Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

Democrats' two-step infrastructure plan draws Republican ire

Published 06/24/2021, 01:04 AM
Updated 06/25/2021, 02:58 AM
© Reuters. U.S. President Joe Biden delivers remarks after a roundtable discussion with advisors on steps to curtail U.S. gun violence, at the White House in Washington, U.S. June 23, 2021. REUTERS/Jonathan Ernst/Files

By David Morgan, Richard Cowan and Andrea Shalal

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -Hours after President Joe Biden declared "We have a deal" to renew the infrastructure of the United States, the Senate's top Republican lashed out at plans to follow the $1.2 trillion bipartisan bill with another measure funding what Democrats call "human infrastructure."

Biden and top congressional Democrats - House of Representatives Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer - had long signaled their plan to link the bipartisan deal with another bill including spending on home health care and child care.

The second measure would be passed through a Senate maneuver called reconciliation https://www.reuters.com/world/us/us-senates-reconciliation-process-its-not-way-it-sounds-2021-06-16, which would allow it to take effect without Republican votes.

Biden told reporters at the White House that he expected quick action on both measures - or neither would survive.

"I expect that in the coming months this summer, before the fiscal year is over, that we will have voted on this (bipartisan) bill - the infrastructure bill - as well as voted on the budget resolution," he said. "But if only one comes to me, I'm not signing it. It's in tandem."

That drew a harsh response from Republican Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell.

"Less than two hours after publicly commending our colleagues and actually endorsing the bipartisan agreement, the President took the extraordinary step of threatening to veto it," McConnell said on the Senate floor. "It almost makes your head spin."

McConnell, Pelosi and Schumer have not been directly involved with the bipartisan infrastructure talks. McConnell has not publicly stated if he would back the initiative, though he called it "encouraging" in his floor remarks.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Lindsey Graham (NYSE:GHM), one of the 21 senators who had negotiated the bipartisan deal, said in a tweet: "If reports are accurate that President Biden is refusing to sign a bipartisan deal unless reconciliation is also passed, that would be the ultimate deal breaker for me."

Progressive (NYSE:PGR) members of Congress - some of whom were pushing for a sweeping $6 trillion bill - had indicated they would not support the smaller bipartisan bill without a companion measure.

The $1.2 trillion framework https://www.reuters.com/article/usa-biden-infrastructure-details/factbox-whats-in-the-us-senates-12-trillion-infrastructure-plan-idUSL2N2O62AV includes $579 billion in new spending on major investments in the power grid, broadband internet services and passenger and freight rail.

The eight-year proposal contains $109 billion for roads, bridges and major projects; $73 billion for power infrastructure; $66 billion for passenger and freight rail; $65 billion for broadband access; $49 billion for public transit; and $25 billion for airports, according to a White House statement.

That spending falls far short of Biden's original ambitions on schools, climate change mitigation, and support for parents and caregivers, and it doesn't include his bedrock pledge to make the U.S. economy more fair by increasing taxes on the rich and corporations.

Biden vowed to move "full steam ahead" on those priorities.

The compromise package would be paid for through more than a dozen funding mechanisms, including $100 billion in estimated tax revenues from a ramp-up in enforcement by the Internal Revenue Service, unused COVID-19 aid money, unemployment insurance funds returned by U.S. states, and oil sales from the Strategic Petroleum Reserve. [L2N2O62SZ]

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

The phrase "infrastructure week" became a Washington punchline during Donald Trump's four years as president after he promised to make such legislation a centerpiece but did not unveil a plan for Congress to consider, including financing mechanisms for projects.

Schumer said he supported the outline of the deal but wanted to see the details. He also said the $1.2 trillion bill focused on physical infrastructure would not get the Democratic votes needed to pass it without an accompanying package tackling social issues, including home healthcare.

"All parties understand, we won't get enough votes to pass either, unless we have enough votes to pass both," Schumer said on the Senate floor. He said the Senate would aim for a vote on the bipartisan plan next month.

RECONCILIATION REDUX

Pelosi said the House would vote on the bipartisan bill only after the Senate had also approved the additional reconciliation bill, meaning the battle over the bills could extend into September and beyond.

Biden, seeking to fuel economic growth and address income inequality after the coronavirus pandemic, initially proposed spending about $2.3 trillion. Republicans chafed at his definition of infrastructure, which included fighting climate change and providing care for children and the elderly.

The White House later trimmed the package to about $1.7 trillion in an unsuccessful bid to win the Republican support needed for any plan to get the 60 votes required to advance most legislation in the evenly split 100-seat Senate.

A major sticking point had been how to pay for the investments. Biden has pledged not to increase taxes on Americans earning less than $400,000 a year, while Republicans are determined to protect a 2017 cut in corporate taxes.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Republican Senator John Thune said there were questions about whether watchdogs, including the Congressional Budget Office, would recognize some of the funding mechanisms as achieving savings.

Latest comments

"Human Infrastructure" - Yeah. I don't see the Trumpublicans going for this much common sense.
don't tell yellen about this debt plan, she will collapse
as inflation goes higher and higher and higher. literally destroying the country and they are either clueless or don't care.
We and our kids and their kids will be paying out the nose for this garbage. Its time people understood, we are broke as a nation and there is no money!
we finally have an administrationthat's getting something done about our dilapidated infastructure.
Partisan do nothing McConnell would have been throwing confetti in the air if the orange ape-man had proposed the deal.
well, republicans only care about federal budget deficits during democrat presidents/administrations, during republican administrations all of the sudden it's not a topic anymore
Love or hate him, Trump was not a swamp insider. Now the swamp is getting bigger and bigger
limit up..insider no.. he created an even bigger swamp. Trump's pay to play schemes, millions of dollars in gifts to his family from foreign governments, including China, creating tax policies that dropped his business, and his family's tax liabilities by70%; his attempted use of the Attorney Generals Office to hide his lawlessness, and attack his enemies, makes him king of the Washington DC swamp.
is that why Trump signed the first 2 covid relief bills and added $3T to the national debt?
Mitch McConnell has to go.
A second bill will address all of the pork not included in this bill. And it will pass via reconciliation by democrat socialists
If Republicans support this thing, they can kiss the mid-terms goodbye. Republicans rocked 2020, flipped nearly half dozen house seats. The only thing Democrats won was the Presidency, but that involve them losing on election night, halting counting for days in swing states, then magically finding boxes of ballots for Biden in key counties and boarding up windows form observes while counting ballots. All republicans have to do is let Biden keep talking about chocolate cholate chip ice cream and sni.ff.ing children while democrats in Congress waste time crying bout Trump and pushing far left agenda and republicans can easily dominate 2022. I am an independent and the modern DNC has me even rooting for republicans to stop these tyrannical and wasteful democrats who have gone completely insane. Need to maintain checks and balances....DNC going full China/North Korea.
American roads, bridges and infrastructure is falling apart. this is much needed. w t f you talking about ?
what hsppened to all those shovel ready projects. Infrastrucure spending is always a political pork darling.
If Republicans support this thing, they can kiss the mid-terms goodbye. Republicans rocked 2020, flipped nearly half dozen house seats. The only thing Democrats won was the Presidency, but that involve them losing on election night, halting counting for days in swing states, then magically finding boxes of ballots for Biden in key counties and boarding up windows form observes while counting ballots. All republicans have to do is let Biden keep talking about chocolate cholate chip ice cream and sni.ff.ing children while democrats in Congress waste time crying bout Trump and pushing far left agenda and republicans can easily dominate 2022. I am an independent and the modern DNC has me even rooting for republicans to stop these tyrannical and wasteful democrats who have gone completely insane. Need to maintain checks and balances....DNC going full China/North Korea.
Make Parks, NOT roadways. Tic-toc.
unconventional infrastructure is the euphemism of the year.. home health care and elderly care has nothing to do with infrastructure
You are are absolutely right. Big lies for more spending with much worse inflation that will destroy the economy and the country. And the rest of the world is also doing the same thing spending and spending through more debts.
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.