Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Extended Sale! Save on premium data with Claim 60% OFF

WTO needs progress on 'non-market' practices, dispute settlement -USTR's Tai

Published Sep 22, 2023 01:03PM ET Updated Sep 22, 2023 06:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai testifies before a Senate Finance Committee hearing on President Biden's trade policy agenda on Capitol Hill in Washington, U.S., March 31, 2022. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst

By David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -U.S. Trade Representative Katherine Tai on Friday called for meaningful progress in making changes to the World Trade Organization by a ministerial meeting in February, with better tools needed to handle China's "non-market" practices.

The U.S. was committed to a reformed WTO that was focused on its "foundational goals," marked by "openness, transparency, and fair-market-oriented competition", Tai said in remarks to a trade forum in Washington.

She said that in recent years, the WTO has failed to address non-market practices by some countries, seeking to "dominate key industrial sectors, promote national champions and discriminate foreign competitors, massively subsidize key sectors and manipulate cost structures."

Her remarks did not name China directly, but she later said she was referring to China.

"These practices are unfair and disadvantage workers in developed and developing countries, like the very people this system should be empowering and lifting up," Tai said at the Center for Strategic and International Studies event.

"Real conversations" were needed on how the WTO can address issues, Tai said.

The 13th Ministerial Meeting of the WTO is scheduled for Feb. 26-29 in Abu Dhabi. Tai called on the trade body's 164 member countries to "lock in" any reforms where they can find consensus, "rather than continue to preserve an unsatisfying status quo until some theoretical point in the future where we agree on everything."

The WTO is a consensus-based organization where any member country can block proposals, and negotiating rule changes has proven extremely difficult since its 1995 founding.

But there had been progress such as a deal last year to cut billions of dollars in harmful state fishery subsidies, which Tai cited as evidence that differences could be bridged.

WTO Director Ngozi Okonjo-Iweala, speaking at the same forum, insisted that the trade body's members were working through tough negotiation and said she was hoping for reform, including to the dispute settlement system, by February.

"We have a lot of work ahead to deal with level playing field issues, including trade distortions from industrial, agricultural and other subsidies," Okonjo-Iweala said. "And we certainly need to reform our dispute settlement system."

The United States has for years rendered the WTO's Appellate Body inoperable by blocking the appointment of new judges, arguing that the organization's dispute appeals process has overstepped its mandate.

"The United States wants a WTO where dispute settlement is fair and effective and supports a healthy balance of sovereignty, democracy, and economic integration," Tai said.

She said the U.S. also wants a WTO "where all members embrace transparency. Where we have better rules and tools to tackle non-market policies and practices and to confront the climate crisis and other pressing issues."

Tai has long pushed back against China's "non-market" economic and trade practices from China, raising fresh objections to its state-led approach during a late May meeting with Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao in Detroit. She also has long argued that China has failed to embrace the market-oriented principles that it committed to follow when it joined the WTO in 2001, and that the trade body has been unable to counter China's subsidies and support for state-owned enterprises.

WTO needs progress on 'non-market' practices, dispute settlement -USTR's Tai

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your profile, will be public on and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (2)
Derick Lim
Derick Lim Sep 23, 2023 11:21PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Is Tai looking at mirror when complaining?
Connecticut Yankee
A_Jaundiced_Eye Sep 22, 2023 6:35PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
If UAW wins its demands from the Big Three, auto prices will skyrocket in U.S. I want to hear what Ms. Tai says when Chinese automakers (Warren Buffett owns BYD) want to start selling their EV's here for $25K vs. $60K for Ford & GM.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email