Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Factbox: As Trump goes on trial, a fight over witnesses remains unresolved

Published 01/20/2020, 06:41 PM
Updated 01/20/2020, 06:41 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump hosts Apollo 11 astronauts to commemorate the moon landing's 50th anniversary at the White House in Washington

By Jan Wolfe

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump goes on trial in the U.S. Senate this week on charges he abused his office and obstructed Congress, with one of the most contentious questions still unresolved - should senators hear from witnesses?

Senate Democrats in the Republican-controlled chamber want four current and former Trump administration officials to testify. Democrats need at least four Republicans to join them to reach a majority of 51 senators to approve the subpoenas.

Many Republicans, however, want a speedy trial of Trump, their party leader, without witness testimony. Trump has at times said he wants to hear from witnesses, albeit not the same ones the Democrats want to testify.

Here are some of the potential witnesses in the trial.

JOHN BOLTON

Bolton is Trump's former national security adviser. Democrats believe he has first-hand knowledge of key decisions made to pressure Ukraine to investigate Trump's rival, Democratic presidential contender Joe Biden.

Congressional investigators believe Bolton objected to Trump’s decision to delay $390 million in military aid to Ukraine that is at the center of the impeachment case and could elaborate on that, a Senate aide told Reuters.

Bolton refused to participate in the House of Representatives impeachment investigation, but in a surprise development said on Jan. 6 that he was willing to testify in the Senate trial.

MICK MULVANEY

Democrats have argued that Mulvaney, Trump's acting White House chief of staff, was directly involved in withholding aid to Ukraine and has first-hand information to share.

Mulvaney in October acknowledged during a news conference that the White House withheld the money in order to push Ukraine to carry out the investigations sought by Trump, although he later reversed those comments.

Mulvaney was one of several Trump administration officials who defied subpoenas issued by the House when it was investigating Trump.

MICHAEL DUFFEY

Duffey is a political appointee in the White House budget office who oversees national security funds. Duffey ordered the Pentagon to freeze the security funding for Ukraine, according to publicly released government documents.

Duffey also did not cooperate with the House impeachment investigation.

ROBERT BLAIR

Blair is an assistant to Trump and a senior adviser to Mulvaney. Blair was on the line during a July 25 phone call between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy at the center of the impeachment inquiry. Like Mulvaney and Duffey, Blair defied a House subpoena for his testimony.

JOE BIDEN AND HUNTER BIDEN

Trump has alleged that when Biden was vice president he tried to have Ukraine’s then-chief prosecutor fired to stop him investigating Burisma, an energy company his son Hunter worked for. This claim has been widely debunked and Trump has offered no evidence to support the accusation.

Trump told reporters on Jan. 9 that he still wanted to hear from Biden and his son during the trial. Biden has accused Trump and his personal lawyer Rudy Giuliani of peddling “false, debunked conspiracy theories.”

Biden said on Dec. 28 that he would comply with a Senate subpoena but that there would be no legal basis for issuing one. He had been criticized for previously suggesting he would defy a Senate subpoena.

THE WHISTLEBLOWER

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Trump hosts Apollo 11 astronauts to commemorate the moon landing's 50th anniversary at the White House in Washington

Trump has said the Senate trial should include testimony from the whistleblower who prompted the impeachment inquiry by lodging a complaint with an internal government watchdog about Trump's July 25 phone call with Zelenskiy.

Latest comments

If Lindsey and Rudy testify theres a Huge chance ?! LOL
Sorry that ship has sailed. The constitution provides for a fair trial FOR THE PRESIDENT not for the dems. They have shredded the constitution for their own gain. Very dangerous and expect the Senate to take up their cause to remove a sitting President elected by the people. Vile and disgusting and shameful. The Senate will move swiftly to end this attack on our democracy.
You mean the Senate will turn a blind eye to facts in order to protect a Republican president. There is nothing unconstitutional about Impeachment of a sitting president. The impeachment process was written into the Constitution to remedy the situation of a sitting president abusing the power of the office (among other things). And yes, he deserves a fair trial which includes both sides being able to call relevant witnesses.
no evidence against the Bidens? this "news" organization is ignoring the facts. either you don't do your job or you just flat out lie. its sad that we cannot believe most mainstream news organizations being they have a political agenda. WHAT A JOKE!
"It's said that we cannot trust the mainstream media..."? Umm Trump is the one who started that whole narrative, and only because he felt under attack and had no better defense. Discrediting the media is the first on the agenda of any would-be dictator. Think about it.
And, an answer but not only incorrect but lacking actual facts. History is already written on poor ol' Joes son. All prior to Trump being in and would not have been discovered if Trump was not elected, awd was the "plan"...
You should invest in a dictionary, look up dictator, socialism, fascism, communism but especially Capitalism. If you're educated to history, failure, despair and mass death comes from socialism. Sauls plan: Break the bank, border and destroy religion is a short version.
It's not about lawfully fair anymore. It's all about globalist power. The impeachment is a false narrative and hoax perpetrated on the American people by a number of hacks that, for their lies should be charged, yried and pray the price. This will hopefully be the case when the Durham report comes out.
Wow, if any of you young libs at Reuters understood any of this you'd be dangerous, but this shows clearly that you don't
Reuters is a 170-year-old news organization built on the principles of fair reporting. Your comment not only is not ignorant of the very foundation of this institution but also extremely presumptuous that the person/people behind this story are "young libs", either in age or understanding of the subject matter. It clearly shows how dangerously ignorant you are about the facts of this case.
Fixing typo: Reuters is a 170-year-old news organization built on the principles of fair reporting. Your comment is not only ignorant of the very foundation of this institution but also extremely presumptuous that the person/people behind this story are "young libs", either in age or understanding of the subject matter. It clearly shows how dangerously ignorant you are about the facts of this case.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.