Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Free Webinar - What Is a Gold IRA? Fees, Advantages, and Risks - December 7, 2022 | 01:00PM EST Enroll Now

Column-Has COVID finally killed inflation targeting? :Mike Dolan

Economy Feb 09, 2022 04:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. A Euro sign is seen on the facade of the European Central Bank (ECB) headquarters in Frankfurt, Germany, December 30, 2021. REUTERS/Wolfgang Rattay
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio

By Mike Dolan

LONDON (Reuters) - The seismic supply shocks and wild price distortions of the pandemic could finally call time on 30 years of strict inflation targeting by the world's big central banks.

Faced with headline and core inflation rates surging far above 2% target rates and at their highest in decades, central banks have scrambled to lift interest rates from historic lows or flag rate hikes ahead - even though they insist inflation will be close to or even below those targets within two years.

U.S. Federal Reserve policymakers see their favoured measure - core annual gains in the personal consumption expenditures price index - back at 2.1% in 2024 even though it was more than twice that last year its highest in more than three decades.

The European Central Bank sees euro zone inflation more than halving to 1.8% next year while the Bank of England sees UK inflation peaking at 7.25% this year before tumbling far below target within three years.

Yet the hawks are out in force to show government and the public alike that they have things in hand.

Perhaps these forecasts simply assume "normalisation" of monetary policy in the short term and a return to pre-pandemic settings as supply skews in energy and labour markets ease back.

But the problem reopens the debate about whether strict inflation targeting - only in vogue since the 1990s - should continue to guide monetary policy and what should replace it.

Many think the rising sovereign and household indebtedness means any flirtation with deflation - that effectively lifts the inflation-adjusted costs of accumulated borrowings over time and threatens prolonged depression - is simply unacceptable to most governments and economists.

And if so, the long-established 2% norm may just be too close or too risky for comfort. Most Western economies have dallied with either deflation or sub-target inflation since the banking crash of 2008 - hence the rollout of extraordinary loose monetary policies from bond buying to negative rates and all the other distortions that that brings in asset prices elsewhere.

While it may feel like the opposite problem today, it spotlights the flaw in point targeting inflation.

If no one wants to brutalise economic activity now by dealing with the sudden inflation overshoots caused by pandemic supply jolts - also fearing potentially lingering price pressures in its wake - then maybe the solution would be to up those targets and "de-emphasise" them in favour of greater discretion.

US core inflation and Fed target -

G7 inflation expectations -


Hedge fund manager Stephen Jen of Eurizon SLJ thinks that sort of pressure may well now build as the Fed acts hawkish but stays "behind the actual inflation curve" as the extent of supply distortions are assessed and many unwind.

"My sense is that most economists may still prefer high inflation to low inflation," Jen said. "The debate of whether central banks should adopt a higher inflation target of, say 3%, has not even started in earnest - but it will."

Financial markets doubt central banks will succeed in returning U.S. inflation to 2% targets any time soon - but inflation expectations in bond markets are 2.7% and 2.4% respectively over five- and 10-year horizons.

Of course the Fed already bought itself a lot of wriggle room with its recent move away from a point inflation target in favour of aiming for a rather vague 2% average over time. And its mandate explicitly includes full employment as well as stable prices, balancing any tendency to stamp on inflation to the detriment of jobs.

While ECB lent in that direction too, neither it nor the other central banks have moved as far and their remits remain far stricter on meeting the explicit price goals.

Fears of an overreaction to missing the point target on the upside today in part mirrors the problem that largely sounded the beginning of the end for inflation targeting 15 years ago.

Many accused central banks of the early 2000s of blowing the credit bubble that bust spectacularly in 2008 with overly loose monetary policy simply because headline inflation rates were well behaved are 2% targets and other metrics were ignored.

In retrospect, inflation targeting was still new at the time - only a decade or so old and having replaced a range of post-World War Two monetary goals from the gold standard and fixed exchange rates to ranges for money supply growth.

All these had failed too and were similarly prone to either supply shocks or speculation.

The one untried alternative that's been proposed for years is that central banks instead target nominal gross domestic product growth.

Advocates say it allows central banks a measurable goal they can affect rather than over or under-reacting to supply shocks they have no control over - crucially avoiding assumptions about economic slack and potential that are impossible to read in real time.

Former Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) chief economist and UK Treasury minister Jim O'Neill says he's become a convert to the Nominal GDP target idea.

"Single point inflation targeting is way past its sell date," he said.

The author is editor-at-large for finance and markets at Reuters News. Any views expressed here are his own

(by Mike Dolan, Twitter (NYSE:TWTR): @reutersMikeD; editing by David Evans)

Column-Has COVID finally killed inflation targeting? :Mike Dolan

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email