

Please try another search
By Susan Cornwell
WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The lead U.S. Republican negotiator on an infrastructure plan said on Sunday he hoped for a detailed agreement sometime this week despite a dispute over spending on mass transit, but a Democratic source said several other issues were also unresolved.
Lawmakers are hoping to hold a procedural vote in the Senate as soon as Monday on whether to start debate on the bipartisan plan, and negotiators are trying to nail down final details. Issues that have strained the agreement include a provision intended to lift workers' wages https://reut.rs/3rALYal.
A bipartisan framework brokered with President Joe Biden and announced over a month ago provides for $1.2 trillion in funding over five years, including about $579 billion in new spending on roads, bridges, ports and other public works projects. Lawmakers and the White House have been trying to fill in the gaps.
"We're about 90% of the way there," Senator Rob Portman, a Republican, told ABC's "This Week" on Sunday. "I feel good about getting that done this week," Portman said, adding that talks were continuing Sunday and the one issue outstanding was mass transit.
But a Democratic source close to the talks said a number of major issues were unresolved.
In addition to higher wages and public transit, the two sides are apart on ensuring safe drinking water, expanding broadband internet, repairing highways and bridges and using unspent COVID-19 relief money to pay for the program, the source said.
Nonetheless, Senator Mark Warner, a Democrat and member of the bipartisan group of 22 senators working on the plan, was optimistic they could produce something in writing by Monday.
"We’ll have that text. It will be out there tomorrow," Warner told "Fox News Sunday."
Democrat Biden has said the bipartisan plan is essential, but he also wants it to be followed by a much larger $3.5 trillion budget framework that would allow for spending on some of his other priorities, including climate measures and social spending.
Republicans say they will not back the larger plan. But House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, a Democrat, says she will not hold a House vote on the bipartisan bill until the Senate also does the larger plan, an attitude that Portman attacked on Sunday.
"What she has just said is entirely counter to what President Biden has committed to and what the Senate is doing, which is a two-track process," Portman told ABC.
Asked whether Congress could end up with nothing passing, Portman said: "If she has her way we could."
Portman, without giving numbers, said Republicans had increased their own proposal for spending on public transit in the bipartisan plan. "We're not getting much response from the Democrats on it," he added. "My hope is that we'll see progress on that yet today."
Senate Republicans blocked a procedural vote https://reut.rs/372hcOe to open debate on the measure last week, saying they wanted to see a text of the measure first, although both parties have used "shell" or incomplete bills in the past to get floor action moving.
Berlin (Reuters) - Germany's 2022 inflation rate will more than double from last year's 3.1% as already high energy and food prices are pushed up by the war in Ukraine, the...
By Andy Bruce LONDON (Reuters) -Momentum in Britain's private sector slowed much more than expected this month, adding to recession worries as inflation pressures ratcheted...
By Gayatri Suroyo and Fransiska Nangoy JAKARTA (Reuters) - Indonesia's central bank announced on Tuesday more aggressive hikes in the reserve requirement ratio (RRR) for banks,...
Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?
By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.
%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List
Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.
I feel that this comment is:
Thank You!
Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Add a Comment
We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:
Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.
Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.
Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.