Breaking News

UPDATE 3-German parties abandon "shadow budget" plan

Financial NewsOct 22, 2009 11:06AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items

* Experts say budget plan may violate constitution

* Alternative sought to make room for tax cuts

* Party leaders expect coalition deal by Friday

(adds party leaders saying deal near in paragraphs 3,5,6)

By Erik Kirschbaum and Noah Barkin

BERLIN, Oct 22 (Reuters) - Germany's incoming government has dropped its controversial plan to plug a hole in state finances with a "shadow budget" and is considering an alternative that would push up new borrowing next year, party officials said.

Chancellor Angela Merkel's conservatives and the pro business Free Democrats (FDP) won a parliamentary majority in last month's election and forged compromises on a range of issues, from nuclear energy to foreign policy and healthcare.

Several party leaders said after nine hours of talks on Thursday they were close to clinching a coalition deal after weeks of struggle to reconcile their promise of tax cuts with a separate pledge to bring Germany's budget deficit under control.

Merkel wants to be sworn in next week.

"We'll have a result Friday evening or Saturday morning at the latest," said Christian Wulff, a leader in her Christian Democrats, told reporters outside the talks. "There are a few open issues. It makes sense to take the time to get it right."

Peter Ramsauer, a leader in the CDU's Christian Social Union sister party added: "We're right on schedule. There's a few things we're stuck on. But we'll wrap it up by Friday evening."

In talks in recent days, the parties came up with the idea of using a special fund outside the federal budget to cover shortfalls of 50 billion euros ($75 billion) or more in state-run unemployment and health insurance schemes. As part of this plan, they wanted to pass a supplementary budget for 2009.

But they abandoned the idea after legal experts raised concerns that the plan, which drew sharp criticism from some economists and opposition parties, may violate Germany's "Basic Law", or post-war constitution.

"A supplementary budget for 2009 is off the table," Georg Fahrenschon, the conservative Finance Minister of Bavaria, told reporters after a round of coalition talks.

Wulff later defended the supplementary budget idea.

"It's normal to consider different ideas, check them out and then discard some of them," he said. "I think we're close to an agreement on the budget. There are three goals we agree on: tax relief, relieve pressure on budgets and invest in the future."

Under the alternative budget plan, discussed at Thursday's talks, 20 billion euros would be pumped in to cover the unemployment and healthcare shortfalls in 2010. The parties had yet to agree how to cover these shortfalls in subsequent years.

Borrowing would shoot up next year, but would then have to fall sharply to ensure the new government did not violate new "debt brake" rules.

Merkel's outgoing "grand coalition" pushed through new legislation this year capping federal new borrowing at 0.35 percent of gross domestic product from 2016. The law also obliges the government to reduce borrowing by 0.2 percentage points annually from 2011 to reach the 2016 goal.

Merkel must find an estimated 50 billion euros in order to deliver tax cuts expected to total about 20 billion euros.

But she has ruled out raising unemployment and healthcare contributions, paid by both companies and workers, to plug the budget hole because this would nullify the impact of tax cuts.

Merkel is also refusing to examine sharp cuts in government spending, worried that these would hurt her party's chances of holding on to power in a crucial state election due in May 2010. (Writing by Noah Barkin and Paul Carrel; Editing by Sonya Hepinstall and Elizabeth Fullerton) ($1=.6697 Euros)

UPDATE 3-German parties abandon "shadow budget" plan

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Post also to:
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Post 1000
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add Chart to Comment
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email