood in Delhi and is in fact incurring losses due to black listing".

It did not disclose any specific loss figure.

"Apart from loss of goodwill and reputation, the domestic beer business of the petitioner has come to a complete standstill in New Delhi," AB InBev added in the court filing dated Sept. 2, which has previously not been reported.

A counsel for the Delhi government in the case, Ramesh Singh, did not comment on the contents of AB InBev's court filing, but said "going by records, it seems like a classic case of excise duty evasion".

The Delhi government's ban order came after a three-year investigation which found that beer maker SABMiller used duplicate barcodes on its bottles supplied to city retailers in 2016, allowing it to pay lower levies.

Citing its excise payments of $26 million to the city authorities during 2016-2019, AB InBev argued the ban will hit the state exchequer and lead to "potential increase in illicit alcohol/moonshine trade" as its beer brands were popular.

AB InBev's beer portfolio includes famous brands such as Budweiser, Hoegaarden, Corona and Stella Artois.

It is the second-biggest player in India's $7 billion beer market, accounting for a 17.5% market share, according to research firm IWSR Drinks Market Analysis.

AB InBev has previously said it was hopeful of receiving a fair hearing from the Delhi authorities as it believed appropriate excise duty payments were made and the allegations dated back to 2016, before its takeover of SABMiller.

Calling the Delhi government's order an "excessive exercise of jurisdiction", AB InBev in its court filing said it was not receiving a fair and effective opportunity in its appeals.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.