Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

Bank of England says it won't take 'risky bets' to help City's competitiveness

Stock Markets Sep 27, 2022 09:07AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. A commuter walks past the Bank of England, in London, Britain, September 26, 2022. REUTERS/Peter Nicholls

By Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) - The Bank of England's new objective of helping the financial sector remain globally competitive should not encourage risky bets on regulatory standards to win business, BoE executive director Victoria Saporta said on Tuesday.

Britain wants a "Big Bang 2.0" - a reference to deregulation of the stock market in the 1980s which strengthened the financial sector's global reach - to bolster the City of London following Brexit.

A draft law before parliament setting out many regulatory changes also gives the BoE and Financial Conduct Authority a new secondary objective of aiding the economy and financial sector's global competitiveness and growth.

Saporta said the best way to maintain competitiveness is by having a regulatory regime that is open, predictable, transparent and aligned with international standards.

"One thing I want to make clear is that I don't believe regulators should engage in risky compromises such as regulatory races to the bottom to win business," Saporta told a City & Financial conference.

Britain's finance minister Kwasi Kwarteng is due next month to outline what he has called an ambitious deregulatory agenda by tearing up some of the financial rules inherited from the EU, starting last week with scrapping the cap on banker bonuses, and which will include easing capital rules for insurers.

Kwarteng told a meeting with asset managers and insurers on Tuesday that "Big Bang 2.0" next month was a top priority to get the City back to being the world's foremost financial centre to drive growth.

He said he would "sort out" insurance capital rules, whose easing has faced resistance from the BoE, but reaffirmed existing regulatory structures and their independence.

New Prime Minister Liz Truss had said she would review UK financial regulators, sparking talk of a merger.


Saporta said alignment with international standards makes it easier for international firms to conduct business in the United Kingdom.

"It avoids inefficiencies that would arise from international firms having to comply with a different set of rules when they operate here," she said.

Financial centres are more competitive when their regulators have a good reputation for being independent, Saporta said.

But Nicholas Lyons, chair of savings group Phoenix, and Lord Mayor of the City of London from November, said the City was not looking for a bonfire of regulations, but it has been like a "dog with its tail between its legs" since the global financial crisis.

"We have this phenomenal opportunity now where we have an administration focused on releasing the capacity of the City, we actually have an opposition party fully behind the need to grow and invest, we have a regulator that is resistant to some of the urgency we feel that is necessary...but I think we will get there," Lyons said.

Nick Collier, the City of London's representative in Brussels, said 'rhetoric' about Brexit dividends, deregulation and a Big Bang 2.0 means the City won't get access to the EU financial market in the forseeable future.

"But in Brussels... they are quite nervous about what the UK is doing. If we get it right, we should be a very vibrant and deep capital market," Collier said.

Conor Lawlor, managing director at UK Finance, which represents UK banks, said it was important to make the most of the appetite for reform, as it won't be around forever.

Bank of England says it won't take 'risky bets' to help City's competitiveness

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email