Breaking News
LAST CHANCE for Cyber Monday SALE: Up to 54% off InvestingPro! Register here
Investing Pro 0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your experience. Save up to 40% More details

Why All Crypto Eyes Are on the U.S. Congress This Week

CryptocurrencySep 29, 2021 03:00AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
Why All Crypto Eyes Are on the U.S. Congress This Week

The U.S. Congress has a packed agenda this week. There are three key pieces of legislation that they are planning to tackle:

  • A $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill that includes some language regarding the definition of crypto “brokers” that could impact cryptocurrency markets;
  • An additional $3.5 trillion dollar spending bill that will expand spending on social welfare programs and climate change initiatives;
  • As well as a measure to raise the debt ceiling to allow the U.S. government to continue to borrow more money to pay past debts.
  • The first legislative project listed above has been getting a lot of attention within the cryptocurrency space because it contains the first bit of U.S. crypto regulation with bite. The bill contains a broad definition for crypto “brokers” – whom are likely to be primary targets for taxation to help fund the infrastructure bill.

    Under the current vague language, an argument could be made that “brokers” could include individual crypto miners and software developers, in addition to crypto exchanges.

    Conventional wisdom holds that if the current language is approved into law, it could have a chilling effect on the entire cryptocurrency industry. However, there are some important things to keep in mind even if this current legislative bill gets signed into law.

    As it stands now, the U.S. Treasury Department would be the primary agency that would interpret the law if passed. It’s been reported that the Treasury intends to “…provide clarifying guidance after the bill is passed to provide exemptions to firms that do not actually operate as brokers.” Those reports should help ease some of the FUD within the crypto-space surrounding this proposal.

    Several media outlets have also reported that Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen opposed amendments to the bill in an effort to intentionally keep the “broker” definition vague to give her agency greater flexibility to interpret the pending law.

    Additionally, the House of Representatives approved a critical defense spending bill last week that already contains a framework to more thoughtfully consider a regulatory outline for cryptocurrencies within the US.

    On Thursday, Coindesk reported that a key crypto provision was included in the must-pass, bipartisan defense spending bill called The National Defense Authorization Act. The proposed language would require clarity as to whether the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) should have final oversight regarding various sectors of the crypto marketplace.

    While the Senate still needs to pass its own version of the defense bill, it has wide support from both Republicans and Democrats. It’s expected to pass easily through both houses and then through the entire Congress.

    Once approved, the crypto language in the defense bill, which was inserted by Rep. Patrick McHenry (R-N.C.), could supersede the vague crypto language in the infrastructure bill because the defense provision would require establishing where the crypto sphere of control lies by law.

    Furthermore, the defense provision would mandate a more thorough review of the cryptocurrency regulatory needs by creating a working group within 90 days of the bill’s passage. The working group would be composed of SEC and CFTC representatives, as well as non-governmental individuals from small businesses and the financial tech sector.

    It’s worth noting that even though the $1.5 trillion infrastructure bill cannot have new amendments added at this point, it can have language removed. It’s not impossible to see the crypto language removed from the House version of the infrastructure bill at the last minute, on the grounds that last week’s defense bill already contains a path forward for crypto regulation.

    Finally, a Washington, D.C. policy expert – speaking on condition of anonymity with DailyCoin – says it’s not guaranteed that either the $1.5 trillion infrastructure plan or $3.5 trillion social programs bill will pass the Senate in their current versions.

    “The Speaker [Nancy Pelosi] announced last night that the House will vote on the bipartisan infrastructure package on Thursday. That may satisfy the 8-10 moderate Democrats who were demanding a vote on the infrastructure before reconciliation. This does not mean, however, that either package will pass the Senate.” Given all these legislative wrinkles that need to be ironed out, it should be an interesting week to say the least.

    On The Flipside

    • Even though Democrats control both houses of Congress, there is a lot of division within that party.
    • If they can’t secure every Democratic vote, one or both of these provisions could fail
    • That would be a major setback for the Biden administration and the Democratic agenda to advance any significant legislation before next year’s midterm election.

    Why You Should Care?

    This week could mark a flashpoint for the future of cryptocurrency regulation within the largest economy in the world.


    Join to get the flipside of crypto

    Upgrade your inbox and get our DailyCoin editors’ picks 1x a week delivered straight to your inbox.

    [contact-form-7] You can always unsubscribe with just 1 click.

    Continue reading on DailyCoin

    Why All Crypto Eyes Are on the U.S. Congress This Week

    Related Articles

    Add a Comment

    Comment Guidelines

    We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

    •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

    •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

    •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

    • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
    • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
    • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
    • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
    • Only English comments will be allowed.

    Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at’s discretion.

    Write your thoughts here
    Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
    Post also to:
    Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
    Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
    Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
    Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
    Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
    Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
    Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
    Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
    Add Chart to Comment
    Confirm Block

    Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

    By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's's posts.

    %USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

    Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

    Report this comment

    I feel that this comment is:

    Comment flagged

    Thank You!

    Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
    Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

    Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
    Continue with Google
    Sign up with Email