Breaking News
0

China’s cooling economy sparks debate on scope of fiscal policy

EconomyJul 18, 2018 02:40AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. China’s cooling economy sparks debate on scope of fiscal policy

BEIJING (Reuters) - China's fiscal policy should help steer structural changes rather than stimulating growth in a forceful way, a senior finance ministry researcher said in remarks published on Wednesday, amid a heated debate on how to steer policy as the economy slows.

The remarks by Liu Shangxi, head of Chinese Academy of Fiscal Sciences under the finance ministry, come amid a debate among government researchers on whether fiscal policy should help to soften the impact of a trade war with the United States.

"The current proactive fiscal policy, which is different from the traditional expansionary policy, is not direct government effort to expand demand, but indirect effort through stimulating market vitality, optimizing resource allocation and increasing quality supply," Liu wrote in the official Economic Information Daily.

China's fiscal policy should focus on adjusting the country's economic structures and controlling risks, instead of stimulating the economy in an indiscriminate way, Liu said.

China's economic growth slowed slightly to 6.7 percent in the second quarter as Beijing's efforts to contain debt hurt activity, while June factory output growth weakened to a two-year low in a worrying sign for investment and exporters as a trade war with the United States intensified.

The economy is starting to feel the pinch from a multi-year crackdown on riskier lending and debt, problems which were fueled in part by a massive stimulus program to support the economy during the global financial crisis.

The regulatory tightening has driven up corporate borrowing costs, prompting the People's Bank of China to cut banks' reserve requirement ratios (RRR) three times this year.

Liu's comments are the latest development in a brewing war of words started by the central bank's research heard Xu Zhong who said fiscal policy is not active enough and the budget deficit ratio this year should be higher.

Xu's remarks prompted an unidentified finance ministry official to write in the financial magazine Caixin that the size of the budget deficit does not simply indicate the finance ministry's push for a proactive fiscal policy.

Xu also wrote last month that China cannot rely on monetary policy easing to resolve its structural problems, and said fiscal policy should play a bigger role.

The central bank overseas monetary policy while the finance ministry supervises fiscal policy. It unclear whether the current debate reflects the policy stances of the two agencies.

In March, Premier Li Keqiang announced a cut in the annual budget deficit target from 3 percent of gross domestic product in 2017 - the first cut since 2012 - but the finance ministry said fiscal policy remained supportive for economic growth given a jump in planned special bond issuance this year.

Policy insiders said the finance ministry, which has been cutting taxes, could quicken fiscal spending in the second half to support investment, but any forceful stimulus looks unlikely.

The central bank is widely expected to deliver more bank reserve ratio (RRR) cuts in the coming months.

China's Politburo, a top decision-making body of the ruling Communist Party, is likely to discuss economic policies later this month, the policy insiders said.

In April, a Politburo meeting added "expanding domestic demand" back to the policy statement issued by state media, after dropping it in December.

China’s cooling economy sparks debate on scope of fiscal policy
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind: 

  • Enrich the conversation
  • Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed.
  • Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically.
  •  Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and links within a comment will be removed
  • Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user.
  • Don’t Monopolize the Conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also believe strongly in giving everyone a chance to air their thoughts. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email