BIS to hear initial verdict on sterling crash in November

© Reuters. A bank employee counts pound notes at Kasikornbank in Bangkok

By Patrick Graham

LONDON (Reuters) - Central bank officials looking into the factors behind the dramatic fall sterling took on Oct. 7 will make an initial report to the Bank for International Settlements in early November, sources with knowledge of the investigation said.

It is two weeks since the pound crashed and rebounded by about 10 percent in a few minutes at the start of Asian trading, an unprecedented shift for a major currency at a point when the $5-trillion-a-day market is at its lowest ebb.

The moves triggered another round of the hefty losses the pound has suffered since June's Brexit vote, and some sales of UK assets by investors worried over the stability of the currency and its impact on inflation.

Bank of England Governor Mark Carney, who also heads the BIS committee, asked the Swiss-based central banks' central bank to investigate.

"BIS is still in the information-gathering phase but they have a pretty good idea of what happened. The (currency trading) platforms have generally been very helpful with providing data," one source familiar with the first stage of the investigation said on Thursday.

"It will probably be another 2 or 3 weeks before they are ready to draw conclusions but I am sure they will report to the Markets Committee when it meets in early November."

Market participants generally agree the sell-off was at least worsened by the algorithmic machine trading that makes up much of the global currency market, while some speculate the initial move may have come from electronic news gathering software or other parameters used in trading programmers.

BI declined to comment on the progress of the investigation and does not publish dates of its committee meetings.

But a second source with knowledge of its workings confirmed the markets committee would meet in Geneva at the start of next month.

The Bank of England also declined to comment.

The BoE's main formal forum for relating to currency markets, the London Foreign Exchange Joint Standing Committee, is not due to meet until later in November and no additional meeting has been called to discuss the crash.

The BoE's regular liaison with currency markets came under scrutiny in the course of a two-year investigation into market rigging that also saw the chief dealers sub-group of the committee closed.

BoE LIQUIDITY BACKSTOP?

The first source said that for now central bank officials responsible for overseeing events on the global currency market, the world's biggest, were not concerned by the prospect of a repeat of the crash.

He also said it had not been ruled out that the Oct. 7 move had been caused by market participants deliberately stepping in when the market was at its thinnest.

"If you were trying to move the market it was certainly the best time of the day to do it," the source said.

"We certainly cannot rule out that there might be more moves like it. But in the end all of these events have pretty much returned pretty much to where they were. Here, if you went out for a well-timed coffee when you came back it was over."

Both he and a third source with close ties to the Bank of England, said that one issue that had been discussed was whether central banks should set up orders far away from market rates to prevent price crashes not justified by fundamentals.

"The Bank of England is not going to invest in its own algos (computer-driven machine trading) to oppose this sort of thing," the third source said.

"The only thing you could think about is a liquidity backstop. You would have some levels in a machine far away from the market price, let's say 5 figures off. In this case, for example, it wouldn't have taken a lot to turn this around."

On the day, sterling fell from around $1.26 to as low as $1.1491, according to Thomson Reuters' Matching data, although several banks and other platforms have chosen to regard the traded low as $1.1838 given the low volumes traded below that level.

"The interesting thing about this one is just that it was completely out of nowhere... ... (and) did not spill over into any other currency, any other asset class," the first source said.

(editing by John Stonestreet)