Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Cyber Monday Extended SALE: Up to 60% OFF InvestingPro+ CLAIM OFFER

U.S. Democratic lawmakers seek to undo 'predatory' banking rule

Economic Indicators Mar 25, 2021 05:01PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
2/2 © Reuters. FILE PHOTO: Senate Appropriations Hearing in Washington 2/2

By Katanga Johnson and Pete Schroeder

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Democratic U.S. lawmakers will seek to repeal a regulation introduced during former President Donald Trump's administration that they said allows predatory lenders to skirt state consumer protections - a setback for financial technology firms that stand to benefit from the rule.

Senator Chris Van Hollen and Senate Banking Committee Chairman Sherrod Brown on Thursday announced the introduction of a Senate resolution to rescind the so-called "true lender" rule. Congressman Chuy Garcia is set to introduce a House of Representatives version of the resolution on Friday, his office said.

The measure represents the first move by congressional Democrats to try to rescind one of several Trump-era regulations that they and advocacy groups have said hurt consumers and increased systemic risks.

The resolution, if passed, would overturn the rule using the Congressional Review Act, a 1996 law that empowers Congress to reverse recently finalized federal regulations. Passage would require only a simple majority vote in the two chambers. Democrats hold slim majorities in the House and Senate.

Killing the "true lender" rule, which was introduced by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC) last year, would deal a blow to financial technology firms that had wanted legal certainty as to whether state or federal rules applied when partnering with traditional lenders.

Democrats have argued that the rule allows financial technology firms to evade state usury laws and rate caps by partnering with banks that are subject to looser federal lending rules.

"We will not let this rule stand - nor will we sit idly by as predatory lenders attempt to take advantage of hard-working Americans," Van Hollen told Reuters in a statement.

Brown in a statement called the rule "a shameful attack on states' ability to protect their citizens from predatory loans."

"Predatory lending has no place in the federal banking system," OCC spokesman Bryan Hubbard said in a statement. "Rather than encouraging abusive lending, the OCC rule provides regulatory certainty regarding the responsibility and accountability of a bank's lending."

The OCC said when finalizing the rule in October that it aimed to clarify who is considered the "true lender" when institutions team up to issue a loan, which in turn would determine what requirements the loans must meet.

The OCC determined that if the bank is named as the lender in the loan agreement, then the relevant bank rules apply. In the case of nationally chartered banks, for example, federal banking rules - typically more relaxed when it comes to lending rates - would apply to the loan.

The OCC said that the ongoing legal uncertainty as to which rules apply to such partnerships had risked chilling innovative lending relationships, which could in turn restrict access to affordable credit.

On Monday, a coalition of liberal advocates called on lawmakers to rescind the rule, saying it enables lenders "to charge triple-digit interest rates, target the financially vulnerable and communities of color and trap consumers in devastating cycles of debt."

In January, seven U.S. states and Washington, D.C., sued the OCC seeking to void the rule.

The Congressional Review Act is considered a blunt but powerful legal tool because it bans agencies from penning a substantively similar rule in future.

Industry groups said if the effort to undo the regulation is successful, the overall effect may be a reduction of credit for consumers.


U.S. Democratic lawmakers seek to undo 'predatory' banking rule

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Post also to:
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (1)
Ad Cline
Ad Cline Mar 26, 2021 2:30AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
if there is a buck to be made the banks Will make the loan. the difference here is they will still make money just not as much.
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
Sign up with Email