Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. Supreme Court spurns case over California LGBT rights-related policy

Published 04/26/2021, 10:06 AM
Updated 04/26/2021, 11:41 AM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: LGBTQ activists and supporters rally outside the U.S. Supreme Court in Washington

By Lawrence Hurley

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday turned away a challenge by Republican-governed Texas to a law enacted by Democratic-led California that bars state-funded travel to states deemed to be hostile to the rights of LGBT people.

The 2016 measure was enacted in the most populous U.S. state in response to laws in conservative states that allowed certain businesses to refuse service to LGBT customers. Those laws cited the need to protect religious liberty.

Two conservative justices, Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas, said they would have heard the case.

Texas sued after California in 2017 added it to its list, now numbering 12, of states covered by the ban.

Texas was placed on the list after its Republican-controlled legislature passed a measure that allowed child welfare providers to deny service based on their religious beliefs - a move California said would allow groups to discriminate on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

Texas said in its lawsuit, which was filed directly at the Supreme Court as is allowed in some disputes between states, that California's law violated the U.S. Constitution's so-called commerce clause by discriminating against interstate commerce. West Virginia, Kansas and Tennessee were among 19 states that filed a brief backing Texas.

Former President Donald Trump's administration had urged the court to take up the case, saying the California law "transgresses constitutional principles that are designed to bind the states together in a single union."

In a case also filed directly at the Supreme Court in December, Texas asked the justices to toss out President-elect Joe Biden's election victories over Trump in four key states. The court also rejected that request.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Latest comments

CA really means "states where perverts don't get special rights".
Did you know a transgender woman doesn't have a prostate
4 headlines regarding the Supreme Court by Reuters today, all on the frontpage of this investing website. The DNC give marching orders to push Supreme Court propaganda on the sheep because they want to pack the court?
you too noticed how the msm depicts Biden vs Trump so differently. but sadly most of the country continue to fall for dnc propaganda
"Texas asked the justices to toss out President-elect Joe Biden's election victories over Trump in four key states. The court also rejected that request."  -- I am so tired from all the winning.......Trump 2020!
Evidently you didn't read the 18 states AG requests
Patience LGBTQIA+ friends Texas will be blue soon.Bigotry will end and you will unite with your Cali partners.Being an hetero will be a big turn off in coming days.
You will never wash away the shame of the unnatural relations, regardless of the enforcement of acceptance, let that sink in
You forgot the M, which is short for MAP.
Insane people, they should go to psychiatrist.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.