Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
💎 Access the Market Tools Trusted by Thousands of Investors Get Started

US weekly jobless claims race to 1-1/2-year high, economists urge caution

Published Jun 08, 2023 08:49AM ET Updated Jun 08, 2023 11:12PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
© Reuters. Hundreds of people line up outside the Kentucky Career Center, over two hours prior to its opening, to find assistance with their unemployment claims, in Frankfort, Kentucky, U.S. June 18, 2020. REUTERS/Bryan Woolston
 
C
-1.89%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
PNC
-1.08%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

By Lucia Mutikani

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The number of Americans filing new claims for unemployment benefits surged to the highest level in more than 1-1/2 years last week, but layoffs are probably not accelerating as the data covered the Memorial Day holiday, which could have injected some volatility.

The largest increase in applications in nearly two years reported by the Labor Department on Thursday was driven by rises in Ohio, Minnesota and California. After rampant fraud in Massachusetts briefly boosted claims to a 1-1/2-year high in May before being revised away, economists cautioned against reading too much into the latest rise.

"The jump in claims could be a sign of a pickup in layoffs, but given the volatility of claims from week-to-week, it is too soon to reach that conclusion," said Conrad DeQuadros, senior economic advisor at Brean Capital in New York.

"The narrowness of the increase in claims by state is a further factor suggesting we should wait for additional confirmation before concluding layoffs have picked up, especially given the fraud in Massachusetts recently."

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits jumped 28,000 to a seasonally adjusted 261,000 for the week ended June 3, the highest level since October 2021. Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 235,000 claims for the latest week.

Unadjusted claims increased only 10,535 to 219,391 last week, with applications in Ohio surging 6,345 and filings in California shooting up 5,173. Claims increased 2,746 in Minnesota. Applications in Ohio have risen in recent weeks, attributed by the state to layoffs in the manufacturing, automobile, and transportation and warehousing industries. Auto manufacturers usually close plants in summer for retooling.

"Some auto plants take temporary breaks during the summer although the dates change slightly every year which makes it hard for seasonal factors to capture correctly," said Gisela Hoxha, an economist at Citigroup (NYSE:C) in New York.

"This implies that there might be some additional volatility in initial claims over the coming months."

The four-week moving average of claims, considered a better measure of labor market trends as it strips out week-to-week volatility, rose 7,500 to 237,250.

Economists saw no impact on monetary policy from the claims data. The Federal Reserve is expected to keep its policy rate unchanged next Wednesday for the first time since March 2022 when it embarked on its fastest interest rate hiking campaign since the 1980s. The U.S. central bank has raised its policy rate by 500 basis points since then.

Stocks on Wall Street were trading higher. The dollar fell against a basket of currencies. U.S. Treasury prices rose.

GRADUAL SLOWDOWN

"Claims remain well below our estimate of 305,000 to be consistent with no monthly job growth, and it will take a more sustained increase in the level of claims to influence the Fed's monetary policy," said Matthew Martin, a U.S. economist at Oxford Economics in New York.

The government reported last week that the economy added 339,000 jobs in May. Although the unemployment rate increased to a seven-month high of 3.7% from 3.4% in April, it remains low by historical standards.

Job growth is being driven by the services sector, including the leisure and hospitality category, which is still catching up after businesses struggled to find workers over the last two years. Industries like healthcare and education also experienced accelerated retirements during the COVID-19 pandemic.

For some economists, however, the jump in claims suggested that layoffs were spreading from the technology sector and the interest rate-sensitive industries like housing, finance and manufacturing, which made headlines last year and early this year, to other segments of the economy.

"Headline-grabbing layoff announcements, however, typically take some time to be put into effect," said Stuart Hoffman, a senior economic advisor at PNC Financial (NYSE:PNC) in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. "This delay accounts for the recent rise in initial claims. This effect could also portend another escalation in the months to come, alongside the ever-widening net of jobs cuts spreading across industries."

The labor market is gradually cooling.

The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) reported on Monday that its services PMI dropped in May, attributed mostly to weakness in employment. According to the ISM, comments from services businesses ranged from "we are trying to do more with the same staff," to being "on a hiring freeze until there's a better understanding of where the economy is headed."

Overall, employers appear reluctant to let go of workers after difficulties finding labor during the pandemic.

The number of people receiving benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, fell 37,000 to 1.757 million during the week ending May 27, the lowest level since February, the claims report showed.

The low level of the so-called continuing claims suggests some laid off workers are still finding work easily, with 1.8 job openings for every unemployed person in April.

US weekly jobless claims race to 1-1/2-year high, economists urge caution
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (16)
Charlotte Graham
Charlotte Graham Jun 09, 2023 5:35AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Derick Lim
Derick Lim Jun 09, 2023 12:09AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Hopefully all tech companies will emulate Meta keep laying off employees while promoting AI...soon who needs employees when AI will solve global crisis...
YC Teng
YC Teng Jun 09, 2023 12:07AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Special Thanks to WW3 in Ukraine.
YC Teng
YC Teng Jun 09, 2023 12:06AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
TR 6%. Been saying this since Feb 2023.
gary leibowitz
gary leibowitz Jun 08, 2023 11:23PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
another wishful analysis that is completely unequivocally WRONG!  just use Common Sense. JOLTS report over 10 million, employment on a monthly scale is unprecedented and extremely TIGHT!  The notion that the FED will stop rate hikes and reverse them this year is insane.  AT best we get STAGFLATION, not disinflation or deflation.  Economics 101, Jobs tight causes wages to rise and productivity to slow.  EXACTLY what is happening.  Wages NOT rising as fast is not a reason to think it will not catch up.  This last 40 years bubble have developed in most segments of the economy for one reason DISINFLATION. We can hope and pray that continues but i would not count on it. I predicted the bank debacle 2 weeks before it occurred. Count on a lot more defaults and destructive behavior because of this high rate environment.
Charles Manson
Charles Manson Jun 08, 2023 7:51PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
RFK at 20% of the LIBTARD vote. Hope the CIA has no plans to dust off the old playbook of assassinations. He does have some good vision of what needs to be fixed in Pops Amerika. The one to watch.
Casador Del Oso
Casador Del Oso Jun 08, 2023 10:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Any unemployment claims number under 300k indicates a thriving job market. Slight monthly variations under this number are meaningless.
Elvis Durant
Elvis Durant Jun 08, 2023 10:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
stay off the weeeeeeeeeeed
Brad Albright
Brad Albright Jun 08, 2023 10:27AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
He's right.
jason xx
jason xx Jun 08, 2023 10:22AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Such hyperbole continuing claims went down
rob finch
rob finch Jun 08, 2023 10:06AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
More unemployed seems like weaker consumers to me. although greater supply of productive people could lead to cost reductions that would only really matter to low margin businesses that can't afford to pay market rates for help. I'd rather see such businesses stop making buggy whips.
Mark Jannetty
Mark Jannetty Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Joe Biden = economy destroyer
Show previous replies (3)
Ac Tektrader
Ac Tektrader Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
joe Biden's presidency has overseen one of the longest stretches of low unemployment. and at the same time a drop by over50% in the inflation rate.....
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Bill Powers  "4 words is not a rant. change your catchphrase."  - in this case 8 words is definitely a rant
Tre Hsi
Tre Hsi Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Ac Tektrader  on top of that, during the Obama-Biden administration we had 8 straight years of GDP growth and unemployment rate reduction, while the stock markets tripled.....if that's economy destroyer than by all mean do more of that
Mark Jannetty
Mark Jannetty Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
hilarious trying to compare anything about Biden to 2019. it's truly pathetic to try and use numbers of the covid shutdown. even with inflation down 50% like AC said, it's still more than 100% higher than trump. sad little sheep. I know that you have to keep saying it but not even you girls believe it. 🤣
First Last
First Last Jun 08, 2023 10:04AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Mark Jannetty   Trump had to deal w/ the covid pandemic (by politicizng it and telling Americans to inject disinfectants). The Obama-Biden administration had to deal with the GFC.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email