Breaking News
Investing Pro 0
Extended Sale! Save on premium data with Claim 60% OFF

Vitalik Buterin downplays clamor for Ethereum PoW forks

Published Aug 08, 2022 07:05PM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Vitalik Buterin downplays clamor for Ethereum PoW forks
 
ETC/USD
-0.55%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 
ETH/USD
+1.72%
Add to/Remove from Watchlist
Add to Watchlist
Add Position

Position added successfully to:

Please name your holdings portfolio
 

Amid agitation from some quarters to retain Ethereum’s current PoW algorithm, the network’s co-founder Vitalik Buterin has downplayed the potential effect of any hard forks on the cryptocurrency.

Speaking at ETHSeoul over the weekend, Buterin said, “I don’t expect Ethereum to really be significantly harmed by another fork,” CoinDesk reported on Monday.

With Ethereum’s highly-anticipated Merge event slated for September, some proponents of the Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus have suggested performing a hard fork on the network to retain the status quo. The Merge upgrade will mark the network’s transition to a Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus, a change that the developers believe will enable faster and cheaper transactions.

The transition to PoS will bring an end to the source of revenue for Ethereum miners. Miners are rewarded for validating transactions on the blockchain, and data pegs the miner revenue for the month of July at more than $620 million worth of Ether. As a result, a handful of miners, including prominent Chinese miners such as Chandler Guo, have proposed forking the Ethereum mainnet.

Notably, Tron’s founder Justin Sun has pledged a portion of his one million Ether portfolio to the development of a so-called EthereumPoW network.

On his part, Buterin believes that instead of creating more hard forks of Ethereum’s current PoW network, proponents of the PoW consensus should shift their focus to Ethereum Classic. He said:

I think Ethereum Classic already has a superior community and a superior product for people kind of with those pro-proof-of-work values and preferences. Pretty much everyone in the Ethereum ecosystem is supportive of the move to proof-of-stake validation and is quite united.

Continue reading on BTC Peers

Vitalik Buterin downplays clamor for Ethereum PoW forks
 

Related Articles

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.
  • Any comment you publish, together with your investing.com profile, will be public on investing.com and may be indexed and available through third party search engines, such as Google.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email