Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Fed's Brainard vows to battle inflation, deflects Republican climate criticism

EconomyJan 13, 2022 04:17PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Federal Reserve Board building on Constitution Avenue is pictured in Washington, U.S., March 19, 2019. REUTERS/Leah Millis/File Photo

By Howard Schneider and Ann Saphir

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Federal Reserve Governor Lael Brainard, in a hearing for her nomination to become the U.S. central bank's vice chair, pledged on Thursday to help bring inflation under control and deflected Republican senators' concerns that she would use the position to sway national climate change policies.

In a hint that her nomination may be a proxy for a larger partisan debate about the Fed's direction, Brainard was quizzed by Republican Senator Pat Toomey on whether her support for more climate research and analysis at the central bank was "a precursor to direct capital away from" carbon-intensive industries.

"I have not suggested we do stress tests for climate," Brainard responded. "We would not tell banks which sectors to lend to or not lend to. But we do want to make sure they are measuring, monitoring, their material risks."

Brainard's comments on climate were similar to those delivered by Fed Chair Jerome Powell at his own nomination hearing before the Senate Banking Committee on Tuesday. But the questioning by Toomey and other Republicans reflected deeper concern that upcoming Biden administration appointments may steer the Fed in a more aggressive direction that makes credit more expensive for legacy oil and gas companies or carbon resource exploration.

Only four of the Fed board's seven seats are filled right now, and eventual Biden appointments could advance what he and his supporters feel should be a bigger Fed role on climate issues and a tougher hand with Wall Street.

White House spokesperson Jen Psaki has repeatedly promised that news on the next Fed nominations would come "soon," but it remains unclear when exactly the announcements will be made.

Biden, a Democrat, is considering nominating former Fed Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin as the central bank's vice chair for supervision and regulation, for example, and Toomey noted her opposition, outlined in a 2020 New York Times article, to oil and gas firms' participation in the Fed's pandemic-related rescue lending.

"I have not studied her positions," Brainard said. "I can speak to what we do in our supervisory guidance. It is pretty meat and potatoes." As Republicans, several from oil and gas producing states, extended the line of questioning, Brainard insisted near the end of the hearing "we don't do environmental policy at the Federal Reserve."


On monetary policy, Brainard stuck to what is now a unanimous Fed consensus that interest rates will need to move higher this year, a move she said could be made "as soon as" the Fed halts a separate asset purchase program in March.

Lawmakers from both parties are concerned about the fast pace of price increases, and a number of Fed officials have pointed to March as the possible time for "liftoff" from the near-zero policy interest rate in place since the start of the pandemic in March of 2020.

In her opening remarks to the Senate panel, Brainard said that controlling inflation that has spiked to nearly a 40-year high is the "most important task" facing the Fed right now - comments that echoed those of Powell earlier in the week.

But unlike the session with Powell, which included statements of support from Democrats and Republicans, no Republican senators pledged to vote for Brainard, a Democrat who was first appointed to the Fed in 2014 by then-President Barack Obama.

She was confirmed at that time by a 61-31 Senate vote. To become vice chair she would need confirmation by a majority of the Senate. While Democrats exercise narrow control over the chamber, some of Biden's top priorities have been stalled by Democratic opposition, perhaps most notably from Senator Joe Manchin of West Virginia, a coal producing state where climate change policies are also controversial.

Brainard could remain a Fed governor regardless of whether she becomes vice chair.

As a governor she has been a frequent dissenting vote against steps taken during former President Donald Trump's administration and under Powell to loosen oversight of the largest banks; called for the Fed to require financial firms to set aside more capital; and worried that Fed officials were behind European central bankers in understanding how climate change might effect the macroeconomy and financial system.

As Republicans tried to paint her as a potential partisan, Brainard, a PhD economist and veteran Washington policymaker, said she would hew to the traditional role of vice chair as someone who "supports the chair and achieves consensus" particularly over monetary policy.

In contrast to the Republican questioning, the Democratic chairman of the committee, Senator Sherrod Brown, opened the hearing with a glowing endorsement, calling Brainard a "steady hand" helping lead the Fed during the coronavirus pandemic, and "someone who understands that workers, not corporations, not Wall Street," were at the heart of the U.S. economy.

Fed's Brainard vows to battle inflation, deflects Republican climate criticism

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (4)
Samantha Sa
Samantha Sa Jan 13, 2022 4:14PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Speaking from a nonpartisan view, stress tests as related to the environment are intended for preparedness in the event of cataclysmic weather. As an example, a wide spread earthquake, tornado, or tsunami severe enough to impact several states within a short period of time. This is not the same as indoctrinating environmental policies although some feel the fed should implement so-called green policies that would restrict financing fossil fuel. My view is that replacement of fossil fuel with dependence on rare earth minerals is a mostly unrecognized detriment to the environment and agriculture. Real environmentalists, mostly shut out of the debate, are about conservation and the technology that is available now and can be further developed for safer excavation and reduced emissions.
Alan Rice
Alan Rice Jan 13, 2022 1:09PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Yeah. The problem with Lael is she is too concerned with the future lack of workable Biosphere. (Very Un- american!!)
Connecticut Yankee
A_Jaundiced_Eye Jan 13, 2022 11:56AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
She's telling them whatever they want to hear.
Oldfashioned Owl
Oldfashioned Owl Jan 13, 2022 6:42AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
These are the reasons for growing unrest & dissatisfaction among the Americans. Totally inert. Even the most inert metals have some reaction under some circumstances but not them.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email