Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Reveal Undervalued Stocks Hiding in Any Market Get Started

White House lawyer snubs Republican request for documents for now

Economy Dec 29, 2022 04:00PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan (R-OH) listens to House Oversight Committee Ranking Member Rep. James Comer (R-KY) during a House Oversight and Government Reform Committee hearing on "The Urgent Need to Address the Gun Violence Epidemic," on Capitol Hill

By Trevor Hunnicutt

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Thursday told Republicans hoping to investigate President Joe Biden that their requests for information for probes, including on the Afghanistan withdrawal, are improper until those lawmakers take over the House next month.

Biden's special counsel, Richard Sauber, told two Republican lawmakers expected to hold top oversight posts in the next Congress that they lack authority now and would need to redo requests for materials they've already sent to the White House once they've taken control of Congress.

Sauber told Representatives James Comer and Jim Jordan in separate letters that their demands "were not made as part of the congressional oversight process" and suggested that they would not be honored yet.

The lawmakers requested documents related to probes into the 2021 U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan; the origins of the COVID-19 pandemic, which started during the previous administration; and the federal government's response to threats against members of local school boards over pandemic-era restrictions and curriculum disputes.

"Should the Committee issue similar or other requests in the 118th Congress, we will review and respond to them in good faith, consistent with the needs and obligations of both branches," Sauber wrote. "We expect the new Congress will undertake its oversight responsibilities in the same spirit of good faith."

Republicans, who take control of the House of Representatives next month, have also prioritized investigating the Democratic president and his son Hunter's business dealings.

Democrats, who retain control of the White House and Senate, are working to aggressively contest those investigations.

Comer, a Kentucky Republican, is expected to chair the House Oversight and Reform Committee. Jordan, an Ohio Republican, is expected to chair the judiciary panel. Both have threatened legal action if they are rebuffed.

In a statement, Comer suggested Biden was falling short on promises to be transparent and vowed to "continue pressing for the answers, transparency, and accountability that the American people deserve." House Judiciary Republicans sent a tweet and called the latest development "ridiculous."

Biden's lawyers and Democratic allies have dismissed the investigations as politically motivated, at odds with voters' priorities and worked to position the probes as extreme.

(This story has been refiled to add dropped word 'and' in paragraph 9)

White House lawyer snubs Republican request for documents for now
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (3)
First Last
First Last Dec 29, 2022 3:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"are improper until those lawmakers take over the House next month ... they lack authority now and would need to redo requests ... once they've taken control of Congress."  --  This seems appropriate.  Just like it was appropriate for Trump NOT to steal classified docs after his term.
Tony Hall
Tony Hall Dec 29, 2022 3:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The president is the one who classifies the documents. I see your still hanging on to the miss information. I guess you still think there was russian collusion even after Hillary and the dnc got caught with their lie.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Dec 29, 2022 3:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
No, the president is not the one who classifies documents. Why is the US right so bound up in ignorance?
Tony Hall
Tony Hall Dec 29, 2022 3:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Brad Albright why do I have to explain basic things to you. The president can declassify whatever he wants.
First Last
First Last Dec 29, 2022 3:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Tony Hall   Even if he did declassify (and there's no evidence he did) those docs, he still stole them.
Stephen Fa
Stephen Fa Dec 29, 2022 2:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
lol, "improper"
First Last
First Last Dec 29, 2022 2:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Yes, it would also be improper for them to vote in Congress until they officially take their seats.
Warren Wesley
Warren Wesley Dec 29, 2022 2:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
...it's coming. dems Delay, Delay, delay....
First Last
First Last Dec 29, 2022 2:45PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Warren Wesley   Let's not do the accusations before the crime
S N
S N Dec 29, 2022 1:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Where’s the outrage? Of course the Reuters type press corps could care less, they left the unbiased journalism train decades ago.
First Last
First Last Dec 29, 2022 1:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Not everyone is as easily triggered as you.
Michael Priory
Mike33301 Dec 29, 2022 1:28PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
outrage over what exactly?
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email