Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Fed divided on policy, discount rate votes show

Published 08/27/2019, 04:18 PM
Updated 08/27/2019, 04:18 PM
Fed divided on policy, discount rate votes show

By Ann Saphir

(Reuters) - U.S. central bankers may have been more deeply divided than previously understood over the decision last month to cut interest rates for the first time in more than a decade, records from meetings held across the Fed's 12 regional Fed banks suggest.

The Fed cut its benchmark policy rate a quarter of a point to a range of 2%-2.25% on July 31. Most directors at regional Fed banks saw heightened trade tensions and uncertainty as risks to the economic outlook, summaries of their discussions released on Tuesday showed, similar to policymakers who voted on the rate cut.

But those at half of the Federal Reserve's 12 regional Fed banks still wanted to keep the emergency lending rate for commercial banks unchanged in votes taken as late as just one week before the Fed's July 30-31 policysetting meeting, the minutes showed.

Directors supporting no rate change cited "a strong labor market and inflation near" the Fed's 2% goal, the minutes showed.

Recommendations from regional Fed bank directors on the so-called discount rate are not policy votes themselves, but at most Fed banks the votes of the directors -- who represent not only banks but also foundations, community groups, and businesses -- reflect the views of their presidents.

Minutes from the Fed's policymaking meeting itself, released last week, also revealed divisions among rate-setters, including "several" who wanted no change in rates.

The vote from the New York Fed may not have indicated opposition to a rate cut, since directors there have in recent years made it a practice to weigh in after the Fed's policy-setting panel changes rates.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

New York Fed President John Williams (NYSE:WMB), a close confidante of Fed Chair Jerome Powell, voted on July 31 with the majority at the Fed to reduce the policy rate.

MINNEAPOLIS WANTED HALF-POINT CUT

Directors at the other six Fed banks recommended a decrease to the so-called discount rate, "in light of risks to the economic outlook and muted inflation pressures," the minutes showed.

Most of the half of Fed bank directors who supported a rate cut wanted the quarter-point reduction that Fed policymakers ultimately decided on at their July 30-31 policy-setting meeting.

Minneapolis Fed directors wanted to go further, recommending a half-point cut to the rate. That's exactly what Minneapolis Fed President Neel Kashkari has publicly called for.

Similarly Cleveland Fed Bank President Loretta Mester, whose directors joined those of New York, Boston, Atlanta, Richmond and Kansas City in wanting the discount rate to be left at its then-current 3%, said earlier this month that she opposed the Fed's July rate cut.

Boston Fed President Eric Rosengren and Kansas City Fed President Esther George dissented against the Fed's July 31 decision to cut rates.

Latest comments

China is very happy
But not hong kong... they are not very happy
Dictator Donald will not be happy!
Trump is the BOSS ... YEA bro.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.