Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

When Will The SEC Vs. Ripple Lawsuit End?

CryptocurrencyApr 20, 2021 06:31AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
When Will The SEC Vs. Ripple Lawsuit End?

Cryptocurrencies were created to facilitate faster payments between users and establish a network that is not dependent on a centralized entity. Although decentralization is the foundational pillar of cryptocurrencies, blockchain technology has become utilized in financial markets to enable quicker and easier payments.

Despite its centralized nature, Ripple has previously divided the crypto community. However, with the ongoing US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit, XRP holders and blockchain devotees have created a front against harsh regulatory measures.

XRP, the native token of Ripple Labs, facilitates faster and more economical transfers between institutions. At the end of 2020, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Ripple Labs, accusing the company and its co-founders of failing to register their native XRP token as a security.

Bullish Momentum On XRP

The case between Ripple Labs and the SEC continues to make headlines four months after the regulator initiated the lawsuit at the end of 2020. Despite the ongoing legal action and MoneyGram, Ripple’s leading partner, halting their collaboration due to the lawsuit, the price of XRP generated incredible gains in the past month.

Ripple moved by nearly 300% in April, reaching a new all-time high. The cryptocurrency has catapulted into the top five coins by market cap once more as its price passed the $1 mark. Despite being banned from several exchanges, XRP investors saw upward price movement as positive news on the case began to reach media outlets.

The SEC Vs. Ripple Saga Continues

XRP holders filed a case against the SEC claiming damages for investment losses after the initial Ripple lawsuit. However, on March 19, a district judge denied a motion filed on behalf of around 6,000 XRP holders, which had argued that they are not sufficiently represented in the case.

The SEC’s lawsuit is based upon the Howey Test, which determines whether a transaction should be regarded as an investment contract and registered as a security. However, a recent research paper by a professor at Rutgers Law School has deflated the SEC’s reliance on the test. The professor argued that the Howey Test is no longer compatible with investment processes in the 21st century as digitization and other elements have shifted investment dynamics.

Similarly, former CFTC chairman Christopher Giancarlo claimed that XRP is not a security. He emphasized similarities between Bitcoin and Ethereum and did not make any remarks regarding XRP, a top-three token for several years. He further argued that a security is an investment that should lead to profits from the efforts of “promoting” the asset by the owner. In the case of XRP, the price is related to its usage.

Furthermore, Ripple’s position in the lawsuit is becoming more favorable as the SEC’s ability to prove their case diminishes. The judge has denied the SEC access to the personal information of Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen (the CEO and co-founder of Ripple Labs, respectively). What’s more, the SEC claimed access to the information despite the co-founder’s agreement to provide relevant data regarding their activity.

The multi-million dollar case has reached a tipping point in the eyes of many XRP holders. Judge Torres claimed, “My understanding about XRP is that not only does it have a currency value, but it has a utility, and that utility distinguishes it from Bitcoin and Ether.” That highlights the fact that the XRP token has a valid use case, and although the founders have issued tokens, they were produced to be used within the network.

On the Flipside

  • The lawsuit was filed in December 2020, and there are suspicions that the case is a personal attack rather than legally motivated.
  • The new chairman of the SEC, Gary Gensler, has a more positive perspective on cryptocurrencies as he has mentioned Bitcoin positively in the past.
  • The outcome of the lawsuit will create a paradigm shift in terms of how the US defines cryptocurrency securities. If Ripple loses the case, XRP will no longer be available in the US.

Is The End Of The Lawsuit Nearing?

On April 6, the US magistrate judge Sarah Netburn permitted access to the internal conversation of the SEC regarding cryptocurrencies. While there are no further indications about the amount of data and the period in which Ripple Labs can access information, the decision is undoubtedly a step forward.

Moreover, the SEC has sought to gain insights from non-US regulators regarding Ripple usage. Ripple has argued that such an initiative is “outside the scope of the Federal Rules and the Hague Convention.” Additionally, the SEC failed to provide communications with foreign regulators, and Ripple’s lawyers are requesting to seize any attempt by the SEC to access Ripple Labs’ memorandums of understanding with non-US entities.

The SEC’s actions are, according to the defendants, misleading the court as they claim “every sale is a violation.” With an abundance of recent positive conclusions in favor of Ripple Labs, any new information it discovers regarding the SEC’s communications about cryptocurrencies could halt the lawsuit.

The court has already decided in Ripple’s favor on two key questions in the pre-trial discovery phase. Now, Ripple’s Brad Garlinghouse and Chris Larsen have asked the judge to dismiss the SEC’s case altogether, claiming further damages.

Continue reading on DailyCoin

When Will The SEC Vs. Ripple Lawsuit End?
 

Related Articles

Solana: The Road to Decentralization
Solana: The Road to Decentralization By DailyCoin - Sep 20, 2021 1

The Solana network started experiencing “intermittent performance degradation” in August. Concerns about centralization are hovering around the cryptocurrency...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
Comments (8)
Shane Nixon
Shane Nixon Apr 21, 2021 9:37AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
I stopped reading after the 5th paragraph as this is very inaccurate. Ripple is the software company, XRP is the token they use within their software. "Ripple moved by nearly 300% in April, reaching a new all-time high". Wrong. XRP moved nearly 300% and it wasn't even close to an all time high which was $3.84 in Dec. 2018. Also, XRP ledger is one of the MOST decentralized in the space...Ripple controls less than 14% of the nodes. Please do better homework. Cheers
Rick Baier
Rick Baier Apr 20, 2021 10:51PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
SEC is a ***organization. They hurt alot if people who owned XRP especially on Coinbase. Sickening
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter Apr 20, 2021 4:52PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
"If Ripple loses the case, XRP will no longer be available in the US." Wrong! If Ripple loses the case, which they will not, XRP WOULD most certainly still be available in the United States. But only under the legal fiction of it being something it isn't, a "security". There are TONS of securities available in the United States. And as an investment site, you should be the FIRST to know this! Please fix this falsehood in your article before it has a miniscule negative impact on the XRP price.
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter Apr 20, 2021 4:48PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Test comment. Btw, I didn't read your EULA, and I don't agree with it.
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter
DuckDuckGo Ismuchbetter Apr 20, 2021 4:46PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
Test comment
John Shiels
John Shiels Apr 20, 2021 10:12AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
When the delisters come crawling back, it will be too late.
Accsia Finance
Accsia Finance Apr 20, 2021 8:19AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
You article is pure of misinformation. XRP is open source, independent and decentralized. You embarrassing yourselves.
Vv Pp
Vv Pp Apr 20, 2021 7:43AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This comment has already been saved in your Saved Items
super important case about the future of cryptos as a whole. Humble opinion, nothing can stop the change to a new, more free, and decentralized era, it's just a matter of time
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email