Get 40% Off
⚠ Earnings Alert! Which stocks are poised to surge?
See the stocks on our ProPicks radar. These strategies gained 19.7% year-to-date.
Unlock full list

Nearly 95% of all new jobs during Obama era were part-time, or contract

Published 12/21/2016, 12:10 AM
Updated 12/21/2016, 12:23 AM
© Reuters.  Decline in standard of living for many.

Investing.com -- A new study by economists from Harvard and Princeton indicates that 94% of the 10 million new jobs created during the Obama era were temporary positions.

The study shows that the jobs were temporary, contract positions, or part-time "gig" jobs in a variety of fields.

Female workers suffered most heavily in this economy, as work in traditionally feminine fields, like education and medicine, declined during the era.

The research by economists Lawrence Katz of Harvard University and Alan Krueger at Princeton University shows that the proportion of workers throughout the U.S., during the Obama era, who were working in these kinds of temporary jobs, increased from 10.7% of the population to 15.8%.

Krueger, a former chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, was surprised by the finding.

The disappearance of conventional full-time work, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. work, has hit every demographic. “Workers seeking full-time, steady work have lost,” said Krueger.

Under Obama, 1 million fewer workers, overall, are working than before the beginning of the Great Recession.

The outgoing president believes his administration was a net positive for workers, however.

"Since I signed Obamacare into law (in 2010), our businesses have added more than 15 million new jobs," said Obama, during his farewell press conference last Friday, covered by Investing.com.

Latest comments

ACA forced non-essential personnel into part-time 29 hours per week jobs.
The companies who chose to put their profit margin before their employees played a part in that as well.
It must be 'selective memory' time.  The study can't include things that Mitch McConnell wouldn't allow to happen.  The GOP blocked the American Jobs Act.  According to Mark Zandi, Chief Economist of Moody’s Analytics before the plan could be stalled, “The plan would add 2 percentage points to GDP growth next year, add 1.9 million jobs, and cut the unemployment rate by a percentage point.  There should be nothing controversial about this piece of legislation.  Everything in here is the kind of proposal that’s been supported by both Democrats and Republicans – including many who sit here tonight.  And everything in this bill will be paid for. Everything. “Senate Republicans blocked the $447 billion measure, and Senate Republican Leader Mitch McConnell denounced it as “a charade that’s meant to give Democrats a political edge” in 2012.  Just like blocking the Russian interference into our election that didn't happen as planned, ask the Senate Majority Leader, you know, the GOP Congress.
Maybe you have selective memory. What happened to Obamas "stimulus" that was supposed to create "shovel ready jobs"? IT DIDNT. Or the GREEN JOBS Obama gave billions toward...ALL THOSE COMPANIES WENT UNDER! It was a money laundering scheme! NO JOBS and billions wasted! Also, Obama said the elections couldn't be interfered with. He said to "stop whining and get votes", then Queen Hillary loses because people hate her and they come up with a collision hoax.
During Obama's tenure, Liberals were telling us to get used to 1 percent growth as being the new norm in the US. Well under Trump we're at over 4 percent growth. So how can Obama take credit for any of it if in his own words he said it was impossible
The next volunteer for the ‘I won’t admit, or, I don’t understand, the difference between quarterly GDP (4%) and annual GDP (no one said 1%. You made that up.)   Further, a one-time Q2 GDP of 4.1% is not a trend, since it was heavily influenced, by as much as 0.7%, by one-time events like tax cuts, and, more importantly, a 9300% rise in soybean exports, reduction in soybean inventories, as well as exports in oil, steel, aluminum, corn, just to beat late June/early July tariff deadlines. You should go back to whatever else that keeps you paid, because, economic analysis isn’t it. https://www.newsmax.com/t/finance/article/853625?section=edwardyardeni&keywords=fed-study-new-normal&year=2018&month=04&date=10&id=853625&aliaspath=%2FFinance%2FArticle%2FFinance-ArticleTemplate
Obama was the first President since HERBERT HOOVER to not have a 3.0 ANNUAL GDP. Trump did have an annual 3.0 GDP. AMERICA IS BACK UNDER PRESIDENT TRUMP
 https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/jun/19/americas-sluggish-economic-growth-the-new-normal/
During Obama's tenure, Liberals were telling us to get used to 1 percent growth as being the new norm in the US. Well under Trump we're at over 4 percent growth. So how can Obama take credit for any of it if in his own words he said it was impossible
I don't understand why this should come as any surprise to Mr Krueger.  Small business is the backbone of our economy and ObamaCare mandates we're breaking that back. Their only escaping the pain of ObamaCare was to reduce the positions of their employees to part time. . . It sure does not take an advance degree in economics to figure that out.  This is the result when you hire academics instead of "do'ers" to these government positions.
What I DO not understand, why this should come as a surprise to Mr. Kruger?  Small business is the backbone of our economy.  The ObamaCare mandates were devasting to small business owners. Their only way to avoid the crippling pain of ObamaCare was to reduce employees to part time positions  It does not take an advance degree in economics to figure that out.
This is really going to mess with everyone who says that Trump's job growth is the same as Obama's in terms of numbers, supposedly discrediting Trump's success with the market.
The notion that today's booming economy is in any way related to Obama is just laughable. . Remember, Obama was over seeing america's decline and we were told to get used to it, it's our "new norm.". ONE MONTH post 2016 elections, consumer confidence levels soared to a 15 year high and has not looked back ever since. . The Left seems to be stuck in a perpetual state of depression. The rest of America is still rejoicing!
The largest demographic taking those PT jobs are the elderly, whose IRA's 401k's got destroyed in the last financial collapse and now are earning virtually nothing on their savings, forcing them to supplement their income.. Among the 25-50 year old population, unemployment is much higher and those are the people who are suffering.
I'm not sure who wrote this article but it's incredibly intellectually dishonest. . . Number 1, the study wasn't new, it was written in April, 2. the study wasn't political and covered years 1995 to 2005 then 2005 to 2015 (Ie did not isolate presidency). 3. They author of this article have take alternative work arrangement to mean part time and contract rather than what was written in the study.
Why does it matter when the study was taken?  If it was taken from 2005 to 2015, that is majority of Obama's presidency, facts don't lie.. . And alternative work arrangement does also mean part-time, so you're wrong there.
Not Blindly Following. It's 94% dude... NINETY-FOUR PERCENT! Even if Obama was given the absolute benefit of the doubt and we bent over backwards to say that the 4 years of Bush that was included in the study consisted of 100% temporary part-time jobs, which isn't plausible, that still leaves Obama's 6 years with AT LEAST 90% of his jobs being temporary & part-time. You are reaching as far as you can to find an excuse to latch onto to make your Lord and Savior, Obama, not look as bad. It's pathetic really. Obama was a failure. Bush was a failure. They were both horrible presidents. Now that we actually have a president who wants to bring long-term jobs and manufacturing careers back to America through protectionist policies and better trade deals, democrats have a problem with it, because "racism" and "sexism" although he has done more for blacks and women than Obama did in 8 years. The proof is in this article and in Trump's 500 day accomplishments.
he was a failed president who promised change and delivered none. Instead of uniting a country that was ready for an african american president he went out his way to race bait and drive division deep among the poor and middle class why his elites flourished. Now step aside obama and let a leader run the country. Trump has done more as president elect for workers than obama did in 8 years.
 Actually Obama and the democrats controlled congress in both chambers for 2 years, the house and the Senate and he even had a supermajoity with 60 out of 100 seats in the Senate.
 No. Obama and the democrats have complete *******over the congress for 2 whole years. They had a supermajority over both chambers of congress, including 60 out of 100 Senate seats.
 he had both the house & senate & did nothing so don't excuse his failures on that
you are allowed to claim unemployment benefit only for 6 months, after that you are considered employed, so all the people who lost the job & pass 6months not counted in this 4.6%, so figure out the real unemployment, no body can fix it, all the companies move to China,Mexico & helping those countries & bring the goods back here and marketing our people, who has no jobs,With governments quantitative easing,corporations have good time,pumping more air Dow 20,000,ordinary people become more more homeless,all the public parks doesnt need security any more, they are fill with homeless.
And something like 94 million not working, but 4.6% unemployment so you know...stats and stuff.
haha totally. is a disgrace and finally the people have woken up
Are you guys serious about this figure? 94M unemployed in America? OMG
Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.