Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Democrat says Trump violated oath; Republicans attack 'partisan' impeachment probe

Published 12/09/2019, 11:24 AM
Updated 12/09/2019, 11:24 AM
© Reuters. House Judiciary Committee holds evidenciary hearing on Trump impeachment inquiry on Capitol Hill in Washington

By David Morgan

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The head of a U.S. congressional panel leading the impeachment inquiry against Donald Trump on Monday accused the Republican president of putting himself before his country and violating his oath of office.

In a statement kicking off a hearing in the U.S. House of Representatives to weigh the evidence against Trump, Judiciary Committee Democratic Chairman Jerrold Nadler said there was extensive proof of wrongdoing.

"The evidence shows that Donald J. Trump, the president of the United States, has put himself before his country. He has violated his most basic responsibilities to the people. He has broken his oath," Nadler said. "I will honor mine."

The hearing on Monday is a key step before determining charges, known as articles of impeachment, that the full Democratic-controlled House is likely to vote on before Christmas.

The heart of the issue is whether Trump abused his power by pressuring Ukraine to investigate former Vice President Joe Biden, a political rival seeking the Democratic nomination to face Trump in the 2020 election, and then obstructed Congress' investigation into the scandal.

Trump denies having done anything wrong and has called the impeachment probe a hoax.

The House Judiciary panel is expected to vote by the end of the week on whether to send formal charges to the full House.

That would set up an inevitable clash with the White House and its Republican allies, who argue that Democrats are on a mission to unseat a president who did nothing to merit impeachment.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

No current House Republican has come out in favor of impeaching Trump.

Representative Doug Collins, the ranking Republican on the panel, told the hearing that the impeachment process was being driven by "partisan policy differences" rather than actual evidence.

White House press spokeswoman Stephanie Grisham tweeted during the hearing that there was no evidence of wrongdoing by Trump and that "there's no obstruction whatsoever."

A vote in the House in favor of impeachment would trigger a trial in the Republican-controlled Senate where a two-thirds vote of those present would be needed to remove the president from office. A conviction is considered unlikely.

White House adviser Kellyanne Conway said the White House was not participating in the Judiciary panel's proceedings because cooperating would be "colluding with an illegitimate process."

"We're not going to do their dirty work," Conway told reporters at the White House shortly before the hearing began. "Maybe in the Senate if it's a fair trial," the White House may participate, she added.

It has been 20 years since Americans last witnessed impeachment proceedings, when Republicans brought charges against Democratic President Bill Clinton arising from a sexual relationship he had with a White House intern. He was acquitted in the Senate.

'BALONEY'

After weeks of investigation into Trump's request that Ukraine investigate Biden and his businessman son, Hunter Biden, the committee is focused on two articles charging Trump with abuse of power and obstruction of Congress.

Democrats have also accused Trump of abusing his power by withholding $391 million in security aid to Ukraine - a vulnerable U.S. ally facing Russian aggression - and holding back a coveted White House meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy as leverage to pressure Kiev into investigating the Bidens.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

But they appeared to back away from basing one of the articles of impeachment on former Special Counsel Robert Mueller's report on Russian election interference in 2016. Some Democrats believe Trump's campaign colluded with Moscow, an allegation that has been denied by Trump and was not established by Mueller's probe.

Barry Berke, a Democratic lawyer with the Judiciary Committee, alleged that Trump had engaged in repeated efforts to seek foreign influence in U.S. elections and then sought to stymie investigators who tried to uncover it.

“If, in fact, President Trump can get away with what he did again, our imagination is the only limit to what President Trump may do next or what a future president may do next, to try to abuse his or her power, to serve his own personal interest over the nation’s interest," Berke testified.

Stephen Castor, a Republican attorney, fired back by describing the impeachment inquiry as a tempest in a teapot that boiled down to a small part of Trump's July 25 phone call with Zelenskiy. It was during that call that Trump sought investigations of the Bidens and a debunked theory that it was Ukraine, not Russia, that interfered in the 2016 U.S. election.

"To impeach a president who 63 million people voted for over eight lines in a call transcript is baloney. Democrats seek to impeach president Trump, not because they have evidence of high crimes and misdemeanors, but because they disagree with his policies," Castor said.

Separately, the U.S. Justice Department's internal watchdog is expected to announce on Monday that the FBI, despite some mistakes, was legally justified in 2016 in opening its investigation into contacts between Trump's campaign and Russia, according to sources familiar with the findings.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Democrats intend to decide which articles to bring forward after Monday's hearing, which also showcased the findings of a 300-page report by Intelligence Committee Democrats that levels allegations of sweeping abuse of power against Trump.

Republicans have their own, 110-page report, which argues that the inquiry has relied on "unelected bureaucrats" who "fundamentally disagreed with President Trump's style, world view and decisions" but presented no evidence amounting to an impeachable offense.

Latest comments

Trump is a complete fraud! He will en up in jail for a long time
That last line makes the article unbiased.
What evidence? Nadler, Schiff and Pelosi belong in jail, they hate Trump and America.
Anyone with an IQ hates trump. Which I guess leaves you and the other supporters out.
Rita, hating Trump is not a crime. Sorry. However, eliciting a foreign power's help in your own upcoming election campaign is. It's as simple as that. Deal with it.
Maybe after trump is reelected they can actually investigate Baiden.
Pimpin, maybe they can, if there's any evidence (and so far nobody has any). However, if he needs to be investigated then it should be done separately. Senate Republicans trying to get him and Hunter to testify in Trump's Impeachment trial is just a desperate tactic of trying to distract from the actual impeachable acts that they can't defend.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.