Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Pennsylvania cannot reject mail-in ballots due to signature discrepancy: state court

Published 10/23/2020, 03:55 PM
Updated 10/23/2020, 09:26 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A U.S. Postal Service (USPS) post office in Philadelphia

By Costas Pitas

(Reuters) - Pennsylvania's Supreme Court ruled on Friday that mail-in ballots cannot be refused because a voter's signature does not appear to match the one on file, a decision that could help Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden.

Pennsylvania is a battleground state whose 20 Electoral College votes are key to victory for both Republican President Donald Trump and Biden.

"(We) hold that county boards of elections are prohibited from rejecting absentee or mail-in ballots based on signature comparison conducted by county election officials or employees, or as the result of third-party challenges based on signature analysis and comparisons," Pennsylvania's top court ruled.

Democrats hailed the move while Republicans were critical.

"What if there’s no signature at all? Or someone just draws a line? Sounds pretty stupid," the digital director for Trump's 2020 campaign, Gary Coby, wrote on Twitter.

Many states have expanded early voting and the use of mail-in ballots ahead of the Nov. 3 election, as some Americans try to avoid crowded polls during the coronavirus pandemic.

Trump has repeatedly attacked mail-in voting, claiming without evidence that it will lead to widespread fraud. Democrats have argued it is a safe, reliable alternative to in-person voting.

So far, Democrats have voted in much larger numbers than Republicans in states which record party registration, including Pennsylvania, according to data from the U.S. Elections Project at the University of Florida.

The Pennsylvania case is one of hundreds of court battles being fought over voting rules and procedures.

The decision was welcomed by state Attorney General Josh Shapiro, a Democrat.

"Another win for voters in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court today," he wrote on Twitter, adding that the state's voter identification system is "safe and secure."

© Reuters. A supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump holds a campaign sign outside the Republican headquarters in Union City, Pennsylvania

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday allowed Alabama to ban curbside voting for voters with disabilities and those who face a high risk of contracting COVID-19, and an Iowa court upheld a law that makes it harder to fix problems with absentee ballot requests.

Latest comments

why bother signing ballots then?
Make sure we can cheat as much as we need to win
Just proves the Democrats rely on the M*O*R*O*N vote... Reading through this thread only reinforces this fact. lol
Fascists rigging elections in The US.. what could possibly go wrong?
I think the election will be contested by both sides unless there is like a 20% margin between the candidates. We’ve had recounts in America before, but we’ve never had people contest an election result like I fear they will this year.
They have to do this so they can cheat to win... why wpuld anyone be against ensuring the voter is the voter and securing the election system??
Trump set up a commission on voter fraud and it was disbanded because it was so rare. Much more likely is local Republican controlled election officials throwing out votes for Democrats. Also these officials are not handwriting experts. Why should we expect them to make the right call?
voters have to resort to this so they dont fear intimidation by a bunch of trump_t.a.r.d.s at the polls
Hmmmmmm, considering it was the Democrat supporters that did that in 2016, the fact that they tore up their cities rioting. Then you take the Republican voters who haven't done any of that. And it makes your point that much more ignorant. If there is going to be voter suppression by any group, it will undoubtedly be Dems.
Your ignorance is showing Mr. Patron.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.