Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious OutperformanceFind Stocks Now

U.S. Supreme Court urged by 22 states to maintain eviction ban

Published 06/11/2021, 11:48 AM
Updated 06/11/2021, 02:46 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Protesters surround the LA Superior Court to prevent an upcoming wave of evictions and call on Governor Gavin Newsom to pass an eviction moratorium, amid the global outbreak of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), in Los Angeles, California, U.S.,

By David Shepardson

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The attorneys general of 22 states on Friday urged the U.S. Supreme Court not to end the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's pandemic-related residential eviction moratorium that has been challenged by landlord groups.

The landlords asked the Supreme Court last week to issue an order stopping the national ban on evictions, which was first implemented last September and is due to expire on June 30. CDC Director Rochelle Walensky declined to say this week if the agency will again extend the moratorium, saying discussions are ongoing.

Led by the Alabama Association of Realtors, the landlord groups argued that the CDC exceeded its authority when it halted evictions to help renters during the pandemic. The CDC imposed the ban to combat the spread of COVID-19 and prevent homelessness during the pandemic.

Ending the moratorium "could force millions of vulnerable individuals from their homes into the streets, crowded shelters, or into contact with family and friends within or across state lines," the state attorneys general said the court filing.

"An unprecedented wave of mass evictions - amid the embryonic stages of the postpandemic recovery - would be catastrophic," they added.

The 22 states include California, New York, Virginia and Michigan, with the District of Columbia joining as well.

The landlord groups said U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich's May 5 decision nullifying the moratorium should take effect immediately. Despite ruling in favor of the landlords, Friedrich agreed to place her decision on hold to allow President Joe Biden's administration to appeal.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"Every day the stay remains in place, applicants' property continues to (be) unlawfully occupied and their rental income continues to be unlawfully cut off," the landlords wrote. "Nine months of overreach is enough."

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia last week said it would not lift the judge's stay order. The D.C. Circuit said the CDC eviction ban was likely lawful, but has not yet issued a ruling on the merits of the case.

In the landlords' appeal, they said property owners "have been losing over $13 billion every month under the moratorium."

The CDC has said 30 to 40 million people could be at risk of eviction without the moratorium. Advocacy groups have said low-income renters were particularly vulnerable.

Latest comments

Just another attempt to defend the working middle class and small business operators
We landlords are being de our rights as property owners. We are lawfully entitled to cause an eviction for nonpayment of rent this is a blatant overreach by the governments. A tenant who doesn't pay rent is not entitled to occupy by government dictates!
The number of people truly unable to pay is smaller than reported. Most of the renters are paying as economy opens up. People not paying are the dead beats who are living free and spending their rent money along with stimulus monies. As a former Lanlord there are people who knew how to do this scam
People promoting this ban fail to consider the landlords who are relying on rental income; such as young families and retirees. Also, a lot of large pension funds, often belonging to public sector employees and retirees are also landlords. So why should they pay someone elses rent. Let’s not forget to mention the huge demand for employees now!
Plus, if mass evictions were to occur it would them mean mass vacancies!!
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.