Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Three-child policy: China lifts cap on births in major policy shift

Published 05/31/2021, 03:19 AM
Updated 05/31/2021, 12:10 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Children play at a waterfront in Shekou area of Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China March 15, 2021. REUTERS/David Kirton

By Tony Munroe and David Stanway

BEIJING (Reuters) -Married Chinese couples may have up to three children, China announced on Monday, in a major shift from the existing limit of two after recent data showed a dramatic decline in births in the world's most populous country.

Beijing scrapped its decades-old one-child policy in 2016, replacing it with a two-child limit to try and stave off risks to its economy from a rapidly aging population. But that failed to result in a sustained surge in births given the high cost of raising children in Chinese cities, a challenge that persists to this day.

The policy change will come with "supportive measures, which will be conducive to improving our country's population structure, fulfilling the country's strategy of actively coping with an ageing population", the official Xinhua news agency said following a politburo meeting chaired by President Xi Jinping.

Among those measures, China will lower educational costs for families, step up tax and housing support, guarantee the legal interests of working women and clamp down on "sky-high" dowries, it said, without giving specifics. It would also look to educate young people "on marriage and love".

China had a fertility rate of just 1.3 children per woman in 2020, recent data showed, on par with ageing societies like Japan and Italy and far short of the roughly 2.1 needed for replacement level.

"People are held back not by the two-children limit, but by the incredibly high costs of raising children in today's China. Housing, extracurricular activities, food, trips, and everything else add up quickly," Yifei Li, a sociologist at NYU Shanghai, told Reuters.

"Raising the limit itself is unlikely to tilt anyone's calculus in a meaningful way, in my view."

Zhang Xinyu, a 30-year-old mother of one from Zhengzhou, the capital of Henan province, said the problem was that women bore most of the responsibility for raising children.

"If men could do more to raise the child, or if families could give more consideration for women who had just had children, actually a lot of women would be able to have a second child," she told Reuters.

"...But thinking of the big picture, realistically, I don't want to have a second child. And a third is even more impossible."

In a poll on Xinhua's Weibo (NASDAQ:WB) account asking #AreYouReady for the three-child policy, about 29,000 of 31,000 respondents said they would “never think of it” while the remainder chose among the options: "I'm ready and very eager to do so", "it's on my agenda", or “I'm hesitating and there's lot to consider”.

The poll was later removed.

"I am willing to have three children if you give me 5 million yuan ($785,650)," one user posted.

Share prices in birth- and fertility-related companies surged.

'TOO LATE NOW'

Early this month, a once-in-a-decade census showed that the population grew at its slowest rate during the last decade since the 1950s, to 1.41 billion, fuelling concerns that China would grow old before it gets wealthy as well as criticism that it had waited too long to address declining births.

"This is without a doubt a step in the right direction, but still it's a bit timid," Shuang Ding, chief economist at Standard Chartered (OTC:SCBFF) in Hong Kong, told Reuters.

"A fully liberalised birth policy should have been implemented at least five years ago, but it's too late now, although its better late than never," he said.

China's politburo also said on Monday that it would phase in delays in retirement ages, but did not provide any details.

Fines of 130,000 yuan ($20,440) were being imposed on people for having a third child as of late last year, according to a government notice in the city of Weihai.

Fearing a population explosion, in 1979 China implemented its one-child policy, which succeeded in curbing population growth but also led to coerced sterilisations and sex-selective abortions that exacerbated a gender imbalance as many parents preferred male children.

A study published earlier this year by academics from Hangzhou University found that the two-child policy encouraged wealthier couples who already had a child and were "less sensitive to child-rearing costs", while driving up the costs of child care and education and discouraging first-time parents.

© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Children play at a waterfront in Shekou area of Shenzhen, Guangdong province, China March 15, 2021. REUTERS/David Kirton

Su Meizhen, a human resources manager in Beijing, said she was "super-happy" to be pregnant with her third child.

"We won't have to pay the fine and we'll be able to get a hukou," she said, referring to the urban residence permit that enables families to receive benefits including sending their children to local public schools.

Latest comments

I'm going short on Chinese *******factories!!!
Can't believe this site bans a perfectly normal word for rubber thing you are supposed to put on your ....
3 times more unruly Chinese. No, we don't need that.
Herd population c.ontro/l. Are we that low i/q ?
China did the right thing here... when thry see a problem, they will solve it. Thry are a problem solver governance...
China did thst over almost 10 years ago. Sinophobia 101. Why don’t these news outlets just face up to the fact that the increase in Asian hate crimes is fueled with cold war china bad rhetoric. This is manufacturing consent at its finest.
throughout all history, social orders have had to control population. if there are to many people, the land and system can't keep up. if there are not enough people, nature can run overrun a people, and the order can't grow.I think China looks at the long term, and manages affairs accordingly. in the west, it's an instant convience society, and we suffer for today's choices down the road.
Wow! Someone who gets it. Cheers
that's long term economic growth/consumption for China. the liberal 60's doomed our country to economic decline, because Hollywood & corporates marketing strategies promoted a selfish living lifestyle for the sake of instant profits. family and responsibilities became "uncool", and having a good time "cool". I think that's the real reason liberal are heavily promoting immigration. they know we need more consumers. it's always about the money, but this is a much bigger issue than most.
we should never have done Business with a country where the gov tells people how many kids they can have..
But then again: some people should never be allowed to have kids
LOL the country that democrats were swooning over because they said their COVID-19 death totals were so low, not questioning their numbers. Now magically they need people to have a lot more kids.
Who tf is swooning? ??? You need help
What 4 chan incel room did you get that moronic theory?
Clearly China was not lying about their death totals from COVID, thank goodness US media blindly obeys everything China says since they pay the bills.
FYI, in case it is not clear, the first part is sarcastic.
Trying to control the way a tree grows its branches and roots is plain folly. Post
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.