Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Trump impeachment prosecutor, Adam Schiff, is becoming Exhibit A in president's defense

Published 01/24/2020, 05:25 PM
Updated 01/24/2020, 05:25 PM
© Reuters. House managers Schiff and Nadler face reporters on fourth day of Trump impeachment trial on Capitol Hill in Washington

By Brad Heath

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The lawmaker walking U.S. senators methodically through the case for removing President Donald Trump from office is also becoming Exhibit A in efforts by the president's allies to defend him.

Over the first three days of Trump's impeachment trial, the head of the House of Representatives Intelligence Committee,  Adam Schiff, has led a team of Democratic lawmakers serving as prosecutors as they lay out their evidence that Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading 2020 Democratic presidential contender.

Even a few of Trump’s fellow Republicans have said Schiff has made an effective case.

At the same time, Trump’s lawyers and political allies have made Schiff a central focus of their efforts to defend the president during his trial. When they laid out their written case for why Trump should be acquitted, the president’s lawyers mentioned Schiff’s name almost 100 times.

They accused the congressman of running an “unheard of procedure that denied the president any semblance of fair process,” accused him of lying and of personally orchestrating the whistleblower complaint that led to the impeachment probe.

Congressional Republicans have intensified those critiques since the start of Trump’s trial this week, accusing him of misstating the evidence against the president and running a hasty and unfair investigation.

Trump, who denies wrongdoing and denounces the impeachment process as a sham, joined that criticism on Thursday, calling the congressman “Shifty Schiff” and saying his presentation to the Senate was “loaded with lies and misrepresentations.” Then he retweeted a series of attacks from other Republicans.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

A spokesman for Schiff had no immediate comment on the Republican attacks. Schiff has said in response to past salvos from Trump that the president “would much rather attack others than answer for his own conduct.”

Democrats contend that senators should convict Trump on two charges brought by the Democratic-led House - abuse of power for pressuring Ukraine to investigate Biden, and obstruction of Congress for his actions to impede a House inquiry into the matter.

But the Senate, which is controlled by Trump's fellow Republicans, remains unlikely to convict him. A two-thirds majority is needed to remove him from office.

"It is not common you would personally attack a prosecutor," said Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School in Los Angeles. "But we are not in a courtroom. We are in a political theater - emphasis on theater."

Standing at a lectern in the well of the Senate, Schiff told the 100 senators acting as jurors in the trial that Trump had tried to “cheat” his way to victory in November's election, and that he had shown he “believes that he’s above the law and scornful of constraint.”

Schiff, 59, and his fellow Democrats will have one final chance on Friday to make their case before Trump's legal team takes the floor on Saturday to rebut the evidence.Trump's team is expected to continue to focus its attacks on Schiff.

LEADING ROLE IN INVESTIGATION

Trump and his allies have targeted Schiff with particular intensity since the autumn, when he took leadership of the impeachment investigation.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Trump has branded the California lawmaker a “lowlife,” a “liar” and a “pencil-neck,” and once suggested that Schiff should perhaps be arrested for treason.

Schiff, who represents a Los Angeles district, is a former federal prosecutor and a political ally of House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi.

Over the past two years, he became a prolific defender of the government’s investigation into Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election. In March, all the Republicans on the intelligence panel he heads asked that he resign.     

Schiff has had a leading role in making the Democrats’ case before the Senate, delivering their opening argument and weaving together detailed accounts of testimony from Trump aides and others about the administration’s efforts to secure investigations in Ukraine.  

Republican Senator John Kennedy said Schiff’s presentation was eloquent. Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, one of Trump’s closest allies in the chamber, told reporters before the trial resumed on Thursday that Schiff and the other Democrats “did a good job of taking bits and pieces of the evidence and creating a quilt out of it.”

For his part, Schiff thanked senators at the end of Thursday's eight-hour session for "keeping an open mind about all of the issues that we are presenting."

Still, there has been no sign he has moved any Republicans to vote for a conviction. But Schiff has another audience for his eloquence - American voters who will decide on Nov. 3 whether to re-elect Trump.

Latest comments

People dont get locked up for nothing ask the Mueller JailBirds ?! Schiff could just wave his finger around the room of all the Cover up artist here ! Guilty !
Let us not forget this congress has written more subpeonas than laws... republics will win 21 seats and the retain the whote house and senate... the impeachment is a last stab effort to overturn an election they lost... best of luck woth biden or one of the communists
They have actually written plenty of bills - most with bi-partisan support. The only reason you don't hear about them is because Moscow Mitch isn't doing his job and is just letting them all sit on his desk to gather dust. It seems he's more interested in obstructing progress than in doing his job.
Couldn't help but laugh at Senator Kennedy's comment, "did a good job of taking bits and pieces of the evidence and creating a quilt out of it." What do you do with a quilt?... you cover up!
The article calls these "Democratic lawmakers"... Democrat, yes but they're anything and far from democratic. This is the "Hack-Pack" led by bag-o-bones, followed up by bugsy and the lollypop clan.
Joe and Hunter Biden will be called.  Then to jail with him and all of the current dem leaders and ex-leaders when the facts come out.  Why do you think they are fighting and lying so hard?  Hating Trump is not impeachable.  Get over it.... winning!!!!
There's absolutely no valid reason for them to testify as they are not material witnesses to what Trump is accused of doing. If you want them to be tried for some crime that you think they've committed then that would be a totally separate investigation and trial. Trying to rope them into Trump's Impeachment trial is just a typical example of Republican "distract and deflect" tactics when they have no way of actually mounting a real defense case. It's actually a pretty desperate measure.
Trumpkins lost the fight a long time ago. The fell hook, line and sinker for the stinker in chief. Now they just come here and peddle heresay given their lack of critical thinking.
Schiff has the facts on his side. Anyone who denies it is simply lying to protect our criminal President.
So where do you get these "facts" from? Bystanders? Someone told you? Get a grip...
Name one fact.  Just one.
Evil liar Schiff must be subpoena and face the consequences: Jail!
why dont the reps call their own witnesses then
an excellent question. Rita please answer.
Okay, Rita but I think thou mean indictment as Durham will most likely request. Does that help Marc?Just a small wait for a whole chain gang...
Schiff will pay for his lies. The Dems are corrupt and once this over we will see it exposed. I look forward the coming day of reckoning for the evil they spread.
why dont the reps call their own witnesses then
dont try bringing logic into this especially with the people on these articles on this site it never leads to an educated discussion just insults
Randall your intelligence shows with comments like this.
He,s playing his part in this stage act. He wants to “WOW” his audiance, whoever that is.
why dont the reps call their own witnesses then
Parrot the same, lame answer as many times as you wish. See my response to Rita -
No bias here.
Due Process of law begins at the hearing not the Senate. Total sham.
Why do u keep saying that? The House hearings did follow due process.They were for hearing evidence not for making a case to a judge or jury. Due process was followed.
if there was due process then why didnt the house let the President call witnesses or allow cross examination without stifling most questions that were relevant??? I say NO due process whatsoever...
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.