Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Trump's Supreme Court nominee advocated overturning legalized abortion

Published 10/01/2020, 05:24 PM
Updated 10/01/2020, 09:18 PM
© Reuters. U.S. Supreme Court nominee Barrett meets with U.S. Senator Cramer on Capitol Hill in Washington

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's U.S. Supreme Court nominee Amy Coney Barrett in 2006 signed on to an advertisement in an Indiana newspaper calling for the landmark 1973 ruling that legalized abortion nationwide to be overturned, a stance certain to be scrutinized during her upcoming Senate confirmation hearings.

Her participation in the ad published in the South Bend Tribune, first reported on Thursday by the Guardian, made clear her view on the contentious issue even as Trump seeks to appeal to religious conservatives who make up an important voting bloc for him in the Nov. 3 U.S. presidential election.

Barrett and her husband, a former federal prosecutor, both were among those who lent their names to the ad, which called the Roe v. Wade decision "an exercise of raw judicial power."

"It's time to put an end to the barbaric legacy of Roe v. Wade and restore law that protects the lives of unborn children," the advertisement, purchased by an anti-abortion organization called St. Joseph County Right to Life, stated.

Barrett, who on Thursday continued with a series of meetings with individual senators ahead of Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearings due to start on Oct. 12, declined to answer questions about the ad. Democratic committee members can be expected to press her on the issue.

Trump, who in January addressed an anti-abortion rally in Washington and said "unborn children have never had a stronger defender in the White House," promised during the 2016 presidential race to appoint Supreme Court justices who would overturn Roe v. Wade.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Trump has called on the Senate to confirm Barrett to replace the late liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, a defender of abortion rights, by Election Day. During Tuesday's debate, Trump objected when his Democratic challenger Joe Biden said the fate of Roe V. Wade was "on the ballot" in the election. Trump told Biden, "You don't know her view on Roe v. Wade."

A devout Catholic who earned a law degree and taught at the University of Notre Dame, a Catholic institution in South Bend, Barrett is a favorite of religious conservatives. She was a law professor at Notre Dame at the time of the ad.

Overturning the ruling has been a longstanding goal of U.S. religious conservatives. The ruling recognized that a constitutional right to personal privacy protects a woman's ability to obtain an abortion. The court in 1992 reaffirmed the ruling and prohibited laws that place an "undue burden" on obtaining an abortion. Conservative opponents of the ruling have argued that the case was wrongly decided.

Latest comments

Does anyone recall how the Roe V. Wade decision was reached? The justices at the time commented that until it was scientifically established of when life began (the exact time new life began) a woman would have the right to end her pregnancy by means of ****** Well, in the last few years scientists have come to agree that it is actually at the moment of conception. Soooo... logically speaking it sounds like this issue is up for a review of the science that the Roe v. Wade decision was presicated.
Not sure why reuters remived the word a b o r t i o n from my post?
Well, the CJOTSC has already shown that he will move to keep previous Supreme Court rulings from being overturned.It will most likely take a constitutional amendment to require women to carry pregnancies to term.
Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood, was one of the biggest racist ever. This is one of the liberals great heros. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2020/07/23/racism-eugenics-margaret-sanger-deserves-no-honors-column/5480192002/
Better stock up...there will be a run on coat hangars soon.
Excellent. Great news
Good, ******babies is morally indefensible.
ACB was already grilled for he current Apellate Court appointment. Check it out at C-SPAN videos.🎯
So what. Kamala Harris 6 days ago supported BLM and letting more viscious criminals out of jail. Harris is p0iS0n.
Old and New very different.
Old and New very different.
This article is false and wrong... ACB stance is that each state should decide if it will permit infanticide... which parallels the constitution
This isnt actually true... she just doesnt think fed gov should decide this and it should be decided by the states because she is a constitutionalist
How many uears till america looks back shamefully on ******the way we look at the antebellum south?
Bravo Mr President
Great. Lets do it. 80 million aborted since Roe. Kind of a lot.
Good its ******** They're murdering millions a year
Harvesting baby parts by Planned Parenthood requires the baby be alive. Think about that.
There may as well be no hearings the GOP will confirm her no matter what comes up.
Thank God!
The real problem here is that Roe v. Wade should have never been a federal. It's a states issue that was federalized by liberals who have been politicizing our judicial system for decades. It is time to set a firm time limit on abortions. I think that will very likely happen because 3rd trimester abortions are barbaric and reek of infanticide.
 oh and ps: you are putting restrictions on other peoples lives instead of living your own. But please do save some more babies in those poor bible belt states. Sounds like a great plan. The world is already overpopulated, but why even try to have any semblance of right to birth because some loony religious folks think thats wrong and the devil. who BY THE WAY ARE IN THE MINORITY in comparison to the rest of the population. give me a break, just live your life and let other people live theirs.
 - So by your logic, maybe we should have forced euthanasia at.. say 70 years old. Does that sound about right to you? The vast majority of Americans favor restricting 3rd trimester abortions because they are seriously barbaric. I think meeting in the middle would be the ethical thing to do here.
 Yes, they are restricted that's why the are only given in extreme circumstances like saving the life of the mother! What planet are you living on? No state allows it that late except under those circumstances.
2million abortions a year. Many use as form of birth control. May the new justice bring justice for these lives and future babies. MAGA!
Another uneducated Trump supporter putting out numbersc with no proof. The AMA says about 900,000 in 2019 down from 978,000 in 2018. Also the constitution guarantees freedom of choice for all. Only some religions condemn *******so GOD should be the judge not the supreme court.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.