Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Why are Republicans hell-bent on exposing Trump whistleblower?

Published 11/08/2019, 10:35 AM
Updated 11/08/2019, 10:35 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump departs for travel to Louisiana at the White House in Washington

By David Morgan and Mark Hosenball

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - An aggressive push by President Donald Trump's Republican allies to unmask an anonymous whistleblower who ignited the impeachment inquiry could help shore up voter support for Trump, as Congress enters a critical new phase of televised hearings, party officials and strategists say.

The whistleblower, a U.S. intelligence official who complained about Trump's July 25 telephone call with Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, has in recent days increasingly become a target of noisy attacks by Trump, his allies in Congress and the conservative media, all of whom have pushed for the whistleblower to be named.

Trump has suggested the whistleblower committed treason.

Lawyers for the whistleblower have refused to disclose their client's identity and have expressed fears for the person's safety. They say Trump is violating federal laws.

"Let me be clear: should any harm befall any suspected named whistleblower or their family, the blame will rest squarely with your client," whistleblower lawyer Andrew Bakaj said in a Nov. 7 cease-and-desist letter to White House Counsel Pat Cipollone.

The whistleblower was initially considered a star witness of the impeachment inquiry. But the Democratic-led investigation, now in its sixth week, has heard from a parade of current and former U.S. officials who have largely corroborated the whistleblower's account of the call in which Trump pressed Zelenskiy to open an investigation into former U.S. Vice President Joe Biden and his businessman son Hunter Biden.

Democratic lawmakers say they no longer need to hear from the whistleblower to make their case that Trump abused his office for personal political gain. The president has denied any wrongdoing and accused his opponents of a witch hunt.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

As Democratic interest in the whistleblower has waned, the Republican push to unmask the person has ratcheted up, raising questions about what Republicans hope to gain.

Trump's allies want to try to counter potentially damaging testimony by U.S. diplomats during next week's public hearings by presenting the whistleblower as a partisan figure who helped Democrats launch an impeachment inquiry that had long been considered, according to House of Representatives Republican aides and strategists.

"The Republican issue with the whistleblower is that there seems to be an inherently political motive behind what he said and did and presented," said a Republican Party official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

"It fits in the larger narrative that this has been a partisan effort from the beginning," the official said.

A spokesman for House Republican Leader Kevin McCarthy did not immediately respond to a Reuters query about the Republican focus on the whistleblower.

Conservative news articles purporting to identify the whistleblower have sought to link the person with Joe Biden and "deep state" conspirators within the Obama administration who some Republicans say were determined to undermine Trump's candidacy when he was running for office and later his presidency.

"They're trying to define the impeachment hearings as political before they begin. It helps fire up the base and tries to tint the testimony before it actually takes place," said Republican strategist Ron Bonjean.

Republican Senator Rand Paul told reporters this week that he would view the whistleblower as "a material witness" who could support Trump's allegations of corruption against Biden, should the House impeachment drive lead to a Senate trial. "They absolutely need to testify," Paul said. "He could well have firsthand knowledge."

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

DEFLECTION

Aides and strategists say the aim of the push to unmask the whistleblower is to deflect voter attention away from impeachment testimony and cast doubt on the Democratic-led proceedings.

"Republican voters want to stick with their tribe and defend the president, and they need something to go on. This gives strong Trump voters something to say when the actual request to Ukraine is indefensible," said Republican strategist Rory Cooper, who was a top aide to former House Majority Leader Eric Cantor.

The Republican Party official said internal polling shows that large numbers of voters view the impeachment investigation as politically motivated.

Representative Jim Jordan, a staunch Trump ally and leading Republican opponent of the inquiry, said on Thursday that Republicans intend to subpoena the whistleblower to testify in public. House Democrats have accused Republican lawmakers of using closed-door testimony to try to learn the whistleblower's identity from witnesses.

The president's son, Donald Trump Jr., posted on Twitter this week a link to an article containing the purported name of the whistleblower, while Senator Paul urged U.S. media to report on the whistleblower's identity and said he could announce it himself.

Trump's daughter Ivanka, however, said the whistleblower is not particularly relevant.

"The whistleblower shouldn't be a substantive part of the conversation," she told the Associated Press on Friday, adding that the person "did not have firsthand information."

Latest comments

Read the regs people, there is no such thing as whistleblower anonymity, if you claim whistleblower status you cannot be anonymous
That doesn't mean you have to go out of your way to expose them. Especially when it's public knowledge that some crazy Trumpsters have already threatened violence and death to the whistle-blower.
the whistleblower is a registered Democrat who worked in the white house for Biden and is also connected to Trump hater John Brennan.
Michael, what proof do you have of your claims? And even if you're correct, so what? The whistle-blower's claim has already been corroborated by several other first-hand witnesses now.
Lets get the tape of the actual call
The whistleblower was not on the phone call... heard it second hand... so its more like whistle echoer... glad to see the media is bent on trying to form opinion and run the country
it doesnt matter even if it was all secondhand whistleblower complaints can be if the info is credible which so far it was, it's an anonymous tip like any other. plus people can easily get the whistleblower complaint anyone who blindly follow single news sources (especially biased news) and dont fact check should reevaluate
And another reason it doesn't matter is that the whistle-blower's report is not what is used to impeach the president. It could end up being part of the evidence, but a whistle-blower claim, by itself, is not  the sole evidence used in any case. It is simply the initial alert that something seems not right, which then launches an investigation (which is exactly what is going on now).  It's just like if you call the cops on you your neighbor, or regarding something that you saw or heard, that alone is not used to convict, or even lay charges on the person. It simply puts the police (investigators) into action to see if there was in fact a crime, and then gather enough evidence to lay charges and bring it to trial. So the fact so many Republicans are so upset about this whistle-blower, and demanding for him to be exposed just shows the amount of ignorance regarding the process.
The call “transcript” has yet to be released. A true transcript would be a word-for-word reporting of EXACTLY what was stated on the call. What has been released is what the White House admitted was only a “rough” summary of Trump’s actual call with Zelinsky. Yes, so as Mr. Gatling suggests below, go ahead and read what the White House released and pay particular attention to all the elipses, which indicate the incriminating parts of the conversation that were conveniently left out by Trump’s legal thugs.
the fact so many people say "read the transcript" when the document itself says this shouldnt be taken as a full transcript baffles me.
peltola must be an illegal. Trump did NOTHING wrong by exposing crock Biden. Liberal Reuters, whistleblower is evil Schiff's words.
Rita, put down the Kool-aid. Trump didn't expose anything except his own corruption and desperation. The accusations against Biden came out long before Trump. And they have also been debunked long ago. And you can stop focusing on the Whistle-blower since there have now been several new witnesses who have first-hand knowledge and have corroborated the whistle-blower's claims.
Why are Democrats so ***bent on keeping the blower secret?
anonymous must mean SOMETHING. dictionaries In the white house somewhere
Tom, that's a silly question. The whole point of the Whistle-blower legislation (that Republicans supported) was so that people can report wrong-doing without fear of reprisal. Otherwise you end up with a dangerous situation where everybody is too scared to report anything. The current whistle-blower has already received numerous threats to his life, through his lawyers, from crazy Trumpsters. Those death threats make it even more important for his identity to be kept secret.
Read the call transcript. It is only a few pages.
it's not a full transcript it says it on the document that it is not and shouldn't be taken as a verbatim transcript. parts may be left out by missing parts of the call.
Trump did wrong. No matter what or who told, he did it. He him self doesn't denie that. Are everyone insane...
i mean one big one proved by the rough transcript. he sent his personal lawyer to perform official government duties that were not okayed by the state department or department of justice.
why are Democrats so ********bent on getting this guy at a office from day one they're a bunch of sick pups and I don't respect any Democrat likes this bunch
out of office
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.