Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. and China have significant differences ahead of trade talks Friday night

Published 11/15/2019, 06:45 PM
Updated 11/15/2019, 06:45 PM
© Reuters. U.S. Secretary of Commerce Wilbur Ross attends the 25th anniversary of the establishment of the American Chamber of Commerce in Vietnam, at a hotel in Hanoi

By David Lawder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Top U.S. and Chinese negotiators are seeking to narrow differences on an initial trade agreement during a Friday evening phone call, but remain split on key issues.

President Donald Trump had not yet agreed to remove any tariffs as part of a deal, and the size of China's commitment to purchase U.S. farm products was not yet clear, Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross said on Friday in an interview on Fox Business Network.

U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer and Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin were expected to participate in the phone call with Chinese Vice Premier Liu He which will be held on Friday evening Washington time.

China's reluctance to commit to a specific amount of farm purchases remains a sticking point in the talks, as is U.S. reluctance to roll back tariffs, people briefed on the negotiations said. The world's largest economies have been involved in a tit-for-tat trade war that is dragging on global growth.

Trump in October said China's Liu had agreed to more than double China's purchases of farm goods to $40 billion to $50 billion annually, but Beijing wants to make purchases based on market needs.

Beijing is insisting that tariffs need to be rolled back as part of any "phase one" deal, but Trump has not agreed to do that.

Ross said it was important to specify a firm commitment, adding that China "can certainly afford to buy $40 billion to $50 billion" in U.S. agricultural products.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"The question is, are they willing to commit to it? And if they are willing to commit, are there any escape hatches to the commitment?" he said.

Ross added it was unclear whether the initial agreement would be finalized after a potential deadline this month evaporated with the cancellation of an international summit in Chile and another round of U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports looming on Dec. 15.

He said there was plenty of time to continue negotiations before the December deadline, but repeated that Trump was happy to proceed with the tariffs if a deal could not be reached.

Ross also said there was a "very high probability" that the United States would reach a final agreement on a phase one trade deal with China.

"The devil is always in the details. And we’re down to the last details now," Ross said.

Ross' positive comments echoed those of White House economic adviser Larry Kudlow, who said the two sides were "getting close" to a deal.

The positive comments fueled a rebound in trade optimism on Wall Street, sending the main U.S. stock indexes to record levels. The benchmark S&P 500 (SPX) tallied its sixth straight week of gains while the Dow Jones Industrial Average (DJI) breached 28,000 for the first time.

Latest comments

why deal? US can continue print money to buy its own agricultural products and increase debt, and China can continue production with still relatively cheap labor and consume domestically. isn't this scenario great?
I feel like China wants to hold these "talks" going on until they get a clearer picture of whose most likely to win the elections next year. Why else are we having pointkess Phase 1 and all these contradictions going?? If both countries really wanted to negotiate then we would be close by now...
pointless*
This trade war could turn out to be Trumps monumental f'up.
100% sure no China trade deal will take place while Trump is in office, Trump himself won't let it happen because China will never agree to everything Trump demands, negotiated agreemejts mean compromise and Trumps ego won't let him compromise it always has to be his way. Therefore no agreement.
I told you guys ... the difference here is that China has the upperhand. China's Quarterback can plan for decades out, but Trump doesn't have the luxury to do that. Trump is looking yo make the playoff, but Quarterback Xi is locked in as QB1 for a decade out.
very true, china wants to abuse the US, and democrats want the US to be abused, but Trump is standing his ground
So you like Kudlow & Trump manipulating our market with lower interest rates & more debt. Punish Americans that are financially responsible. Encourage debt to everyone around! It’s a sad day when everyone is in debt.
you have to be snorting too much CNN if you think Trump controls the fed, he bashes them incessantly for their actions lol. and to clarify, yes i 100% think that the democrats economic policies would destroy the US economy. the current candidates are socialists.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.