Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

BlackRock's climate views put it center stage in Exxon boardroom fight

Stock MarketsMay 19, 2021 08:56PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Larry Fink, Chief Executive Officer of BlackRock, stands at the Bloomberg Global Business forum in New York, U.S., September 26, 2018. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton/File Photo

By Jennifer Hiller and Ross Kerber

HOUSTON/BOSTON (Reuters) - Top asset manager BlackRock (NYSE:BLK) could determine the outcome of a proxy fight between Exxon Mobil (NYSE:XOM) and a hedge fund seeking to reshape the oil giant's board and future direction.

Exxon's 12 directors are up for election on May 26, in a vote that offers a high profile test of BlackRock's approach to getting companies set a course to limit global warming to below 2 degrees Celsius by 2050. Exxon stresses it is on a path to meet the Paris accord with a market-based approach.

Forced board changes or splitting chairman and CEO roles would be a blow to the company's management. Unlike rivals that predict peak demand within a decade, Exxon's board has built plans that forecast growing appetite for oil and gas.

BlackRock this year has vowed to hold corporate directors' feet to the fire on environmental matters and has done so for instance by voting against a director on another high-profile corporate ballot.

Its votes could help hedge fund Engine No.1 gain seats on the board. The fund says Exxon continues to overspend on fossil fuels and lacks a clear strategy to prepare for a world demanding cleaner fuels. The May 26 vote has become the first major shareholder contest where climate change is the central issue.

BACKING ESG PROPOSALS

BlackRock declined to comment on its stance on Exxon. It is the second-largest Exxon shareholder with an about 6.6% stake, and has met with Exxon executives twice as often as Chevron (NYSE:CVX) and BP (NYSE:BP), according to its disclosures. Smaller investors have publicly supported Engine No.1's directors.

The $9 trillion asset manager's chief executive, Larry Fink, in January in his annual letter to CEOs asked for companies to lay out a strategy to operate in a net-zero economy.

In the first quarter, it backed three-quarters of environment and social-focused shareholder resolutions, compared with less than 10% a year ago.

Some activists say BlackRock's voting to date has not fully met their expectations. But it has issued greater details about its voting practices, offering insight into what corporations should expect.

A recent disclosure showed BlackRock voted against a director at Woodside (OTC:WOPEY) Petroleum Ltd last month to express concerns with Woodside's climate targets. Woodside declined to comment.

BlackRock also voted last year against two Exxon directors, citing a lack of progress in climate reporting. In both cases, directors were re-elected though Exxon ultimately released more greenhouse gas emissions data.

'CONSTRUCTIVE' TALKS

Some Exxon holders said the pressure is on BlackRock to uphold its tougher goals in voting Exxon shares this year. Governance advisers ISS, Glass, Lewis & Co and PIRC have recommended votes for some or all the dissident nominees for Exxon.

"Investors who understand the importance of overhauling Exxon's board of directors know that major investors, like BlackRock and others, can push our efforts over the top," said New York State Comptroller Thomas DiNapoli. New York's pension funds have backed the call by Engine No.1 for change at Exxon.

Church Commissioners for England, which manages the Church of England's investment fund, expects large asset managers "to vote for the entire dissident slate in line with their stated climate and sustainability goals," said Bess Joffe, head of responsible investment.

Exxon's talks with investors overall have been constructive, said spokesman Casey Norton. "We value their views and welcome input," he said.

Exxon's lack of a target for restricting customers emissions makes it likely BlackRock would not support its director slate, said Kathryn Mulvey, a campaign director at climate activists Union of Concerned Scientists. Engine No.1 "explicitly calls out" Exxon for failing to set so-called Scope 3, or customer emissions targets, she said.

However, Exxon has embraced measures to meet BlackRock's and other investors' climate and governance goals, including expanding its board, pledging to increase spending on lower-carbon initiatives, and reducing the intensity of its oilfield greenhouse gas emissions.

BlackRock's climate views put it center stage in Exxon boardroom fight
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
Mahmut Subasi
Mahmut Subasi May 22, 2021 7:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
This is how invisible hands mess up with large companies
Notvery Goodathis
Peteymcletey May 19, 2021 10:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
pass
Alan Rice
Alan Rice May 19, 2021 1:56PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Too little, too late?? Likely.
Ad Cline
Ad Cline May 19, 2021 1:56PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Let's hope that you're wrong.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email