Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Wisconsin high court voids governor's mask mandate, settling partisan dispute

Published 03/31/2021, 04:38 PM
Updated 04/01/2021, 01:10 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Day 3 of the Democratic National Convention 2020 held in Milwaukee

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Day 3 of the Democratic National Convention 2020 held in Milwaukee

(Reuters) - A divided Wisconsin Supreme Court on Wednesday struck down Governor Tony Evers' mask mandate, saying he exceeded his authority and violated the separation of powers by reissuing emergency orders during the pandemic.

In its 4-to-3 ruling, which voids a Feb. 4 face-covering order currently in effect, the court found that Evers effectively breached a statute that limits his emergency powers to 60 days without approval of the state legislature.

"The question in this case is not whether the governor acted wisely; it is whether he acted lawfully," Justice Brian Hagedorn wrote for the majority. "We conclude he did not."

Evers, a Democrat, declared a state of emergency last March, which the Republican-controlled legislature never extended beyond its statutory 60-day limit.

In a partisan battle similar to others across the country over face-covering requirements aimed at slowing the spread of the coronavirus, Evers reissued his orders roughly every 60 days, changing some of the requirements each time.

His most recent renewal of an emergency health order on Feb. 4 came shortly after the legislature voted to repeal his earlier order requiring face coverings in public places.

The court's majority likened the governor's recurring orders to a game of whack-a-mole in which he sought to dodge the legislature, which opposed his extended emergency powers, by altering each new order even though it was substantially similar.

"The governor cannot make an end run around legislative revocation simply by itemizing a previously unidentified justification for the state of emergency," it said.

Responding to the ruling, Evers said he followed the guidance of health experts to keep residents safe.

"While we work to get folks vaccinated as quickly as we can, we know wearing a mask saves lives, and we still need Wisconsinites to mask up so we can beat this virus and bounce back from this pandemic,” he said in a statement.

Two of the justices, including Chief Justice Patience Roggensack, issued a separate concurring opinion.

In their dissent, three justices faulted the majority for granting standing to the plaintiff, Jere Fabick, a Midwest dealer in Caterpillar Inc (NYSE:CAT) products who sits on the board of a conservative think tank, arguing that he was unharmed by the orders as a taxpayer.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Day 3 of the Democratic National Convention 2020 held in Milwaukee

"Unfortunately, the ultimate consequence of the majority's decision is that it places yet another roadblock to an effective governmental response to COVID-19, further jeopardizing the health and lives of the people of Wisconsin," Justice Ann Walsh Bradley wrote in her dissent.

Latest comments

Fascist dictator Democrats govs are gradually losing their grip. Newsom will be recalled, Cuomo has all but been overthrown as Ralp Northam is daily humiliated as Virginia ignores him.
Most of the responsible businesses in Wisconsin are requiring masks any ways and have no plans to to change until the virus is under control and infections, hospitalizations and death diminish and stay down.
No need for a mask if you are a healthy person or have been vaccinated. 🤦‍♂️
Not true. The mask is not to protect you, it's to protect others around you (from you). Even if you've had the vaccination you can still carry and spread the virus to others unknowingly. Also, simply being healthy doesn't prevent you from getting infected. It might mean you get only mild symptoms, but again, you can still infect others around you who have weaker immune systems. So masks are still very helpful until the majority of people have been vaccinated.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.