Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

BofA tells court Ambac cannot prove $2.7 billion mortgage case

Published 09/07/2022, 06:24 AM
Updated 09/07/2022, 03:01 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Bank of America building is seen in Los Angeles, California, U.S., May 6, 2019. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo

By Jody Godoy

(Reuters) -Bond insurer Ambac Financial (NYSE:AMBC) Group Inc cannot prove its $2.7 billion case against Bank of America (NYSE:BAC) over troubled mortgage-backed securities on evidence that BofA was a "bad actor" before the 2008 financial crisis, an attorney for the bank said on Wednesday in New York state court.

Ambac seeks to recoup more than $2 billion in insurance claims it paid to cover investor losses on securities backed by 375,000 home loans from Bank of America's Countrywide unit. As the trial in the 12-year-old case opened on Wednesday, an attorney for the bond insurer argued that Countrywide's own files show it systematically approved shoddy mortgages and pushed the risk onto investors and insurers.

But that type of evidence is not sufficient to show the bank violated insurance agreements it made with Ambac, said the bank's attorney Enu Mainigi in her opening statement. Courts have ruled in other cases that insurers must prove such agreements were breached on a loan-by-loan basis, she said.

Mainigi also said it was Ambac that accepted more risk in order to cash in on pre-2008 optimism in the housing market, until the financial crisis undermined borrowers' ability to repay their loans.

"Now Ambac is here asking this court to conclude that somehow all of this is Countrywide's fault," she said.

Between 2004 and 2006, Ambac insured securities backed by Countrywide loans worth $25 billion. The insurer claims 80% of the loans were the product of poor underwriting standards or had other deficiencies that violated insurance agreements, and that Bank of America failed to repurchase the loans as required.

Ambac attorney Michael Carlinsky said in his opening statement that the bond insurer was "decimated" by its exposure to Countrywide's troubled mortgage-backed securities.

The insurer ultimately paid more than $2 billion in claims to cover investor losses after the mortgages failed, and is seeking $2.7 billion including interest.

New York Supreme Court Justice Robert Reed is overseeing the trial, which is expected to last multiple weeks.

At its peak, Ambac was the second-largest bond insurer in the world, having guaranteed the timely payment of interest and principal on more than $550 billion of debt.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A Bank of America building is seen in Los Angeles, California, U.S., May 6, 2019. REUTERS/Lucy Nicholson/File Photo

The case is the largest of several lawsuits Ambac has pursued against issuers of residential mortgage-backed securities. The company filed for bankruptcy in 2010, after the housing market crashed, and emerged in 2013.

Bank of America spent years cleaning up the mess from the 2008 crisis. It repaid a $45 billion bailout by taxpayers and was slapped with more than $76 billion in fines in the decade after the housing crash.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.