Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Britain's bank 'ring-fencing' rules need simplifying, review shows

EconomyJan 19, 2022 11:51AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of the Canary Wharf financial district in London, Britain April 25, 2021. Picture taken April 25 with a drone. REUTERS/Kevin Coombs

By Huw Jones

LONDON (Reuters) - Capital rules imposed on Britain's high street banks after bailouts during the global financial crisis have not harmed competition but may need simplifying, a government-sponsored review said on Wednesday.

Since January 2019, banks like HSBC, Lloyds (LON:LLOY), NatWest and Barclays (LON:BARC) with deposits of 25 billion pounds ($34 billion) or more have been required to hold extra capital around their retail divisions to insulate them from any blow-ups in separate trading and investment operations.

The so-called ring-fencing regime was introduced after Britain's taxpayers had to bail out several undercapitalised banks during the 2007-09 financial crisis.

"The ring-fencing regime has had no significant impact on competition in retail banking or its submarkets," the review, commissioned by the finance ministry, said in an interim statement.

"The current rules have resulted in unintended consequences that create unnecessary rigidity for customers, banks, and regulators."

Banking lobby UK Finance said last year that Britain should consider dismantling the regime or risk harming post-Brexit competitiveness.

"The ring-fencing regime has the potential to constrain the competitiveness of UK banks, but to date this impact has not been substantial," the review statement said.

UK Finance said it was important to consider whether the benefits of ring-fencing to financial stability outweigh its costs, and it looked forward to the review finalising recommendations for improving outcomes to customers, increasing the regime's flexibility and cutting complexity.

The review, chaired by finance industry veteran Keith Skeoch, signalled in its statement that later this year it would recommend increasing flexibility in the rules to reduce unnecessary complexity, rather than any radical surgery.

The Bank of England's head of banking supervision, Deputy Governor Sam Woods, has vowed to defend the ring-fencing rules to his last drop of blood as banks lobbied for the 25 billion pound threshold to be raised.

Goldman Sachs (NYSE:GS) closed its easy access saving business in 2020 to new customers in Britain after deposits surged close to the 25 billion threshold that would force it to comply with the ring-fencing rules.

Banks have warned that ring-fencing has triggered unfair competition in mortgages as banks inside the ring-fence use deposits to fight for more market share.

The evidence suggests that ring-fencing has not damaged competition in consumer credit, small business lending or mortgages, the review said.

The review said the ring-fencing rules have helped to bolster financial stability, though these benefits have not been observed for smaller and less complex banks which don't have investment banking operations.

Woods has already flagged plans for simpler rules for smaller lenders.

Banks have separate rules on resolution, or procedures for winding themselves up in a crisis without needing taxpayer bailouts, and the review said these rules coupled with ring-fencing added complexity to regulation.

($1 = 0.7350 pounds)

Britain's bank 'ring-fencing' rules need simplifying, review shows
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Robert Copeland
Robert Copeland Jan 19, 2022 8:36AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Barclay's & Bank of England need to hold extra reserves with the outstanding debt and liabilities they hold.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email