Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Analysis-Women's U.S. boardroom gains slow as diversity focus shifts

Published 09/08/2022, 06:07 AM
Updated 09/08/2022, 10:56 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The female gender symbol is seen displayed on the Ernst and Young Building on International Women's Day in Times Square in New York City, New York, U.S., March 8, 2018. REUTERS/Elizabeth Shafiroff/

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The female gender symbol is seen displayed on the Ernst and Young Building on International Women's Day in Times Square in New York City, New York, U.S., March 8, 2018. REUTERS/Elizabeth Shafiroff/

By Ross Kerber

(Reuters) - A push to get more women on U.S. boards has slowed this year, raising concern among recruiters that some firms may have "ticked the gender box" by hitting minimum levels of female representation or moved on to focus on other diversity issues.

    Improving boardroom diversity has become a focus for many investors who say having a broader range of experiences around the top table improves decision-making and corporate cultures.

But new data and interviews show that's not the only priority at many companies. Figures that researcher Equilar shared with Reuters showed women made up a smaller share of new directors who joined company boards in the first two quarters of this year, accounting for around 40% of new directors in both timeframes.

The figures undo a rising trend seen in 2021 when women accounted for 41% of new directors in the first quarter and 47% of new directors in the second quarter.

The figure then rose to 48% for the last two quarters of 2021, the highest share since Equilar began tracking companies on the Russell 3000 index in 2017. (Graphic: https://tmsnrt.rs/3edQSYk)

Graphic: Women’s share of new directorships declines- https://graphics.reuters.com/USA-CORPORATIONS/byprjgrjepe/chart.png

To be sure quarterly numbers can fluctuate, with women accounting for just 36% of new directors as recently as mid-2020. The total share of women directors among the Russell 3000 has risen steadily.

Equilar, and a number of recruiters, told Reuters the slowing pace in part reflects boards turning their attention away from gender equality to racial equality, instead of focusing on both.

Boards are "focusing on diversity beyond gender," said Equilar Director of Research Courtney Yu, especially if they already include at least one woman as required by Nasdaq Inc.

Equilar said 67 Russell 3000 companies had no women on their boards as of June 30 and 443 companies had just one woman, down from 633 such companies a year earlier.

'LITTLE REVOLT'

Beth Stewart, CEO of search firm Trewstar Corporate Board Services, said some boards also may have reached level where a third of members were women - the goal of activists like the 30% Club https://30percentclub.org/ – and then shifted their attention as they recruit other new directors.

In addition some white male directors think they have enough diverse candidates, she said. "There's been a little revolt going on among white men," Stewart said.

Pressure to add women eased in May when a California judge struck down a state law mandating boardroom gender diversity.

It's unclear how the dynamics have affected minority boardroom representation, for which current Equilar data was not available.

Among bigger companies in the S&P 500, which tend to have more diversity, women accounted for 46% of new directors according to security filings through April 30, up from 43% a year earlier, said recruiting firm Spencer Stuart.

Ethnic or racial minorities accounted for 46% of new directors in the latest period, down from 47% a year earlier, the report said. As in previous years, more new minority directors were men than women.

Limiting change is that many boards add just one director a year, said Keith Meyer, a practice leader with recruiting firm Allegis Partners. Few U.S. boards have the term limits common in Europe, and many have done away with age limits.

"A reason U.S. boards are very stagnant is there's no easy exit path," he said.

NEW VOICES

Meyer said an easy fix would be for boards to expand their rosters. That is what happened at the start of the year at Houston-based food service distributor Sysco Corp (NYSE:SYY), which created three new board seats and named two women among new directors.

A Sysco representative said the company "continues to prioritize efforts to advance diversity, equity and inclusion across all areas of the company and on the board of directors."

Some companies have cited obstacles to diversity including costs or challenges of finding suitable candidates amid much competition for women and minorities. One, casino operator Red Rock Resorts (NASDAQ:RRR) Inc in an April securities filing said all five of its directors are white men.

While the company values diversity, Red Rock said it also must consider the cost of adding directors. Further the limited pool of potential directors willing to subject themselves to the rigors of obtaining a gaming license "and the demand for qualified diverse candidates will continue to impact our ability to attract certain categories of diverse directors," the filing states.

A Red Rock spokesperson declined to comment further.

Wall Street bank Wells Fargo (NYSE:WFC) & Co expanded its board and named three new directors this year including two women, one of whom is African-American.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The female gender symbol is seen displayed on the Ernst and Young Building on International Women's Day in Times Square in New York City, New York, U.S., March 8, 2018. REUTERS/Elizabeth Shafiroff/

Celeste Clark, a member of Wells Fargo's nominating committee, said in looking for diverse candidates it aimed to "widen the aperture" to consider executives from nontraditional executive roles, not just people who have been CEOs or CFOs of other companies.

"Recruitment of racially and gender-diverse candidates doesn’t just happen," Clark said.

Latest comments

Forcing Diversity is the American way .. Obey
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.