Please try another search
By Jonathan Stempel
(Reuters) - McDonald's Corp (N:MCD) was hit on Thursday with a potentially multi-billion-dollar lawsuit by Black franchise owners who accused the fast-food giant of racial discrimination for steering them to underperforming stores.
The proposed class action led by James and Darrell Byrd, brothers with four McDonald's restaurants in Tennessee, was filed by the law firm representing 52 Black former franchisees who filed a similar lawsuit on Aug. 31.
McDonald's was accused of placing Black franchisees in undesirable inner-city locations with high security and insurance costs and below-average sales, and driving many away by failing to support them as debts rise and profits fall short.
Jim Ferraro, a lawyer for the plaintiffs, estimated that McDonald's has 186 Black franchisees in the United States, down from a peak of 377 in 1998, who own "700-plus" stores.
The lawsuit, filed in federal court in Chicago, where McDonald's is headquartered, seeks damages of $4 million to $5 million per store, potentially totaling more than $3 billion.
In a statement, McDonald's USA said it has an "obvious interest" in the franchisees' success, and invested significantly in the Byrds' franchises after they encountered difficulties. McDonald's said it will defend against the lawsuit.
McDonald's has taken steps this year to address concerns about its workplace culture, including updating its corporate values for the first time since 2008.
It has denied treating Black franchisees differently, while acknowledging it wants its franchisee ranks to become more diverse. McDonald's has also denied racial discrimination claims in a lawsuit filed in January by two Black executives.
"They've been on a massive PR campaign to clean up their image," Ferraro told reporters on a conference call. "This is actually a good thing, at some level, but not a good enough thing."
McDonald's sought last week to dismiss the lawsuit by the former franchisees, which seeks up to $1 billion in damages, saying it disclosed the risks of owning stores and did not set anyone up for failure.
The case is Byrd et al v McDonald's USA LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois, No. 20-06447.
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.