Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Prominent Senate Republican warns Trump trial could spark more impeachments

Published 01/23/2021, 03:43 PM
Updated 01/23/2021, 07:20 PM
© Reuters. Senate panel holds confirmation hearing for Biden's U.S. spy chief choice

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A prominent U.S. Senate Republican warned on Saturday that former President Donald Trump's second impeachment trial could lead to the prosecution of former Democratic presidents if Republicans retake the chamber in two years.

"If it is a good idea to impeach and try former Presidents, what about former Democratic Presidents when Republicans get the majority in 2022? Think about it and let's do what is best for the country," Senator John Cornyn, a 19-year veteran of the Senate, said in a Twitter post directed at Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer.

Trump this month became the first U.S. president to be impeached twice after the Democratic-controlled House, with the support of 10 Republicans, voted to charge him with incitement of insurrection for a fiery Jan. 6 speech to his followers before they launched a deadly assault on the Capitol.

After a brief moment of bipartisan sentiment in which members from both parties condemned the unprecedented attack on Congress as it met to formalize President Joe Biden's victory, a number of Senate Republicans are opposing Trump's trial, which could lead to a vote blocking him from future office.

Democrats hold narrow majorities in the House of Representatives and Senate, and it is common for the incumbent president's party to lose seats in the mid-term elections two years after a presidential contest.

Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky has said the mob was "provoked" by Trump. But other Senate Republicans say that trying Trump while out of office would be unconstitutional and further divide the country.

The Kentucky Republican Party's state central committee rejected a resolution on Saturday that urged McConnell to fully support Trump and condemn his impeachment, the Louisville Courier Journal reported. The committee voted 134-49 to uphold a ruling that the resolution was out of order, the paper said.

The party's spokesman did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

There are concerns on both sides of the aisle that the trial could distract from Biden's legislative agenda.

© Reuters. Senate panel holds confirmation hearing for Biden's U.S. spy chief choice

Schumer, who became Senate majority leader this week, said on Friday the impeachment trial would start the week of Feb. 8. That will give both sides time to prepare while the Senate works to confirm Biden's Cabinet and enact a new COVID-19 relief package, he said.

Latest comments

The USA forgot they made from all nationalities.How they became alliances?It’s called mental maturity.Even in 3021 humans never have pure peace.
Sniffer is next to be Impeached
he is saying senators are partisan politicians and not qualified to be impartial judge..calling armed supporters to storm your legislative branch is clearly wrong and should be dealt as such Just think what it means if you get away and next populist politicians will repeat again ****senators inside?
Term Limits Now
constitutional convention is the only way it'll happen. Read article 5 of the constitution.
I believe Trump should be impeached and then Biden for crimes he committed as Vice President. Start over.
I am more worried about "more Trumps" in the future if he is not impeached.
In the end dollars spent by businesses will either be pasted through as price increases to consumers or reduction in work force. What's interesting is that an increase to an expense reduces taxable income at theoretically a higher tax rate reducing money to the government while those getting the income will pay less in taxes. Amazing how in the end how debits and credits work.
People just don't understand business. They don't care about closing down the pipe line and raising min wage to 15 on a federal level.... they don't understand how bad the inflation would be. it was fun wile it lasted..... Save your penny'sthis will be a wild ride....
if that were true the minimum wage would be a dollar an hour.
it's up to the states for a reason Betty eats breakfast in ohio for 4$Betty gos to Florida has breakfast for 12$betty gos to California and breakfast was 20$ literly same meal how can u federalized a minimum without hearing the system in a very bad way..
impacting the system
GOP is dead.  New party emerging.  Don't believe me?  Put your ear on the rail, it's coming down the track
Divide the Republican party ****yeah! Once Democrats end voter suppression Republicans will never get elected again.
1 party system is the only thing worse than a 2 party system. Federal government would explode in size and power and your freedoms with it.
Chuck, you're correct. But nobody is advocating for a 1-party system. Just accurate representation of the electorate. Even if it were true that Republicans didn't win control again, they would still have a voice in Congress, so not the same as a 1-party system.
He's worried that he and all of his GOP buddies are on a short clock for not defending the President and 75 MILLION VOTERS.  This one already a RINO
Not good news for Billy boy...
LOL! One small problem with the idea: double jeopardy applies. And Clinton can't be President again because he actually served two terms.
What about the Epstein ranch?
What about it?
Robert, what he warning about id the investigation of Biden quo-pro quod of the Potus while he was VP and his son could lead to him.... think about that.. Dont let them put you in the blue box or red bix. Think independently. Thry want you to think about that but sweep things like Hillary illegal used of private server under the carpet.
and the use by members of the Trump administration and their secret e mail accounts, especially his daughter and son in law.
I cannot believe that is the thought of a person in charge of a public office. What Trump did needs to be addressed by the Law to deter future acts like that. Just because Democrats are impeaching him for clearly breaking the Law does not mean Republicans have the right to impeach any former Democratic president without reasonable justifications. The hypocrisy of Republicans is in full display here, they claim they observe the rule of law yet when it comes to Trump they want everyone including Democrats to overlook his crooked behaviors.
The problem is Trump did not clearly break the law as you say, for the most part he's guilty of not discouraging what happened.  As well, I'm sure the republicans can find reasonable justifications against impeaching even Obama, especially if we use your standard of "clearly breaking the law".  Just look at the democrats, including Kamala, who bailed out protestors that continue to damage the property and disrupt the lives of hard working Americans, that alone could be called a reasonable justification for impeachment.
Anyone is found to breaj the law should face the consequences. Whether its Obama or Trump. That is my point. If there is evidence then let the law work. And as for your of point of Trump not breaking the law, sounds like something a dishonest person will say.
Roger miller seems to support mobs and sedition.
They do it because China n the left want to impeach Trump. It started by a chinese. That says all.
that"s quite a lie. it makes you look a little weak upstairs if you beliveve it. or a true believer of the trump cult. Trump's lies and deeds are the reason he's being impeached. his seditious actions attempt at election fraud and attempted coup are the reasons for his impeachment.
the crime was done when he was in office, on duty. so, no pseudo excuse that he is not anymore president. it would be like if you prosecute a doctor for malpractice that killed your wife...and...sorry man, i am retire now. catch me uf you can.politician are responsible for their acts. Finally it would be great to prosecute polluticians (🤭) for their acts. He should be as well prosecute for all the deaths of covid because of his ego and complete ignorance and sens of responsability. At least a dozen of counts making him either in jail for 30 years or psychiatric detention till death. excellent choice, Sir !!🥴🤔😂
biden IS THE CROOK
what's the matter Jay .things not going your way. you sound desperate.
Its best to just sue this guy over his tax and fraudulent activities. There are plenty enough things to get him to pay.
His Fraudulency, Chairman Xiden?
What, go after the President that "did not have ********with that woman" and now can't have ********with that woman?
Every repressive autocrat needs to be impeached. What's there to warn about?
Time to vote this guy out
Good points, Senator Cornyn
okay. let trial every president when your side control the house....starting in 1776....world will enjoy the show.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.