Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Democrats zoom in on Trump impeachment charges this week

Published 12/08/2019, 03:18 PM
Updated 12/08/2019, 03:18 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington

By Doina Chiacu and David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic lawmakers could vote this week on articles of impeachment against President Donald Trump, the House Judiciary Committee chairman said on Sunday as lawmakers sharpened their focus on charges of wrongdoing in his dealings with Ukraine.

U.S. Representative Jerrold Nadler said the panel will not decide on the specific articles until after a hearing on Monday to consider evidence gathered by the House Intelligence Committee in its investigation of the Republican leader.

"There are possible drafts that various people are writing," Nadler told CNN's "State of the Union." "But the fact is we're not going to make any decision as to how broad the articles should be - as to what they contain, what the wording is - until after the hearing tomorrow."

The Democratic-led House of Representatives' impeachment inquiry focuses on Trump's request that Ukraine investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a leading contender for the Democratic nomination to face Trump in the November 2020 election.

Nadler told NBC's "Meet the Press" that articles of impeachment would be brought to the panel later in the week. Asked on CNN if lawmakers could vote this week, he said, "It's possible."

The impeachment probe has focused on a July 25 telephone call in which Trump asked Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy to open an investigation into Biden and his son Hunter, and into a discredited theory promoted by Trump and his allies that Ukraine, not Russia, meddled in the 2016 election.

Trump denies wrongdoing and says the impeachment inquiry is a politically motivated witchhunt aimed at ousting him.

Democrats cite "overwhelming" evidence that Trump put his personal interests above those of the country in seeking foreign help to win the November 2020 election.

"I think the case we have, if presented to a jury, would be a guilty verdict in about three minutes flat," Nadler said.

MUELLER PART OF IMPEACHMENT CHARGES?

Democratic lawmakers on Sunday played down the possibility of basing one of the articles of impeachment on Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian election interference in 2016. That report cited 10 incidents in which Trump sought to hinder the investigation, but did not draw conclusions on whether Trump obstructed justice.

The best strategy, intelligence panel Chairman Adam Schiff told CBS' "Face the Nation," is to pick the charges supported by "the strongest and most overwhelming evidence and not try to charge everything, even if you could charge other things."

"Nobody wants to put the kitchen sink into these articles," added Pramila Jayapal, a House Judiciary Democrat, in an interview with Reuters. "We need to be focused; we need to be clear. We need to present the best possible case."

House Democrats who must appeal to skeptical independent voters to get re-elected have expressed misgivings about supporting a charge of obstruction of justice based on Mueller.

Judiciary Committee Democrats have said they could instead use Mueller's findings to demonstrate a repeated pattern of misconduct by Trump to support formal charges of abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

"It's part of a pattern" that poses a threat to the integrity of the November 2020 election, Nadler said.

Judiciary Committee Democrats worked through the weekend poring over information from the Intelligence Committee and constitutional law scholars who testified on Wednesday.

Republicans are demanding that Nadler postpone Monday's hearing to give them time to review the material.

"It is impossible for Judiciary members to sift through thousands and thousands of pages in any meaningful way in a matter of hours," the committee's top Republican, Representative Doug Collins, told Nadler in a weekend letter.

Nadler dismissed the contention, saying that the documents presented on Saturday were basically the intelligence committee report released earlier in the week to both Republicans and Democrats.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler (D-NY) speaks at a news conference on Capitol Hill in Washington

Republican Matt Gaetz, a Trump supporter on the Judiciary Committee, told ABC the president's impeachment was "inevitable" as Republicans began to emphasize the vote margin as the thing to watch. They will not have any defectors, Republican lawmakers said on Sunday, but Democrats will be under increasing pressure to vote against impeachment.

Latest comments

Long live Comander Trump
dont they want to hear from more liberal professors who have long histories of hating trump before making their decision
read The Oracle. You'll understand everything.
Title should be “Democrats hand Trump the 2020 election on a silver platter”.
i think it can now officially be declared on a golden platter
What are the odds the republicans opt to oust trump and run with other names on the ticket?
Looks like Trump's time is near.
I expect the comittee to pass it since most of them r Dems. They and the house will drag their feet for a couple more months, just in time for the election
Show us your taxes, Mr Trump, as you promised us when you got elected. What you got to hide???
He has nothing to hide. And under no circumstances should he release his taxes, the IRS has gone through them and accepted them. If you want to ask for something, let's see Obama's college records.
You miss the point. They're not asking to see his taxes to make sure he filed them correctly. That's the job of the IRS as you said. The reason Trump should release his taxes is so that we can be sure that he doesn't have any major conflicts of interest, or any foreign power with financial leverage over him, that might cause him to act in his own interest rather than the interest of the country.
deceptive title, there is no gained momentum. democrats just going through the motions. facts do not matter they are just trying to interfere with the 2020 election since they know they have no legitimate chance.
What the Russians did was interfering. It's not "interfering" when it's a domestic issue and their following the Constitution. The Republicans are the ones for whom facts don't matter. That's why they keep trying to make this about 2016 or about Biden's son, negate they don't have a fact-based defense of the president.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.