Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Trump proposes rule for importing drugs from Canada; industry says it won't cut costs

Published 12/18/2019, 02:44 PM
Updated 12/18/2019, 02:44 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A woman stops to take a photo of the U.S. and Canadian flags placed side-by-side on the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House in Washington

By Michael Erman and Carl O'Donnell

NEW YORK (Reuters) - The Trump administration on Wednesday said it is proposing a rule to allow states to import prescription drugs from Canada, advancing a plan announced in July that the president has said will bring cheaper prescription drugs to Americans.

Importation of drugs from Canada to lower costs for U.S. consumers has been considered for years. Alex Azar, secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), called the move "a historic step forward in efforts to bring down drug prices and out-of-pocket costs."

Industry trade groups in both countries opposed the plan, saying it will not lower costs and could hurt Canada's drug supplies. Groups representing pharmaceutical and biotech companies called the proposal a political gesture.

Azar said HHS would offer guidance to drugmakers that wish to voluntarily bring drugs they sell more cheaply in other countries into the United States for sale here.

The pathways for importation were announced in July, when Azar unveiled a "Safe Import Action Plan."

The proposed rule still needs to pass through a 75-day comment period before being finalized, Azar said.

"We're moving as quickly as we possibly can," he added.

Governors of states including Florida, Maine, Colorado, Vermont and New Hampshire have already expressed interest in importing drugs from Canada once the pathway is fully in place, Azar said. States would be required to explain how any proposed drug imports would reduce drug prices for consumers.

Jim Greenwood, head of biotech industry trade group BIO and a former Republican congressman, said importation would not result in lower prices for consumers, citing nonpartisan budget experts and past U.S. Food and Drug Administration commissioners.

​ "Today's announcement is the latest empty gesture from our elected lawmakers who want us to believe they're serious about lowering patients’ prescription drug costs," Greenwood said in a statement.

CANADA DRUG SUPPLY 'INSUFFICIENT' FOR U.S. MARKET

The Canadian government criticized the plan. Its U.S. ambassador said last month that importing medicines from Canada would not significantly lower U.S. prices. Reuters previously reported that Canada had warned U.S. officials it would oppose any import plan that might threaten the Canadian drug supply or raise costs for Canadians.

"Our government will protect our supply of and access to medication that Canadians rely on," said Alexander Cohen, a spokesman for Canada's Minister of Health.

"We continue to be in communication with the White House and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and our message remains firm: we share the goal of ensuring people can get and afford the medication they need – but these measures will not have any significant impact on prices or access for Americans."

The plan also drew pushback from Canadian drug distributors.

"The drug supply is insufficient for the Canadian market, let alone trying to divert it to a much larger market like the U.S.," said Daniel Chiasson, president of the Canadian Association for Pharmacy Distribution Management.

Speaking to reporters in Florida on Wednesday, Azar said Canadians' cheaper drug prices were the result of a free ride off of American investment and innovation.

"Obviously the Canadians are going to be looking out for Canadians," he said. "We're here to put American patients first."

Many prescription medicines would be excluded from importation from Canada, such as biologic drugs, including insulin, controlled substances and intravenous drugs.

U.S. President Donald Trump, a Republican, has struggled to deliver on a pledge to lower drug costs for U.S. consumers. Healthcare costs are expected to be a major focus of Trump's re-election campaign and for Democrats vying to run against him in the November 2020 election.

The Trump administration in July scrapped an ambitious policy that would have required health insurers to pass billions of dollars in rebates they receive from drugmakers to Medicare patients.

Also in July, a federal judge struck down a Trump administration rule that would have forced pharmaceutical companies to include wholesale prices of their drugs in television advertising.

Both the House of Representatives and the Senate are putting forth drug pricing bills that contain some of the proposals Trump has advocated, such as basing public drug reimbursements on foreign drug costs.

Trump has said he will veto the Democratic-led House bill if it comes to his desk on the grounds that it would slow innovation.

"Once again, the Trump White House is tip-toeing around big pharma with a spectacularly pinched and convoluted proposal that excludes insulin and has no actual implementation date," said Henry Connelly, a spokesman for U.S. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A woman stops to take a photo of the U.S. and Canadian flags placed side-by-side on the Eisenhower Executive Office Building next to the White House in Washington

"If President Trump actually wants to lower drug prices, he should pick up the phone and tell Senator McConnell to send him the House-passed Lower Drug Costs Now Act."

Latest comments

I love all the people that bash Canada’s healthcare system, yet they all want the drug prices that that system yields.
"We're moving as quickly as we possibly can,"  That hurt. I was drinking milk when I read this line, and it shot out my nose clear across the room. The pharma executives need warn people when their going to say such hilariously ridiculous things. People could be drinking milk!
The "house" is not credible. look at the lies they tell - Trump is actually working best plan. Look at the d-weeds trying to impeach so they can uh do an election. Perhaps when the house is retaken, some federal laws will change -
YES Chris!
Perhaps when Moscow Mitch finally does his job some laws will change. The House has passed several good bills but Mitch McConnell has refused to even bring them to the floor for debate. He's more interested in trying to make the Dems look bad than passing good bills that help Americans.
Get rid of for profit health care. Eliminate patents for life saving drugs like insulation and any drug that was developed using taxpayer funding.
doing that would *****the drive towards medical research no commercial company would spend the money and time for R&D if they wouldnt make profit. costs will be lower but say goodbye to the idea of finding a cure for cancer or alzheimers
 . . How about if drugs are the same price world wide so the entire world equally supports the R&D? Crazy idea huh?
Buzzy, I guess you haven't traveled much outside North America. It's a nice idea but the reality is there are many counties where there's no way the average person would be able to afford the most basic pharmaceuticals if all countries had to pay the same amount. Either that, or the prices would have to be lowered so much that the companies' profits would take a huge hit. By the way, you do realize that what you're proposing is a form of 'socialism' that you hate so much, right?
so now thanks to trumpy medicine more expensive in canada now
you want everything free too- sad
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.