Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Republicans to push ahead with U.S. Supreme Court pick despite Democrats' boycott

Published 10/21/2020, 05:19 PM
Updated 10/21/2020, 09:15 PM
© Reuters. Barrett meets with U.S. senators ahead of vote on her nomination

By Richard Cowan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Senate Republicans pledged to go ahead with a vote on Thursday on President Donald Trump's Supreme Court nominee, Amy Coney Barrett, despite Judiciary Committee Democrats pledging to boycott a proceeding that they called "a sham."

Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Lindsey Graham (NYSE:GHM) said in a statement on Wednesday that "Judge Barrett deserves a vote and she will receive a vote."

Just hours earlier, Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer and Judiciary Committee Democrats said they would not show up for the vote. They have been urging Republicans to await the results of the Nov. 3 presidential election before advancing a nominee to fill the Supreme Court vacancy created by the September death of liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

"Amidst a global pandemic and ongoing election, Republicans are rushing to confirm a Supreme Court Justice to take away health care from millions and execute the extreme and deeply unpopular agenda that they've been unable to get through Congress," the Democrats said.

“This has been a sham process from the beginning," they said, noting that U.S. elections were only 12 days away and that early ballots already were being cast.

Graham, who is in a tough re-election campaign in South Carolina, countered, saying in his statement that Barrett "has a judicial disposition that should be the gold standard for all future nominees" to the high court.

All 12 Republicans on the Judiciary Committee have indicated they will support Barrett, a favorite of Christian conservatives, while all 10 Democrats are opposed. Graham is thus thought to have enough votes to prevail.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Assuming the Judiciary Committee sends the nomination to the full Senate with a favorable recommendation as expected, Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell aims to hold a procedural vote on Barrett's nomination on Sunday, which would limit debate so that a final vote to confirm her could occur on Monday.

LOOMING ELECTION

Democrats have fiercely opposed Barrett, a federal appeals court judge whose confirmation by the Republican-led Senate would expand the top U.S. judicial body's conservative majority to 6-3.

McConnell, who has made confirmation of Trump's conservative judicial appointees a high priority, has been working to get Barrett confirmed to the lifetime post before Election Day, as the Republican president has requested. Republicans hold a 53-47 Senate majority.

Trump has said he believes the Supreme Court will decide the election's outcome as he faces Democratic challenger Joe Biden, and has made clear he wants Barrett on the bench for any election-related cases.

No nominee to the Supreme Court has ever been confirmed by the Senate this close to a presidential election.

Democrats reiterated their anger that Senate Republicans moved forward with the nomination so near the election after refusing in 2016 to allow the chamber to act on a Supreme Court nomination by Trump's Democratic predecessor, Barack Obama, because it was an election year.

"Now, Republicans have moved at breakneck speed to jam through this nominee, ignoring her troubling record and unprecedented evasions, and breaking longstanding committee rules to set tomorrow's vote," the Democrats said in their statement.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"Fearing a loss at the ballot box, Republicans are showing that they do not care about the rules or what the American people want, but are concerned only with raw political power," the statement added.

Barrett frustrated Judiciary Committee Democrats during her confirmation hearing last week by sidestepping questions on abortion, presidential powers, climate change, voting rights, Obamacare and other issues.

Latest comments

Ole President elected for 4 year term. And .........that is that.
Despite the fact that 75% of all Americans think she is an EXCELLENT pick for the court. Those dems will never learn.
Which of your 3 friends didn’t think she was an excellent pick?
T.D.S.
She failed big time....no vote here...
That's ok there Dave you dont get a vote.
Judge Ginsburg chose not to step aside in 2016 so her friend Hillary could choose her successor.
Pick up you marbles and go home. Clean house and come back in 4 years with a Democrat the can speak to the people!
Court expansion is a matter of survival, not politics. More important is ending the filibuster. It isn't in the Constitution. Democrats in the majority could have 53 votes for a bill, but will need to beg the Republican minority get 60 votes to "close debate" just to get a bill to a vote. Democrats should have killed the filibuster in 2009, when they had the chance. History would have been different. My understanding is that this time they will. Watch for the look on McConnell's face when it happens and he can't do a darned thing it.
So the Republicans would not have had the filibuster in their way the last 4 years? That would have been nice, especially the first 2 years when they controlled both houses. we would have had NAFTA gone 3 years ago instead of just this past July.
Packed supreme court come February with a max number of members capped at 17.
Democrats would do the exact same thing given the chance to gain a majority. It's politics, pulling the morality card is ridiculous. It is fully within the rights of the president to nominate and for the senate to confirm. That's why you win a majority in the senate or the house, to increase influence. She has been proven to be highly qualified, of upstanding character, and has the approval of the bipartisan comittee that oversaw her review.
There is no bipartisan committee overseeing her review. It has been all ramed through by the repos exact opposite what the did for Obamas nominee. They will rue the day.
Very good call Coll..it amazes me that this is an investing site sometimes via the emotional posts by some of  the readers. This is framed as a site where people who understand numbers and hard data use it to their advantage for them and their families. Your post was accurate and still received 2 down votes so far. Makes the case more clear of how people lose money( and elections for that matter) by relying on too much emotion. The dems did it too themselves once again and RBG was warned to step down years ago.
Karma is a blank. Republicans will rue the day this disgraceful act happened
Democrats would not have waited.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.