Breaking News
0
Ad-Free Version. Upgrade your Investing.com experience. Save up to 40% More details

Tackling the Energy Consumption of Proof-of-Work

CryptocurrencyJul 16, 2021 11:01AM ET
Saved. See Saved Items.
This article has already been saved in your Saved Items
 
Tackling the Energy Consumption of Proof-of-Work

  • The debate over the energy efficiency of the PoW model has been discussed more and more.
  • PoS is currently the most popular energy-efficient option.
  • New Proof-of-Trust (PoT) approach is offering greener alternatives without compromising on the speed, scalability, and security that users have become accustomed to.

How energy efficient is Bitcoin actually? The question has sparked quite a discussion in the past months, various experts disagreeing on the topic.

The Proof-of-Work (PoW) consensus mechanism used by blockchains like Bitcoin is known for its energy-intensive mining requirements. Estimates from the University of Cambridge showed Bitcoin’s annual energy consumption reaching as high as 140TWh, or a continuous draw of over 15 gigawatts of electricity, in May this year. This is equivalent to the consumption of a country the size of Argentina and is often generated from fossil fuels.

Since China’s crackdown on the Bitcoin mining industry due to concerns over energy use and other financial risks, this annual rate has fallen to a low of 65TWh after an estimated 90% of Chinese mining capacity at least temporarily shut down in search of relocation.

The debate over the energy efficiency of Bitcoin’s PoW model was also fueled by Tesla’s influential CEO Elon Musk who expressed concern over the “increasing use of fossil fuels for Bitcoin mining and transactions.” This led to Tesla’s suspension of bitcoin support for car purchases until “mining transitions to more sustainable energy.” Musk further suggested:

“We are also looking at other cryptocurrencies that use less than 1% of Bitcoin’s energy per transaction.” Such criticism of the energy consumption levels of PoW blockchains has gained traction, impacting the performance of the wider asset class and leading to louder calls for greener alternatives, with Proof-of-Stake (PoS) consensus models widely considered the most viable.

Transitioning to Proof-of-Stake Models

With the energy efficiency of cryptocurrencies at the forefront of industry debate, PoS models are the most commonly suggested alternative having already surpassed the adoption rate of PoW based blockchains and with Ethereum also looking to transition to a Proof-of-Stake model with the deployment of Ethereum 2.0.

Rather than expending computational energy to win the right to add new blocks of transactions to a blockchain and help secure PoW networks like Bitcoin, PoS uses economic incentives based on the staking of tokens on a network. Instead of using intensive energy consumption to solve the complex mathematical problems required to earn PoW block rewards, participants in PoS models lock up tokens in return for a share of the rewards and face staked tokens being seized in the event of misbehavior through a process known as slashing.

This commonly takes the form of staking tokens to run validator nodes as an alternative to PoW mining nodes or by staking tokens and delegating to a validator if participants don’t want to run one themselves. Validators and their stakers are then selected to produce blocks and earn rewards based on the proportional amount of tokens staked, staking duration, and pseudo-random selection.

The result is a secure alternative to PoW that uses over 99% less energy, according to the Ethereum Foundation. The costs to power PoS nodes are also expected to further reduce over time as technology improves, as opposed to the generally increasing energy consumption costs of PoW networks as they grow.

It’s no wonder proponents see PoS as a more energy-efficient alternative, though there are arguments that PoW networks like Bitcoin do incentivize the adoption of renewable energy sources to reduce costs. Bitcoin is also effective in reducing waste energy at the source, such as utilizing flare gas at oil drilling sites that would otherwise be burned off.

It’s not just about operational energy consumption, however, and the high-specification, high-cost specialized hardware used in PoS requires resources in production that are not necessarily renewable, leading to the exploration of greener models.

Proof-of-Trust’s Greener Alternative

While PoS is currently the most popular energy-efficient option, it’s not the only solution, with consensus mechanisms like Proof-of-Trust (PoT) offering greener alternatives without compromising on the speed, scalability, and security that users have become accustomed to.

That’s the view of Dr. Nir Haloani, CTO of enterprise-grade fintech platform COTI. COTI uses a Proof-of-Trust (PoT) consensus algorithm with a block-less and miner-less structure, combining direct acyclic graphs (DAGs) and “Trust Scores.”

Nodes on the PoT network are assigned Trust Scores to quickly identify reputable peers with which to broadcast transactions, confirming them in near real-time at low cost without wasting the additional time and, therefore, energy consumption of other consensus models.

For other blockchain-based protocols, achieving scalability without increasing energy consumption is a challenge. With PoT, each transaction is represented by the user’s Trust Score, and to be added to the ledger, it must be attached to two previous transactions with a similar Trust Score threshold. This alternative clustering structure connects transactions simultaneously rather than linearly to solve scalability in an energy-efficient manner.

On The Flipside

  • Only time and real life applications could show how these three models actually work and affect the environment.

EMAIL NEWSLETTER

Join to get the flipside of crypto

Upgrade your inbox and get our DailyCoin editors’ picks 1x a week delivered straight to your inbox.

[contact-form-7] You can always unsubscribe with just 1 click.

Continue reading on DailyCoin

Tackling the Energy Consumption of Proof-of-Work
 

Related Articles

Cardano Summit 2021. What to Expect
Cardano Summit 2021. What to Expect By DailyCoin - Sep 24, 2021 1

Cardano will be hosting a hybrid-virtual summit across all continents between September 25-26. Hydra, Cardano’s layer two scaling solutions, will be presented during...

Add a Comment

Comment Guidelines

We encourage you to use comments to engage with other users, share your perspective and ask questions of authors and each other. However, in order to maintain the high level of discourse we’ve all come to value and expect, please keep the following criteria in mind:  

  •            Enrich the conversation, don’t trash it.

  •           Stay focused and on track. Only post material that’s relevant to the topic being discussed. 

  •           Be respectful. Even negative opinions can be framed positively and diplomatically. Avoid profanity, slander or personal attacks directed at an author or another user. Racism, sexism and other forms of discrimination will not be tolerated.

  • Use standard writing style. Include punctuation and upper and lower cases. Comments that are written in all caps and contain excessive use of symbols will be removed.
  • NOTE: Spam and/or promotional messages and comments containing links will be removed. Phone numbers, email addresses, links to personal or business websites, Skype/Telegram/WhatsApp etc. addresses (including links to groups) will also be removed; self-promotional material or business-related solicitations or PR (ie, contact me for signals/advice etc.), and/or any other comment that contains personal contact specifcs or advertising will be removed as well. In addition, any of the above-mentioned violations may result in suspension of your account.
  • Doxxing. We do not allow any sharing of private or personal contact or other information about any individual or organization. This will result in immediate suspension of the commentor and his or her account.
  • Don’t monopolize the conversation. We appreciate passion and conviction, but we also strongly believe in giving everyone a chance to air their point of view. Therefore, in addition to civil interaction, we expect commenters to offer their opinions succinctly and thoughtfully, but not so repeatedly that others are annoyed or offended. If we receive complaints about individuals who take over a thread or forum, we reserve the right to ban them from the site, without recourse.
  • Only English comments will be allowed.

Perpetrators of spam or abuse will be deleted from the site and prohibited from future registration at Investing.com’s discretion.

Write your thoughts here
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
Post also to:
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Thanks for your comment. Please note that all comments are pending until approved by our moderators. It may therefore take some time before it appears on our website.
 
Are you sure you want to delete this chart?
 
Post
 
Replace the attached chart with a new chart ?
1000
Your ability to comment is currently suspended due to negative user reports. Your status will be reviewed by our moderators.
Please wait a minute before you try to comment again.
Add Chart to Comment
Confirm Block

Are you sure you want to block %USER_NAME%?

By doing so, you and %USER_NAME% will not be able to see any of each other's Investing.com's posts.

%USER_NAME% was successfully added to your Block List

Since you’ve just unblocked this person, you must wait 48 hours before renewing the block.

Report this comment

I feel that this comment is:

Comment flagged

Thank You!

Your report has been sent to our moderators for review
Disclaimer: Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. All CFDs (stocks, indexes, futures) and Forex prices are not provided by exchanges but rather by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual market price, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Therefore Fusion Media doesn`t bear any responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using this data.

Fusion Media or anyone involved with Fusion Media will not accept any liability for loss or damage as a result of reliance on the information including data, quotes, charts and buy/sell signals contained within this website. Please be fully informed regarding the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, it is one of the riskiest investment forms possible.
Continue with Google
or
Sign up with Email