Get 40% Off
👀 👁 🧿 All eyes on Biogen, up +4,56% after posting earnings. Our AI picked it in March 2024.
Which stocks will surge next?
Unlock AI-picked Stocks

Still hope for U.S.-China deal this year: U.S. official

Published 11/23/2019, 05:49 PM
Updated 11/23/2019, 05:49 PM
© Reuters. ASEAN-United States Summit in Bangkok

By Steve Scherer

HALIFAX, Nova Scotia (Reuters) - United States national security adviser Robert O'Brien said on Saturday that an initial trade agreement with China is still possible by the end of the year, but warned Washington would not turn a blind eye to what happens in Hong Kong.

The comments add to growing worries that a Chinese crackdown on anti-government protests in Hong Kong could further complicate the efforts by the United States and China to end a prolonged trade war that has roiled global markets and undercut global economic growth forecasts.

"We were hoping to have (a phase one) deal done by the end of the year. I still think that's possible," O'Brien told reporters at a security conference in Halifax.

"At the same time, we're not going to turn a blind eye to what's happening in Hong Kong or what's happening in the South China Sea, or other areas of the world where we're concerned about China's activity," he said.

He said that he hoped district elections in Hong Kong would proceed without violence. "That would be a good sign," he said.

President Donald Trump on Friday said he had told Chinese President Xi Jinping that crushing the Hong Kong protesters would have "a tremendous negative impact" on efforts to reach an accord to end a 16-month trade war.

He has been vague about whether he would sign or veto U.S. legislation to back protesters in Hong Kong, and boasted that he alone had prevented Beijing from crushing the demonstrations with a million soldiers.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

O'Brien said he had not spoken to Trump on Saturday about his decision on whether to sign the Hong Kong human rights bill and did not know what he would do, but noted that the president had until early December to decide. The legislation will automatically become law on Dec. 3 if Trump opts to do nothing.

"I think the bill passed with a pretty significant majority, so I'm sure that's something the president is taking into consideration," O'Brien said.

Asked what would be the reaction of the United States if China cracked down hard on the protests, O'Brien said on Saturday: "I'm hoping that doesn't happen. We've already seen too much violence in Hong Kong."

"The real question is what is the world prepared to do about China if there is that sort of a crackdown? The United States will do its part," he said.

U.S. Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin had said in October that U.S. and Chinese trade negotiators were working on nailing down a "phase one" trade deal text for their presidents to sign in November.

But the deal's completion could slide into next year, trade experts and people close to the White House said this week, as Beijing presses for more extensive tariff rollbacks, and Washington counters with heightened demands of its own.

Latest comments

riiiiiiiiiiiiiiight..... . . why in the heck would there be a trade deal? the US stock market is at all time highs, trump has no need to make any such deal at this time. China the only one hurting here and has not shown any signs of coming up with a deal, just whining about the US wishing there was a corrupt globalists in office
I need to correct ya'll ... these are not called Protestors. They are strictly called Rioters.
By communists maybe. Protesters in the free world
You must meant free world like the Fake News media. Even Trump understand those are Rioters. Trump sided with President Xi Jing Ping.
if the US lawmakers really have good intentions and no malicious intentions. why are they provoking the protesters by protecting their rights but then allowing them to destroy hong kong and the people living there. shouldnt they protect everyone instead of protesters that destroy livelihoods. thats just wrong.
Protesters are protesting for freedom from dictatatorships they want democracy not communism. Sometimes things get destroyed in these situations thats understandable
by destroying public infrastructure and throwing molotov?
i wonder why no US lawmaker is reacting negatively about the petrol bombs and destroying of mtr and other public utilities. does that mean its ok for protesters to be violent and destroy things. while its not ok for the government to stop the violence?
Petrol bombs are a reaction to tear tgas and violence against them
Try that in US and see what will happen to the 'Peaceful protesters'?
These guys keep repeating the same headlines again abd again everyday so that Algos can pick up and pump the market up!
Theres still a chance hehe
In a democracy country, people will is met by govt. in a communist country, people will is met by bullets and “reeducation” camps.
Trump will do nothing.
So you mean theres still a chance.
Fantasy Island.  The plane boss the plane.
Lets face facts if rioters like we saw in HK were running riot in New York people would have been shot dead with real bullets.
Yeah, this is absolutely 100% a true statement.
So what's your point? There is a reason we see these demonstrations, and riots, in Hong Kong and not in US and Europe.
Nobody got shot during phili riots. the local govnt meet the rioters demand. The yellow vest protestors got their demand. Stop living under the rocks.
The louder china will get the less effective this goosing from usa will be
They are so afraid of a market drop its unbelievable.
There's Incredibly huge bubble and no one has any idea, and market is last defending line, once it collapse it will be hundred times worse than great depression.
new talking head to pump the market on the China trade deal
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.