Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
New! 💥 Get ProPicks to see the strategy that has beaten the S&P 500 by 829%+ Claim 60% Off

US House panel approves four funding bills; government shutdown deadline approaches

Published Sep 23, 2023 02:27PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. The U.S. Capitol dome is seen in a reflection outside the United States Capitol building in Washington, U.S., September 22, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. House of Representatives' Rules Committee on Saturday voted, 9-2, to tee up four appropriations bills for debate on the full House floor, the latest move in Republicans' last-ditch bid to prevent government shutdowns after a Sept. 30 deadline.

The committee's action, on a rare Saturday session, sets rules for debating the four bills covering fiscal 2024 funding for the departments of Defense, Agriculture, State and Homeland Security.

It was unclear whether enough Republicans will vote on the House floor for the rules, which must be established before the House can proceed to the funding bills themselves.

Infighting between far right and moderate House Republicans has so far stymied attempts to advance most legislation that would keep the government running when the new fiscal year starts on Oct. 1. Their party holds a narrow 221-212 majority in the House and can afford very few defections.

A short-term spending bill, known as a continuing resolution, will almost certainly be needed to avert many federal agencies from suspending operations when existing monies expire in a week. A group of far-right Republicans has fought against this, seeing it as endorsing government spending they consider too high.

"To talk about a CR (continuing resolution) is too premature," Republican Representative Andy Ogles told reporters outside a House Rules Committee meeting on Friday ahead of the vote. "We have a task at hand which is to pass 12 appropriations bills and that's what we need to focus on."

Instead, House Republicans have prepared the four separate, full-year spending bills that are certain to be rejected by the Democratic-controlled Senate. So far, the House has passed only one of 12 appropriations bills for the fiscal year, which the Senate has not planned to take up.

"The goal is to try to move as many (bills) as possible to show the good faith effort on both sides" of the Republican caucus, Representative Marc Molinaro, a moderate freshman Republican, told reporters on Friday.

House Speaker Kevin McCarthy has said the House may begin advancing the four bills on Tuesday as he seeks leverage in negotiations with the Senate. He is hoping the bills will give him enough room to advance a short-term spending bill to keep the government running through Oct. 31, though a handful of Republicans have said they oppose a short-term funding bill.

The vote by the Rules Committee comes two days after five Republicans joined with Democrats to block a procedural vote on the defense spending bill. It was the third time the party had failed to advance that legislation, which has broad support from Republicans.

If Congress cannot agree on a spending plan, government activities will be shuttered or limited.

Former President Donald Trump, the leading candidate for the Republican nomination for the 2024 presidential election, has publicly supported a shutdown. During Trump's four-year presidency, the government closed three times.

A shutdown is not completely inevitable. Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, scheduled a procedural vote for Tuesday evening to begin advancing a stopgap funding bill.

If that passes, McCarthy would decide on bringing it up for a vote in the House, risking the wrath of his conservative flank. That could potentially spark a move to remove McCarthy from his speakership, leading to further chaos in the House.

US House panel approves four funding bills; government shutdown deadline approaches
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (5)
Otis Grant
Otis Grant Sep 24, 2023 9:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Where were these far right Republicans when traitor trump added 8 trillion to the deficit and cut taxes on the rich, costing us even more?
Michael Benson
Michael Benson Sep 23, 2023 7:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Stocks remain a popular investment choice.
Michael Benson
Michael Benson Sep 23, 2023 7:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The yield curve is closely monitored by investors.
OldAndWise
OldAndWise Sep 23, 2023 3:06PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
The fifth bill should be about Uphold Disrespect. I would like measure the voting amount of unconstitutional anarchy. And just like for George Santos let it be publicized.
Warm Camp
Warm Camp Sep 23, 2023 2:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Interesting to see that all Dems vote together with “far-right” Reps. Of course, this simple and clear fact is not highlighted in this propaganda piece from Reuters.
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Sep 23, 2023 2:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You are confused, or failed to read. The far right voted with the Dems position: "five Republicans joined with Democrats." But don't let the facts interfere with you paranoid misunderstandings.
Jason Patcher
Jason Patcher Sep 23, 2023 2:55PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
maybe not reading comprehension but confirmation bias. It's really sad - like 1 in 3 never achieve critical thinking.
Phil Ht
Phil Ht Sep 23, 2023 2:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Close it up. Better off without these lunatics
Moussa Bamba
Moussa Bamba Sep 23, 2023 2:49PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email