Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

Trump campaign challenges election results in Wisconsin Supreme Court

Published 12/01/2020, 11:14 AM
Updated 12/01/2020, 07:15 PM
© Reuters. A supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump waves a "Trump 2020" flag in Madison

© Reuters. A supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump waves a "Trump 2020" flag in Madison

By Makini Brice and Tom Hals

(Reuters) - U.S. President Donald Trump's campaign filed a petition on Tuesday challenging Wisconsin's presidential vote results with the state's supreme court, the latest in a series of so-far unsuccessful attempts to reverse Democrat Joe Biden's victory in the Nov. 3 election.

The petition was submitted as Trump-appointed U.S. Attorney General William Barr said on Tuesday that the Justice Department found no evidence of widespread voter fraud.

The Republican's campaign and his supporters' efforts have sputtered in challenges to Biden victories in Arizona, Pennsylvania, Georgia, Michigan and Nevada, even with a judiciary reshaped by the president.

The petition alleges that Wisconsin election officials were directed to fill in missing information on ballot envelopes, issued absentee ballots without receiving applications and allowed people to improperly claim a "confined" absentee voting status.

The petition takes issue with election officials in Madison hosting an event where officials collected and checked ballots in city parks, not polling stations.

On Monday, Wisconsin certified Biden as winner of the state. The campaign is seeking withdrawal of that certification.

Election law experts said the case might have better chances than other recent lawsuits but the court is highly unlikely to grant the campaign's request to invalidate 221,323 absentee ballots. Biden won Wisconsin by about 20,000 votes.

The court's conservative majority might find that some election rules were broken but it also might determine it can't penalize voters because state officials made procedural mistakes, said Ned Foley of Ohio State University Moritz College of Law.

Even if successful, the campaign would still need to overturn the results in several other states. Jessica Levinson, a professor at Loyola Law School, said Trump’s legal challenges have been “a fundraising juggernaut,” providing a motive for filing long-shot cases.

A spokesman for the Wisconsin Supreme Court said there was no timeline for deciding to take the case.

Also on Tuesday, a Republican member of Congress, Mike Kelly, and other Republican plaintiffs said they asked the U.S. Supreme Court to review a Saturday ruling by Pennsylvania's high court dismissing their case. They had sought to nullify Pennsylvania's certification of Biden's victory.

© Reuters. A supporters of U.S. President Donald Trump waves a

Alan Ball (NYSE:BLL), a professor at Marquette University who studies the Wisconsin Supreme Court, said the justices were unlikely to side with Trump given that it seems obvious Biden won the election. "It's hard to imagine that the court would relish jumping into something this futile now."

Latest comments

Losers! no wonder the biggest loser keeps saying he won.
It is just another fundraising event for Trump. People are so gullible to be scammed.
Its all on video, slam dunk in most states once it gets pushed beyond activist Obama benches. How about project veritas releasing 2 months worth of CNN internal meeting audio. Lol. Democrat sychophants wont care they are proven to be fed slanted trash...as long as it tickles their ears.
".....slam dunk in most states once it gets pushed beyond activist Obama benches."  ---  https://www.foxnews.com/politics/federal-appeals-court-dismisses-trump-campaign-lawsuit-pennsylvania-voting-procedures  ------  "......a panel of federal appeals judges in Pennsylvania dismissed the campaign's lawsuit over alleged voter fraud in the presidential election..............The three judges on the panel were all appointed by Republican presidents.   “Free, fair elections are the lifeblood of our democracy. Charges of unfairness are serious. But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here,” Judge Stephanos Bibas, a Trump appointee, wrote in his ruling.
and note the news article is from FoxNews, and they added this little gem at the end............"Giuliani held a public hearing alongside Trump on Wednesday and alleged that Republicans were denied the opportunity to observe the canvassing process, with Trump claiming they have "hundreds and hundreds of affidavits" of witnesses' personal stories to back their argument up.   However, the so-called proof has not been presented during numerous court hearings, with judges repeatedly ruling against the Trump campaign."
Lol is this still going on?
Another five minute decision to come barating Trump for bring anothersuit with no evidence before a court. Just like all the other baseless cases so far.
These People still going at it !?!?!? 🤦🏽‍♂️ delusion at its finest
Trump can sure make people into mindless zealots. He can be a televangelist after Jan 21.
Well he already thinks he is God.
Yes. Like falwell he is cery well qualified !
Republicans can't comprehend that they lost fairly
I wonder how many Republicans voted by mail and in person as Trump suggested?
They arent even carrying American flags anymore, just Trump flags. History attempts to repeat itself.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.