Get 40% Off
🤯 This Tech Portfolio is up 29% YTD! Join Now to Get April’s Top PicksGet The Picks – Just 99 USD

It's complicated! Don't view Brexit as hard or soft: S&P

Published 01/18/2017, 01:48 PM
Updated 01/18/2017, 01:50 PM
© Reuters. File photo of a cyclist wearing a pro-Brexit badge on her Union flag themed helmet outside the Supreme Court in Parliament Square, central London

© Reuters. File photo of a cyclist wearing a pro-Brexit badge on her Union flag themed helmet outside the Supreme Court in Parliament Square, central London

By Kirsten Donovan

DAVOS, Switzerland (Reuters) - Brexit should not be viewed in terms of 'hard' or 'soft' but rather as a complicated process of redistributing sovereignty, S&P Global's chief economist said on Wednesday.

Speaking in the Global Markets Forum live from the World Economic Forum in Davos, Paul Sheard also said a recent rise in bond yields should be viewed, in principle, as a positive development.

Here are some excerpts from the conversation.

QUESTION: What are your thoughts on the UK's economic outlook after Prime Minister May's comments yesterday indicating it would leave the single market?

ANSWER: We've already shaved several basis points off our (UK) growth forecasts for the next two years. For the time being it is an uncertainty shock more than anything else. I wouldn't look at Brexit too much in terms of zero-one, hard-soft etc but more as a complicated process of a recontracting of sovereignty sharing among members. But it is a negotiation so it makes sense for the prime minister to give some clarity and lay out some key principles but also keep some cards close to the chest.

Q: What are your oil forecasts at the moment? Have they or are they likely to be raised now we look to have steadied around $55 a barrel?

A: Our oil experts expect prices to trend upwards over the medium term, on reasonably strong global demand, but to remain capped by the latent supply from shale. I am skeptical about the ability of OPEC to exercise much market power now that shale oil is the swing supply.

Q: Which countries will feel the pressure most from the recent rise in yields?

A: The rise in yields is in principle a welcome development. We just spent X number of years fretting about secular stagnation and low/zero/negative rates. We found that the likes of Turkey, Venezuela and Argentina were among the most notable emerging markets that are vulnerable to a "Fed shock". LatAm comes out as vulnerable on rates as well as a China hard-landing. Among economies least hit by rising rates are the likes of China, Russia and Brazil, ie the largest domestic demand- oriented economies.

Q: If there is all-out trade war as the kind of worst case scenario, how much would the likes of Mexico's economy be hit? Canada might be the other big loser too, I guess?

A: In general the economies that would be most hit by a real and sustained trade war would be the smaller EM and export-oriented developed economies. China and the U.S. both have large domestic markets so could sustain growth a bit better. Mexico and other smaller economies in LatAm and in emerging Asia would be big losers. China has a large domestic market but it is at the wrong stage of economic development to want to cut itself off from the global economy.

To read Sheard's comments on South Africa and Mexico see [L5N1F83W0]

(This interview was conducted in the Reuters Global Markets Forum, a chat room hosted on the Eikon platform. For more information on the forum or to join the conversation, follow this link: https://forms.thomsonreuters.com/communities/)

© Reuters. File photo of a cyclist wearing a pro-Brexit badge on her Union flag themed helmet outside the Supreme Court in Parliament Square, central London

(This version of the story was refiled to add name of chief economist, paragraph 2)

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.