Pfizer cannot recoup $75 million from SEC insider trading settlement, judge rules

Published 11/19/2024, 05:09 PM
Updated 11/19/2024, 08:16 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: A person walks past the Pfizer building in Manhattan, New York City, U.S., March 2, 2021. REUTERS/Carlo Allegri/File Photo

By Jonathan Stempel

NEW YORK (Reuters) -A federal judge on Tuesday rejected Pfizer (NYSE:PFE)'s bid to recoup about $75.2 million left over from a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission insider trading settlement with billionaire Steven A. Cohen's former hedge fund SAC Capital Management.

U.S. District Judge Victor Marrero in Manhattan said Wyeth, a drugmaker Pfizer bought in 2009, did not qualify as a victim of the securities violations underlying the SEC case, and therefore was not entitled to the funds.

Marrero directed that the money be paid to the U.S. Treasury, which the SEC had requested.

Pfizer and its lawyers did not immediately respond to requests for comment.

The dispute stemmed from a $602 million civil settlement tied to trading in Wyeth and drugmaker Elan by Mathew Martoma, who worked at an SAC unit and was later convicted, based on a neurologist's tips about a 2008 Alzheimer's drug trial.

SAC pleaded guilty to fraud in 2013 and paid $1.8 billion in settlements with the SEC and other authorities.

The SEC had $75.2 million left over after compensating Wyeth and Elan investors for their losses. Pfizer said it deserved that money because the neurologist, Sidney Gilman, breached a fiduciary duty to Wyeth, where he was a consultant.

But the judge said the reputational harm that Wyeth suffered from the scandal did not mean it also suffered financial harm.

"The court certainly agrees that corporations whose secrets are misappropriated for insider trading purposes are generally victims of wrongdoing," he wrote. "But Pfizer has failed to allege how the insider trading scheme and Wyeth's subsequent reputational harm qualifies as pecuniary harm for purposes of distributing the disgorged funds."

Marrero added that a $7 billion decline in Wyeth's market value following the drug trial had nothing to do with the insider trading scheme, which became public three years later.

Cohen was not criminally charged, but accepted a two-year ban on managing outside money to end an SEC probe into his supervision of Martoma.

He changed SAC Capital's name to Point72 Asset Management in 2014, and stopped trading for that fund in September. Cohen is worth $21.3 billion according to Forbes magazine.

The case is SEC v CR Intrinsic Investors LLC et al, U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York, No. 12-08466.

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2025 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.