Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Democratic divisions emerge on U.S. Senate's $3.5 trillion spending plan

Published 08/11/2021, 12:05 AM
Updated 08/11/2021, 07:07 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: The exterior of the U.S. Capitol is seen as Senators work to advance the bipartisan infrastructure bill in Washington, U.S., August 8, 2021. REUTERS/Sarah Silbiger/File Photo

By Makini Brice and Susan Cornwell

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Hours after the U.S. Senate approved a $3.5 trillion budget blueprint chock-full of investments in new domestic programs, fissures emerged between the moderate and liberal wings of the Democratic Party over the size and scope of the spending.

Senator Joe Manchin, a moderate Democrat representing the conservative-leaning state of West Virginia, issued a warning shortly after the Senate early on Wednesday passed the budget deal https://www.reuters.com/world/us/paid-leave-clean-energy-preschool-democrats-35-trln-plan-2021-08-09 that would carry out President Joe Biden's top priorities.

Manchin, who often acts as a bridge between his party and Republicans, voiced concerns about potentially "grave consequences" for the nation's debt as well as Washington's ability to respond to other potential crises.

That followed Democratic Senator Kyrsten Sinema's warning that she does not support the $3.5 trillion price tag but would work "in good faith" to develop an alternative to include in implementing legislation.

The plan addresses key Democratic priorities, including climate change and immigration reform, and would create social programs such as universal preschool education and subsidized home healthcare for senior citizens. Progressive (NYSE:PGR) members of the House of Representatives have warned they will not back the bill unless it has enough funding for those goals.

Democrats hold extremely narrow margins in both chambers of Congress, with just one Democratic "no" vote in the Senate or a handful of them in the House enough to doom the bills.

The Senate approved the $3.5 trillion budget plan in a 50-49 vote along party lines, about 14-1/2 hours after passing a $1 trillion infrastructure bill https://www.reuters.com/world/us/whats-us-senates-bipartisan-1-trillion-infrastructure-bill-2021-08-03 in a bipartisan 69-30 vote, proposing to make the nation's biggest investment in decades in roads, bridges, airports and waterways.

Democrats plan to pass the larger package within the next few months, using the "budget reconciliation https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senates-reconciliation-process-its-not-way-it-sounds-2021-08-10 process," which allows them to pass legislation with a simple majority vote.

Democratic Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer said he believed his party would stick together on the package.

"Look, there are some in my caucus who might believe it's too much; there are some of my caucus who believe it's too little," Schumer said when asked about the concerns by Manchin and Sinema about the $3.5 trillion price tag.

"And I can tell you this: In reconciliation, one, we are going to all come together to get something done. And two, it will have every part of the Biden plan in a big, bold, robust way," Schumer said.

House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer, a Democrat, said the House would suspend a summer break on Aug. 23 to consider the budget resolution.

Manchin and Sinema voted for both measures.

But this fall, when negotiations go into full swing on the implementing legislation, the two legislators likely will roil the waters if they and moderate House Democrats try to shrink spending.

TWIN-TRACK TROUBLE?

The trouble has been brewing for months. In a May 17 letter to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Schumer, a group of 59 House Democrats referred to new investments in the range of $7 trillion to $9.5 trillion.

For its part, a bipartisan group of House moderates is demanding that Pelosi promptly hold a vote on the $1 trillion infrastructure bill.

Democratic Representative Stephanie Murphy, a member of the "Problem Solvers Caucus," urged her to schedule it for this month.

"While I support passing a targeted reconciliation bill to help FL (Florida) families, we shouldn’t hold infrastructure hostage to it," she tweeted.

That is at odds with Pelosi and progressives, who demand that the $1 trillion infrastructure legislation and the $3.5 trillion in additional spending move in tandem to ensure that both get through.

Representative Pramila Jayapal, the Congressional Progressive Caucus chair, warned in a tweet on Tuesday: "Progressives have made it clear from the get go: We're not voting for the smaller infrastructure bill in the House until the larger jobs and families package also passes the Senate."

Republicans have railed against the $3.5 trillion spending plan. Senate Republican leader Mitch McConnell, who voted for the $1 trillion infrastructure bill, called the larger proposal "radical."

DEBT CEILING LOOMS

Dozens of Republican senators also signed a pledge not to vote to raise the nation's borrowing capability when it is exhausted in the autumn to try to curtail Democrats' spending plans.

"They (Democrats) shouldn't be expecting Republicans to raise the debt ceiling to accommodate their deficit spending," Senator Ron Johnson, a Republican who circulated the pledge, told the Wall Street Journal.

Biden expressed confidence the matter would be resolved. "They're (Republicans) not going to let us default," he told reporters.

During a conference call with House Democrats, Pelosi rebutted Republicans, saying the debt limit increase would cover past spending.

"This is Trump’s money (spent)," Pelosi said, according to a source familiar with the conversation. "This is paying for his tax scam, this is paying for COVID, a responsibility we all share."

© Reuters. U.S. President Joe Biden meets virtually with governors, mayors, and other state and local elected officials to discuss the bipartisan Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act, in the South Court Auditorium at the White House in Washington, U.S., August 11, 2021. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

U.S. borrowing swelled by almost 40% to nearly $28 trillion under Republican former President Donald Trump, fueled by the passage of tax cuts in 2017 and coronavirus-related spending in 2020.

Failure to increase or suspend the statutory debt limit - now at $28.5 trillion - could trigger a federal government shutdown or a debt default.

Latest comments

im not an american or live smewhere in us,but i smell smething fishy about those budget haha.
democrats have only 1 thing in mind and that's to tax americans
A Waste
McConnell should step aside and let a real repub lead us. McConnell is as senile as ole creepy Joe...
stay with CNN you'll be happy
We all are, it’s full of pork and useless other things.
Remember Solyndra? I see a similar pattern of well-connected DC insiders capturing most of the fund which will go to waste
Or evergreen solar, a123 battery, or fisker cars company, should i continue?
stop spending on army snd usa will be just fine with ecology,fighting poverty, infrastucture, free school and university....No good 🤔🥴
LOL
what would support the usd?
it's mean that's government want all stimulus money back from borrower'. big crash soon
money will be pocketed and projects will be abandoned.
you have no clue me comment.. the deficits will destroy the economy.. for the people is laughable..
u r that naive to beleive in everything politicians say. U r hopeless.
u r partially right. If deficit hits 200% gdp, # hit the fan.
Keep increasing the ceiling... to infinity and beyond 🤣
Republicans have short memories as they did similar legislation by passing massive tax cut for the rich and corporations that added $3.8 trillion to the nations debt and suspended the debt ceiling to allow it. The infrastructure bills will have little impact on the debt as most will be paid for by tax increases on incomes over $400,000 and corporations. Again uneducated trump supporters making claims with no facts to support it.
spending adds to national debt, not tax cuts. The cart does not lead the horse dummy
deciding to cut my own pay while spending the same on food and housing means my debt goes up. hence they made the debt go up
It's the beginning of the end of this once great nation. US debt will be 32 trillion. Just for perspective, the total money in the world today is 80 trillion And some wonder why bitcoin is where it is...people aren't stu_pid, they know this debt is unpayable.
GOP must not raise the ceiling in retaliation of this abusive trillions of waste.
people who dont undersrand tax law dont understand what trump did. I own businesses and it far helped us stay afloat then someone haining billions. People just repeat what they heard on the tv
It works both ways Andrew.  Reduce revenues and keep spending level - then more debt is required to maintain.
Most of my small business clients did not see any meaningful reduction of their tax burden as a result of the TCJA.unless it was through bonus depreciation.  Those that benefit the most were individuals receiving K-'1's from real estate related pass though entities.
Good luck hiring 100,000 police. They make more on welfare than they would by sitting in their car doing nothing.
I am sure there are plenty of individuals who want to dominate, humiliate, and hurt others while simultaneously being given awards for doing so.
So sad. Entrenched in socialism. Can i take my vote back from Romney who is now my neighbor???
Budiness owners and their ideas created the wealth.
it’s not, but roads are s very small part if this.
 Then let's put a wealth tax into place.  Seems to me that those with the most to lose can pay most of the cost of a military needed to protect their assets.
"Dozens of Republican senators also signed a pledge not to vote to raise the nation's borrowing capability when it is exhausted in the autumn"  -- PR stunt, empty threats since we all know they won't risk another govt shutdown
maybe, but I have a feeling most of their constituents would rather see the government burn to the ground than let the larger package pass. It isn't just reckless spending to them. It is a threat to their beliefs and way of life
your lack of knowledge on the subject is incredible. this is not socialism. not even close. passing a bill that raises taxes for some to rebuild the countries infrastructure is basic government financing, not socialism. socialism would be of the government seized apple and said all of apples profits would be for the us people.
They're commenting on the bogus 3.5 trillion dollar stimulus, not the 1 trillion infrastructure deal. All wasteful spending. let local governments tax, toll, do what they must to maintain themselves.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.