Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Whistleblower offers Republicans testimony as Trump pushes for unmasking

Published 11/03/2019, 10:22 PM
Updated 11/03/2019, 10:22 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to New York

By Doina Chiacu and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. official whose whistleblower complaint led to the impeachment inquiry against President Donald Trump offered to communicate directly with Republicans on the intelligence committee leading the inquiry, his lawyers said on Sunday.

The action was in response to Republican efforts, led by Trump, to unmask the whistleblower, a member of the U.S. intelligence community whose identity has not been released, lawyer Mark Zaid said.

Republicans have "sought to expose our client's identity which could jeopardize their safety, as well as that of their family," Zaid wrote on Twitter.

News of the offer came as Trump called on the whistleblower to come forward, in a stark departure from norms in such cases.

"The Whistleblower got it sooo wrong that HE must come forward," Trump said in a morning Twitter post.

Later outside the White House, Trump called the whistleblower an "Obama guy" and a fraud and said, "The whistleblower should be revealed."

Republicans have complained the impeachment inquiry in the Democratic-led House of Representatives has been unfair to them and to Trump, and that they have been restricted in their questioning of witnesses. The inquiry has followed established House rules.

The Republican president is under increasing pressure as the House of Representatives forges ahead with its investigation of whether Trump solicited help from Ukraine as he seeks re-election next year.

Leaders of the Democratic-controlled House expect to begin public hearings in the next few weeks.

Three officials in the White House Office of Management and Budget will not appear for depositions requested for this week by House investigators, an administration official has said.

The inquiry was launched on Sept. 24 after a whistleblower complaint from the unidentified U.S. intelligence official who was concerned the president's actions on Ukraine were illegal and jeopardized national security.

As the inquiry enters its sixth week, however, the whistleblower's testimony, based on second-hand information provided by other U.S. officials, is not likely to be the most important.

Lawmakers leading the inquiry have since heard first-hand accounts from U.S. officials including former National Security Council member Alexander Vindman that describe Trump's efforts to pressure Ukraine to investigate the 2020 Democratic candidate Joe Biden and his son Hunter, as well as accusations he used $391 million in U.S. aid as leverage.

A White House summary of a phone call between Trump and Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskiy showed Trump asking his Ukrainian counterpart to investigate the Bidens.

Democrat Adam Schiff, the House Intelligence Committee chairman, said last month the whistleblower's testimony might not be necessary.

The whistleblower initially offered to answer questions in writing if submitted by the House Intelligence Committee as a whole.

Zaid said the new offer, made on Saturday to top intelligence panel Republican Devin Nunes, reflected the client's desire to have the complaint handled in a nonpartisan way.

"Let me be absolutely clear: Our willingness to cooperate has not changed. What we object to and find offensive, however, is the effort to uncover the identity of the whistleblower," added Andrew Bakaj, another of the whistleblower's lawyers.

Nunes' office did not return a request for comment.

Longstanding Intelligence Committee policy is to protect whistleblowers' anonymity.

Trump has repeatedly lashed out at the whistleblower and called for his identity to be made public. He denies any impropriety and says the impeachment is politically motivated.

"They have the right to remain anonymous," Schiff said after Vindman's deposition last week.

Trump on Sunday said Schiff cannot be trusted to release accurate transcripts of testimony by witnesses in the inquiry, saying on Twitter that the congressman was "a proven liar, leaker & freak, who is really the one who should be impeached!"

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: President Donald Trump departs the White House en route to New York

Republican lawmakers should "give their own transcripts of the interviews to contrast with Schiff’s manipulated propaganda," he added.

Latest comments

If they want to call it 'News', it better be factual and substantiated. Otherwise call it a an opinion or may be talk show, or entertainment. Shouting 'Fire' when there is none in a full theatre, is not protected by freedom of speech. So most news today is FAKE and calling it 'News' is illegal.
the Russia collusion hoax fell apart, so they had to fabricate something else to fill the 24/7 news cycle since the DNC 2020 candidates are garbage and they need something to distract from that circus
The press isn't running the country, hmm. Technically that's true, but since they influence public opinion heavily, and to be fair they do it to all ideologies. They certainly are at the top of the food chain. I believe all of the press has become a stranger to the truth. So who is really informed, I would submit to you, no one. The press has always pushed an agenda since the beginning of our Republic. They are like puppet masters, but I do agree they should be free to say what they want. It is up to the by and large uninterested masses to decipher what is true or isn't. After all most people want to escape the reality of the truth. Most folks would rather watch reality TV. Why is that? I know, do you.
Fair comment, Ron.
This process HAS NOT followed established norms!!! Chairman Schiff overruling certain questions, not allowing Republicans members to call witnesses, not having the Judiciary Committee handle the investigation, ETC. This is political theater and your reporting is what leads to the criticism of "fake news." And, I don't agree with characterization of the as "fake," but is certainly misleading, incomplete and biased!!!
all that this did was solidify the republicans and knock biden out of the race
trump wishes to offer a bribe to the whistleblower, what? what?
impeachment inquiry is a joke. what has been done for our country nothing.
It's called Due process of LAW. Something Fake news knows nothing about.
Russian bot @ work again.
I made a simple statement. I was not being partisan, l was referring to the news media as a whole. I do not get my information from Fox or CNN! I research information for myself, not from Facebook. Frankly the only thing I care about is what the market does. I don't care who is running the country, as long as they make good decisions for MY bottom line. After all this is a financial website correct? I came on the site to analyze GE and here I am reading an article about politics and unless I am not the person you are referring to, now I am getting called a russian bot. The charge is ridiculous and mentally bankrupt. The only thing I am guilty of is reading the article in the first place, and stating my opinion about all media, not left or right.
ya, but u didn't have to read the article
"did you coordinate with schiff?".... and case will be closed
Sorry, I don't know what this has to do with Obama, or who that whistle-blower is that you just referred to. As for Schiff's staffer meeting with the current whistle-blower, what of it? If all he did was explain what the reporting process is then there's absolutely nothing wrong. However, like I've said elsewhere, if Schiff or his staff dictated to the whistle-blower what to say in his report, I would agree that's a very different scenario. But to my knowledge there has been no proof of that. And furthermore, it's almost irrelevant now that several other witnesses, who had first-hand info, have given their testimony.
okay im sure the word for word transcript will be where all that secret evidence is. just like the russia collusion evidence. get over it, you lost 2016. rather than focusing on this non-sense go worry about the DNC collapsing and having no viable candidates for 2020. this has already backfired for the DNC and knocked out Biden. Trump comes out ahead yet again.
Trump always comes out ahead because that's what it's all about Trump
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.