Breaking News
Get Actionable Insights with InvestingPro+: Start 7 Day FREE Trial Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Analysis-Brazil's spending cap brings fiscal surplus - and candidates' ire

Economy May 09, 2022 01:42PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A general view of the skyline of Sao Paulo April 2, 2015. REUTERS/Paulo Whitaker

By Marcela Ayres and Bernardo Caram

BRASILIA (Reuters) - Strong commodity prices and a recovering job market have helped a sharp improvement in Brazil's public finances, analysts say, allaying concerns about the country's short-term fiscal health and helping to lure an influx of foreign investment.

But the impressive public-sector surplus is also providing fodder for presidential candidates on the left and right who want to overhaul fiscal rules after this October's election.

Right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro and his main challenger, leftist former President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, have both blasted a constitutional spending cap that has been key to shoring up public finances since a deep 2015-2016 recession.

Without that spending ceiling, which limits the growth of federal expenditures to keep pace with inflation, Brazil could soon start a new chapter in its economic telenovela.

"With the spending cap, it's easy to predict how public debt will behave," said Luciano Sobral, chief economist at Neo Investimentos. "But no one thinks it will survive next year with either Lula or Bolsonaro. We don't know what will take its place."

Federal government revenue soared 26% in the first quarter – nearly 15% above inflation – which helped to lift the public sector's primary surplus to 1.4% of GDP in the 12 months through February, according to central bank data last week.

Rather than celebrating the strong finances, Bolsonaro lashed out at rules keeping "excess revenue" beyond his reach.

"You can't spend a penny of that on infrastructure because of the spending cap," Bolsonaro said in a radio interview last month. "A lot of people say this is something that needs to be changed ... We will discuss this issue after the election."

His rival Lula, who is leading in the polls, has also made no secret of his plan to scrap the spending cap, saying his priority is poverty reduction rather than fiscal targets.

Investors have been sanguine so far about the shifting policy winds, flocking to Latin America's largest economy as a relatively safe bet amid the war in Ukraine and fresh wave of COVID-19 rattling China.

Net portfolio inflows to Brazil totaled $5 billion in the first three months of this year, helping to strengthen Brazil's currency almost 10% against the U.S. dollar in the year to date, even after a recent selloff.

Brazil's five-year experiment with a spending ceiling shows it has been key to an improving its fiscal position, said Rafaela Vitória, chief economist at Banco Inter.

She noted the country's last bout of double-digit inflation, in late 2015, also pushed up government revenue – but spiraling expenditures erased those gains.

Government officials say Brazil has also done its homework with a labor reform and new rules for infrastructure investment boosting economic growth and helping to beat negative fiscal forecasts.

Adolfo Sachsida, a special adviser to the economy minister, said private economists had underestimated government revenue for the past 20 months in a row by his count.

"The market is underestimating the strength of the microeconomic reforms that we have made," he said. "Of course, we also have concerns, but I invite everyone to look at the numbers. The data are clear. Our fiscal improvement is not a matter of opinion," he added.

But the data has done little to change the mind of Bolsonaro or Lula when it comes to Brazil's fiscal framework next year.

Analysis-Brazil's spending cap brings fiscal surplus - and candidates' ire

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Ronaldo Almeida
Ronaldo Almeida May 09, 2022 4:16PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Well written. I'm brazilian, and obviously disillusioned with the political outlook.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email