Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Biden's Fed nominees draw fire from a Republican senator

EconomyJan 25, 2022 06:40PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Ranking member Sen. Pat Toomey (R-PA) questions Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell during a Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee hearing on the CARES Act, at the Hart Senate Office Buildin

By Ann Saphir

(Reuters) - Signaling U.S. President Joe Biden's picks for the Federal Reserve may face a tough confirmation process in the closely divided Senate, Republican Senator Pat Toomey on Tuesday raised questions over whether they fairly represent the nation.

"I write to express my concerns with the significant lack of diversity in geography and professional experience in your recent slate of nominees to serve on the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System," Toomey, the top Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, told Biden in a letter made public by Toomey's office.

Biden late last year renominated Fed Chair Jerome Powell and picked current Governor Lael Brainard to be Fed vice chair. Earlier this month he nominated former Federal Reserve Governor Sarah Bloom Raskin to be the central bank's vice chair for supervision, and two Black economists, Lisa Cook and Philip Jefferson to the Board.

Those choices would make the seven-member Fed Board the most diverse, by race and gender, it has ever been.

But by profession and region, Toomey said Tuesday: not so much.

All but one, Michigan State University's Cook, are from the Richmond Fed district, Toomey said in the letter. There are 12 Fed districts covering the country. And most, he said, are from academia.

Toomey reserved his sharpest comments for Raskin, saying she has "demonstrated hostility" toward the oil and gas sector, making her "unacceptable."

The banking committee must approve Fed nominees before they are considered by the full Senate, and held confirmation hearings for Powell and Brainard earlier this month.

Toomey said at the time he planned to support Powell's renomination, but his and other Republicans' questioning of Brainard suggests an uphill battle for other nominees.

Toomey released the letter as Powell convened the first Fed policy setting meeting of the year, during which it is expected to begin to chart a path toward higher interest rates and a smaller balance sheet after two years of super-easy monetary policy to fight the pandemic recession.


Senators have historically accepted a wide range of interpretations of the Federal Reserve Act's requirement that no more than one Fed governor shall be "selected from any one Federal Reserve district," says Fed historian Kaleb Nygaard, a sernior research associate at Yale's Financial Stability Program.

Some have had to reach back to birth or early childhood to establish a connection with a Fed district not already "taken" by a sitting governor. In 2011, Senator Richard Shelby, helped sink one Fed nominee, Nobel Prize laureate Peter Diamond, in part on the basis of his place of residence.

"It's completely appropriate for the Senate to ask and the White House to have to defend their picks based on geography," Nygaard said, referring to the governing law.

Senate Banking panel chair Sherrod Brown expects to hold confirmation hearings for the Board seats next month.

Biden's Fed nominees draw fire from a Republican senator

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
peter neal
peter neal Jan 25, 2022 4:29PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Qualification and experience mean nothing. It color and gender or in Biden case total lack of cognitive function.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email